Wes Janson
Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2006
- Messages
- 1,962
It seems to me that the issue at heart isn't that the little girl was killed by irresponsible shooting so much as that they broke Rule 4. This might be unpopular, but personally I'd say the irresponsible thing is shooting a weapon outdoors with houses and people well within the maximum range of the projectile, downrange. It didn't need be a Hellfire or bump firing that could have caused that death, it might just as easily been under different circumstances a ricochet, or an AD/ND.
We obviously don't have any way of knowing what sort of range these people were on, whether it had an adequate safe zone behind the berm or not. So then why be so quick to claim their behavior was dangerous? For all we know, the next ten miles downrange consisted of nothing but forest. Focus on the true problems, and don't assume that people are acting recklessly without proof.
We obviously don't have any way of knowing what sort of range these people were on, whether it had an adequate safe zone behind the berm or not. So then why be so quick to claim their behavior was dangerous? For all we know, the next ten miles downrange consisted of nothing but forest. Focus on the true problems, and don't assume that people are acting recklessly without proof.