Too much power in the hands of police? You decide.

Status
Not open for further replies.

kbr80

member
Joined
May 3, 2003
Messages
553
Location
AR
Texas Drug Sting Lawsuit Settled for $5 Million

Thursday, March 11, 2004



AMARILLO, Texas — More than 40 people snared in a now-discredited drug sting in the Texas Panhandle town of Tulia will share $5 million as part of a settlement, an attorney for the plaintiffs said.

The agreement with the nearby city of Amarillo, announced Wednesday, also ends the multiagency task force that ran the sting operation. It was cheered by the NAACP (search) and attorneys representing those arrested in what many believe was a racially motivated operation.

"The settlement that was reached is truly historic," attorney Jeff Blackburn told The Associated Press. "It represents the first example of a responsible city government putting an end to irresponsible task force system of narcotics enforcement."

Marcus Norris, Amarillo's city attorney, called the settlement the responsible thing to do, adding that the city recognizes the "misjustice" done in Tulia by the task force.

"The law on who is responsible for the task force is very unsettled and the city could not risk a $30-, $50- or $100- million dollar judgment," Norris said.

All but one of the 46 people arrested — most of them black — will receive some portion of the $5 million. The person not included is deceased. A claims administrator will divide the funds.

The task force's only undercover agent, Tom Coleman, who is white, said he bought drugs from the defendants, but he worked alone and used no audio or video surveillance. No drugs or money were found during the arrests.

The case cast an often-unflattering light on the farming town of about 5,000 between Lubbock and Amarillo on the High Plains. Amarillo, as a participant in the task force, saw an "injustice" and wanted to right it, Blackburn said.

Kizzy White, who will receive part of the settlement, said Thursday she is satisfied with it and is especially glad to see the task force disbanded.

"They need to be gone, and let the city and county do the job," said White, who spent four years behind bars and was released in 2003. "The money is good, too, but that can't bring back the time I missed with my kids."

Mediation is ongoing with others named in the lawsuit — 26 counties and three cities that were involved with the Panhandle Regional Narcotics Trafficking Task Force (search).

Swisher County officials earlier approved a $250,000 settlement for those imprisoned based on Coleman's testimony in exchange for the defendants promising not to sue the county. Coleman no longer is an officer.

Vanita Gupta, an attorney with the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund (search) who also represents the plaintiffs, commended the city of Amarillo for doing the right thing.

"It's not simply that Tom Coleman was a rogue officer," she said. "The city of Amarillo has recognized that federally funded task forces are ineffective tools of law enforcement and they operate as rogue task forces because they are unaccountable to any oversight mechanism."

Coleman, who testified at trials that he bought cocaine from the defendants, is scheduled to stand trial May 24 on perjury charges related to testimony he gave during evidentiary hearings.

Former state Judge Ron Chapman, who was brought out of retirement to preside over a review of the cases, said in a report that Coleman was "the most devious, nonresponsive witness this court has witnessed in 25 years on the bench in Texas."

A task force leader had testified that Coleman's former employers said he needed constant supervision, was a discipline problem and tended to run to his mother for help.

After their arrests, some of the first defendants who went to trial received lengthy sentences, one as much as 90 years. That prompted other defendants to take plea agreements for lesser terms out of fear of lengthy sentences.

Gov. Rick Perry granted pardons to 35 of those convicted.
 
The Tula travesty happened under the watch of Gov. Bush.


So?

I doubt W. was giving orders telling the police to trump up charges against blacks and other minorities.
 
idd...

"The Tula travesty happened under the watch of Gov. Bush."

It also happened while Bill Clinton was President, John Paul II was Pope, Saddam Hussein was President of Iraq, Howard Stern was on the radio, and you and I were living.

Have I left anyone out?
 
Yes, the police are too powerful. They have become militarized. Just a few weeks ago, my friend who is training to become an officer, informed me of how all the police cars swapped out their shotguns for full auto M4s. This is just one example of how they have been receiving military equipment and training.

As explained by one cop, todays cops have an "us versus them" mentality, where as the old peace officers considered themselves public servents and helpers to the citizens they've been sworn to protect.

When you start teaching cops to refere to the public as "civilians", along with the use of other military terminology, it really helps strengthen the conception that there is a division between the police and the public.
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, it depends on the cop.

