Saw this on History channel a while back, while it might be totally hypothetical I think that it as a really good grain of truth in it. There are tons of SHTF threads on this board, and I feel that most of them devolve into these abstract threads about what/which gun etc.. In light of this info presented in the history channel doc I feel that choice of armament etc, is somewhat secondary. It seems to me that while being armed is very important it would be more important having enough water and a good amount of anti-depressants would be more beneficial. I doubt that most of us would be able to handle the immense psychological pressures of such a horrible disaster
Ok, here's the link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r97xoSOEjM
Also, a great "Documentary" to watch about a similar topic is Peter Watkins's The War Game. It was made in the mid 60's and is based on leaked British Govt. documents outlining what the scenario would be if there was a nuclear attack. According to the film, a large part of the population would be rendered useless, unable to deal with the mental pressures.
Thanks for lending and ear, and I look forward to hearing what you guys have to say!
Ok, here's the link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r97xoSOEjM
Also, a great "Documentary" to watch about a similar topic is Peter Watkins's The War Game. It was made in the mid 60's and is based on leaked British Govt. documents outlining what the scenario would be if there was a nuclear attack. According to the film, a large part of the population would be rendered useless, unable to deal with the mental pressures.
Thanks for lending and ear, and I look forward to hearing what you guys have to say!