In my first combat match (IPSC variant) ever last week, I had a graphic demonstration of how helpful night-sights are. On my XD, I've got the factory sights, and until last week, felt comfortable with planning to use them with the Surefire I carry with me all the time. However, on the range, the RSO forbade the use of flashlights, and we had to shoot that string using only the light from a slow strobe. By the time you got your pistol on target, the light was gone, so you had to shoot from memory and feel--memory of where the target was, and feel of where your weapon was pointing.
We had one shooter with Trijicons on his Kimber, and he cleared the course with a faster time and higher hit ratio than anyone else, which led me to think that I've got to get night sights on my XD. Granted, night-sights do NOT illuminate the target and allow you to make a positive identification, but they sure come in handy once you've determined that what's out there needs to be shot.
My question is this: What's the difference between Novak style Trijicons and regular style, besides $17? The Novaks that I saw were longer, and sloped on the edges and front, and appeared to have a longer sight channel. Having the back edges beveled would be nice for carry I suppose, but the sloping front concerns me as it doesn't seem to be necessary since the front of your sight wouldn't be interfering with your draw anyways, and would interfere with how I charge my weapon one-handed (hooking the rear sight over the belt and pushing down on the frame).
So what makes Novaks worth $17 more?
-Teuf
We had one shooter with Trijicons on his Kimber, and he cleared the course with a faster time and higher hit ratio than anyone else, which led me to think that I've got to get night sights on my XD. Granted, night-sights do NOT illuminate the target and allow you to make a positive identification, but they sure come in handy once you've determined that what's out there needs to be shot.
My question is this: What's the difference between Novak style Trijicons and regular style, besides $17? The Novaks that I saw were longer, and sloped on the edges and front, and appeared to have a longer sight channel. Having the back edges beveled would be nice for carry I suppose, but the sloping front concerns me as it doesn't seem to be necessary since the front of your sight wouldn't be interfering with your draw anyways, and would interfere with how I charge my weapon one-handed (hooking the rear sight over the belt and pushing down on the frame).
So what makes Novaks worth $17 more?
-Teuf