We've got a lot of police on here and elsewhere that I think could be trusted with huge amounts of authority above and beyond what is allowed in our Constitution. I think they would employ it correctly and refrain from using it for the wrong reasons.

The problem is, we can't limit our police based on the best of the best - we have to consider the harm we're doing by granting more and more authority to the few bad police, or the many average cops who might be tempted to abuse their power.
 
Of course they have too much power, especially with how many bad cops are out there. Many police officers aren't even fully aware of the laws that they're supposed to enforce. How often do you hear of or experience a cop doing more than they're allowed to already?

In Michigan we recently had a cop fired (after 17 years) because he was found to be a pedophile after he was caught by a LEO pretending to be a 14 year old boy. I doubt that he just started doing this, so how long has this been goin on? We have too many criminals with a badge already, part of this is because they think they're above the law.

I was interested in becoming a LEO after I left the military, but the behavior of many officers caused me to choose otherwise. Many people go into LE to gain the feeling of having more power and this is obvious by how they react when they receive it.

Power breeds corruption.
 
(CannibalCrowley) part of this is because they think they're above the law.
They are. They are allowed weapons forbidden to others. They can speed any time they wish. They can, and do, lie to suspects. Once made special in one way, they predictably act above the law in any way they choose. Who's going to arrest them? A "whistleblower"? That's just a different name for "dead meat".

MR
 
Allright already. There are a few bad apples. You get what the people want; more laws, more officers, more "security." Elect different leaders not bent on controlling us and we can return to the era of the "Peace Officer"

There is no need to denigrate those that tenuously hold onto the thin blue line since there are a whole bunch of good ones. ;)
 
There is no need to denigrate those that tenuously hold onto the thin blue line since there are a whole bunch of good ones


Then you few good ones that hold the thin blue line should police yourselves. GO after the bad ones with a vengeance, if not, you are no better than they are.
 
To those that think 'twasnt so in the good old days

The thin blue line and us vs them IS NOT new my father was a Police officer back in the early 70's it was quite common then too.

As for the M-4 carbines repacing shotguns, it little difference execpt what the abailyt to overshoot the target has and the need for weapon training both get a lot bigger.

Personally it probably M-4 / 12ga won't make much diff due to the fact that by the time the officer could go get it, policy will say to call for SWAT in in situation that calles for a long gun. Just another lodge pin for the patroll officer.

If those M-4's are really class 3 it had better have great lock to keep it in the car when the officer is not.
 
Nestor....I couldn't understand a word of what you just posted! Please try to phrase your sentences into proper English so I can have a better time understanding them.

Remember, these M4 carbines are in the front seat of EVERY police car in this town. All you have to do to release them is to press a button on the dashboard. What do they need this kind of firepower for???

The officer told my friend that if there was any trouble, to press the button, take out the M4, and put it on full auto and start blasting....

Keep in mind that this officer never even showed this person how to use this weapon, let along fire it.
 
They have become militarized. Just a few weeks ago, my friend who is training to become an officer, informed me of how all the police cars swapped out their shotguns for full auto M4s.
I don't think M4s are really part of the problem. I think trained LEO with rifles available is a good idea, given the possibility of armored bad guys. The problem stems from the discrepancy between what LEO and other civilians such as us have access to. That double standard is what contributes to the concept of police being a different class than the public, IMHO.
 
Ok, why do they need full auto M4s as opposed to semi auto bushy's? Heck, a 30-30, or a bolt action .308 will punch through armor every bit as good as a .223.
 
(nightfall) I think trained LEO with rifles available is a good idea, given the possibility of armored bad guys.
Do you mean that murderers, arsonists, rapists, robbers and burglars wear bulletproof vests now?

MR
 
Ok, why do they need full auto M4s as opposed to semi auto bushy's? Heck, a 30-30, or a bolt action .308 will punch through armor every bit as good as a .223.
Do you want to be the guy with a .308 bolt action taking on several armored criminals in close proximity? I think we can agree an assault weapon is better suited for short range defensive work than a bolt action rifle. Now, as for semi auto, you may have a point. It partly depends on the training they get on the weapon. I'll leave discussion of full auto applications to those here who know better than I.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top