TSA Loses Fake Bomb at Newark Airport

Status
Not open for further replies.

WT

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2003
Messages
1,985
I guess the TSA Nazis didn't want to be outdone by the French.



Bomb detection test goes wrong at Newark Airport
Wednesday, December 15, 2004
BY RON MARSICO
Star-Ledger Staff

Federal security screeners lost a bag containing a test explosive last night at Newark Liberty International Airport, creating a major security breach in Terminal C, a high- ranking U.S. Transportation Security Administration official confirmed early today.

The test explosive was a fake because it contained "an inert material" and was not dangerous, the official said.

Individuals familiar with the incident said the luggage, tagged for a Continental flight to Amsterdam, could not be found and was presumed to be on the outbound flight, which was scheduled to depart the airport sometime after 6 p.m.

The test explosive was placed in the bag by a supervisor and sent through an SUV-size bomb-detection machine, according to individuals familiar with the incident. But TSA baggage screeners lost sight of the bag after the machine sounded an alarm, and the bag slipped through to the secure side of the airport, the individuals said.

After searching the terminal for several hours, the bag was not found, the individuals said.

Reached late last night, Marcus Arroyo, the federal security director at Newark Airport, said only that he was "in the middle of something."
Despite the breach, no flights were delayed and the terminal was not shut down.

The security lapse is the latest problem for the TSA at Newark Airport, one of three airports used by terrorists on Sept. 11, 2001. The TSA has suffered from staffing shortages and a range of security troubles throughout the year.

In October, it was revealed that screeners at Newark Airport missed one in four fake explosives and weapons in covert weekly tests conducted throughout the summer by TSA agents, according to confidential reports obtained by The Star-Ledger. Earlier this month, the newspaper reported that TSA screeners at Newark Airport on average missed six work weeks -- in addition to their vacation and holiday time -- in the first 9 1/2 months of this year due to sick time, injuries and leave without pay.

Last night's incident is similar to one that embarrassed aviation security officials in France last week when authorities there lost a bag containing explosives used to test bomb-sniffing dogs. Those explosives, however, were real. Officials in France said the incident prompted them to issue an edict prohibiting the use of live explosives in future tests.

The TSA official, speaking only on condition of anonymity, said the test included "simulated Semtex," which is a common plastic explosive, as well as a detonator, wiring and a clock. The items are typically part of a test explosive kit.

Top TSA officials returned to Terminal C last night to help in the search and spent hours at the terminal, but were unsuccessful, according to one of the individuals.

Officials with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the airport's operator, did not return calls late last night.
 
Somebody please tell me why the TSA is placing items in paying customers baggage to test their systems. Have none of these geniuses ever thought to use their own pool of luggage to test with? Here's an idea: The TSA approaches a traveler at random and offers to purchase the travelers used luggage and replace it with a new case right there in the airport. 30some bags of various types and condition should be sufficient a sized pool for the TSA to draw on for use in their systems tests. Time for a test? Supv. grabs a bag at random, stuffs some old clothes in it, along with the test material and sends into the queue.
 
Sindawe:
This is the government we're talking about, please remove all commonsense from the discussion. :banghead:

They would never allow for such a procurement procedure, it would be too difficult for the screeners.

The new test method is as follows:
All tests will be carried out using the Govt-issued test baggage, military-green in color, visibly marked "US Govt Property" in 2" high stenciled letters on all sides and filled with identical clothing and personal effects. The load list for the contents of the bag must go as far as to specify the size of the tighty-whities and the brand of deoderant to be included. The device will also be placed in an identical location within each test bag. Deviations from the specification will not be tolerated.

Kharn
 
where does the article say it was a customer's bag? unless you know something not in the article. It just says it was placed in a bag and that bag was checked for a continental flight to amsterdam. This doesn't mean the bag belonged to a customer.
 
raz-O,

All bags that are checked onto a flight are positively matched to a customer on that flight. So, for the TSA to be able to put a checked bag tag on the bag there must be a reservation record that matches the number on the bag.

The TSA could have some help/cooperation with the airlines in that the airline makes-up a fake reservation so that a tag can be printed. But consider how much easier it would be to just use a bag that has already been tagged.

I don't know if that is how the TSA does it. Doesn't really matter though. TSA screwed up.

About this:
it contained "an inert material"... and...screeners lost sight of the bag after the machine sounded an alarm
If it's inert, how did it trigger the bomb detection equipment? :scrutiny:
 
Last edited:
If it's inert, how did it trigger the bomb detection equipment?
It contains the chemicals the sniffer keys on if it is a sniffer type of detector, just not in an actual explosive compound. If it is the kind of detector that works based on density and a few other things, it uses a non-explosive that can generate a false-positive.

I believe the ones at newark use the detectors that care about density, they probably just pack something on their warning list like chocolate, peanut butter, or fruit cake.
 
Aw, give 'em a break gang.

They got distracted when they all had to go fill-in at the feel-up-the-travellers gate. Priorities and all.

Coulda happened to anyone ya kno!

:rolleyes:
 
A hamburger flipper provides a valuable service - providing nutrition to another human.

Now when a Newark TSA agent grabs me and tells me to turn my head and cough ......... well, I'm not sure what purpose that serves.

Newark TSA misses about 25% of all smuggled weapons attempts.
 
Looks like the 'bomb' was found:

Despite an hours-long search Tuesday night, the bag, containing a fake bomb complete with wires, a detonator and a clock, made it onto an Amsterdam-bound flight. It was recovered by airport security officials in Amsterdam when the flight landed several hours later.

Source: http://www.wnbc.com/news/3999360/detail.html

I'm just...Its...well I really don't have the right/polite words for this.

:banghead: :banghead:
 
I have traveled 5000 miles roundtrip in my truck with 6 firearms. None of my firearms ended up anywhere else - especially Amsterdam. All my firearms and ammo did not "go off " on anyone , anywhere, at anytime by themselves. They were used in a safe responsible manner, like targets or hunting.

I was not harassed, fondled, folded or mutilated either.

Folks wonder why I drive. I did a better job of protecting me than the Gummit proposes it can do now.

Granted I didn't have an in-flight movie - I did have coffee, and treats though.

I could smoke while traveling....and spotting a diner, whip into that parking lot...try that with a plane.
 
Lemme get this straight
Fake bomb sets off alarm!
Noone pushes the big red button that says stop?
Fake bomb not found?
Noone shuts down the terminal?
They think it went to Amsterdam?
Not likely, that bag went to Argentina, because that's where mine apparently go when they are "lost" by an airline
Weekly we hear at LAX that someone sneezes and 300+ flights get cancelled and 10.000 people get put out on the street and they never find the tissue.
We are stupider than the French, we can't even learn from their idiotic mistakes a week later.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top