ConstitutionCowboy
member
Question. A serious question: Would a firearm be considered a machine gun under the law if it's magazine only held one round of ammo and could only fire that one round even though the rest of the gun could fire continuously if there were a magazine constructed that held more than one round? The firearm would only fire one round of ammo for each pull of the trigger with its original magazine.
Another question: Suppose that you had a semi-auto that would fire continuously with a specially designed magazine, but would only fire one round per each pull of the trigger with its original magazine. Would that firearm be considered a machine gun or just the specially designed magazine?
Woody
Another question: Suppose that you had a semi-auto that would fire continuously with a specially designed magazine, but would only fire one round per each pull of the trigger with its original magazine. Would that firearm be considered a machine gun or just the specially designed magazine?
Caveat: The specially designed magazine would not in any way alter the inner workings of the semi-auto to turn it into a machine gun.
Woody