General Geoff
Member
The issue at hand is academic in practice (yeah I know, oxymoron, sort of).
If for some reason there was a state of emergency declared, no law (even the proposed one) would stop a determined governor from giving the order to confiscate arms from the citizens. They would claim the law is null due to the "state of emergency."
Granted the law would come into play afterwards (as a viable court defense), should any intrepid citizens decide to defend their property against crooked law enforcement. And before you say "they were just doing their jobs," Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
If for some reason there was a state of emergency declared, no law (even the proposed one) would stop a determined governor from giving the order to confiscate arms from the citizens. They would claim the law is null due to the "state of emergency."
Granted the law would come into play afterwards (as a viable court defense), should any intrepid citizens decide to defend their property against crooked law enforcement. And before you say "they were just doing their jobs," Ignorance of the law is no excuse.