OK - let me clarify this whole confusion over spotters, and who really was the most impressive in the long shot competition. LOTS of misinformation out there, lots of ways to look at the pro/con aspect of every possibility. But for those who really like the show, this very honest behind the scenes stuff is important.
The person spotting was a guy named Trent that the network placed behind us, standing with a tall tripod (and what looked like maybe a compact Leupold spotting scope). There was a LOT of controversy with this, because the top long range guys were not sure how much they could trust this unknown spotter guy. A lot is riding on this, and do you want to rely on a stranger spotting for what could be the most important shot you ever take? Some guys wanted Pete or Kelly to spot for all of us, but the network could not do that without risking some element of fairness. And during all this frank talk about the spotter's credentials, he overheard and got directly involved... and it was all very uncomfortable. ME? I don't have any kind of long range credentials to say anything to anyone, so I just shut my mouth and listened (rare for me!)
There were times we (the shooters) didn't see our hits and we would then yell out for a spot, and if the spotter saw a hit he would then give his 'mil' call. There are times neither saw a hit. Its a friggin' MILE !!
I know for ME, I asked for a call on each shot and the spotter Trent gave me back what he thought he saw. I adjusted to the calls, and made the hit. And I still could not have been happier to hit in just 3 shots!!! I probably jumped up and down afterwards like a retarded chimp (not shown) and then ran over to thank the spotter with serious genuine gratitude. For all the ugly doubt and hurt feelings, I had to thank him big time for excellent spots. And he congratulated me for making great corrections. And the producers got a kick out of the whole thing because it was the happiest they ever saw me. Ha!!!!
As for the shooting order, we draw random shooting order and sometimes it might be better to go first, but most times not. You should listen to a podcast called "Top Shot Talk" (with Jim and Craig?). Jamie was on after this episode and gave some great insight. First, in this case it was probably best to go first because the temp/wind are closest to when the rifle was initially zero'ed. But still, conditions have changed over several hours before first shot, and Jamie still had to mentally figure his hold over (maybe 6ft off?) to make the shot.
Jamie on the podcast explained that the target did not really explode on the first shot. So he kept shooting, and it eventually blew up on 5th shot. And when the crew went down to change the exploding target, they actually found THREE bullet holes in the bullseye. Jamie hit 3 out of 5 !!! Sometimes the targets don't explode reliably and the production team has to rewind film with digital time code to determine actual record time for score. Lawyers go over every detail. It happened to at least one other person on the MILE shot, too. Truth be told, Jamie was glad he didn't see it blow on the first shot because it kept him from acting like an ass with celebratory foolishness. Ha!!!!!!!
As for the pro/com in shooting order, I think the winds and temps were better in the morning. Luck of the draw. We also had a lunch break in the middle of the event. And I would bet that afternoon shooters were sniffing around for hold-over tips from the morning crew. Or trying to find George at the rest room line? Never know.
The point is really that every shooting order is by random drawing. And you can find a pro/con argument to make for either morning or afternoon shooting position. And Jamie made the best shot(s) that day on the mile long rifle challenge, by any measure, against all competition assembled there that day, and no matter who you might be rooting for to win.