Direct accross trade; A NIB(100%)Ruger RST4(1 of 5000).22 pistol for a(98%)Smith & Wesson model 14-3(K-38)with a 6-inch barrel:
Based upon just common Gun Bluebook values, the Ruger RST4(100%)is valued at $395 and, the S&W 14-3(98%)is valued at only $250.
Despite these Gun Bluebook values, what are your opinions about whether or not, it would be good to trade my RST4(With box!) for an S&W 14-3(No box!)? I ask this in view of a Ruger being a Ruger and a Smith being a Smith, in the real world? I know that it is hard to predict future values on these two guns-but, I'm just wondering if just the S&W name alone, would make the 14-3, the better investment, than would be for the Ruger RST4? Please give me your honest opinions(With reasons?)? Or, would the S&W 14-3 not be considered to be that popular of an S&W revolver(Or, if too many of these were made?)to make the 14-3, not all too desireable, as the better, "Collectible"?
Based upon just common Gun Bluebook values, the Ruger RST4(100%)is valued at $395 and, the S&W 14-3(98%)is valued at only $250.
Despite these Gun Bluebook values, what are your opinions about whether or not, it would be good to trade my RST4(With box!) for an S&W 14-3(No box!)? I ask this in view of a Ruger being a Ruger and a Smith being a Smith, in the real world? I know that it is hard to predict future values on these two guns-but, I'm just wondering if just the S&W name alone, would make the 14-3, the better investment, than would be for the Ruger RST4? Please give me your honest opinions(With reasons?)? Or, would the S&W 14-3 not be considered to be that popular of an S&W revolver(Or, if too many of these were made?)to make the 14-3, not all too desireable, as the better, "Collectible"?