Man allowed to board aircraft appeared to have bomb components

Status
Not open for further replies.

Desertdog

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,980
Location
Ridgecrest Ca
This sounds like it could have been a trial run. A more disturbing thought is what that if a co- conspirator had been on the same plane with explosives to pass on to him.

HPD, airport security at odds over incident
Man allowed to board aircraft appeared to have bomb components
By HARVEY RICE
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/4033752.html

Houston police and the federal Transportation Security Administration disagree over who is responsible for allowing a man with what appeared to be bomb components board an aircraft at Hobby Airport last week.


Although the FBI eventually cleared the man of wrongdoing, police officials have transferred the officer involved and are investigating the incident while insisting that the TSA, not police, has the authority to keep a suspicious person from boarding a flight.

"Our job is not to be the gatekeepers," police Capt. Dwayne Ready said. "That burden falls squarely on the airline and TSA to make that final decision.

"We are looking at our role in the situation to make sure our policies were adhered to," he said. "During follow-up, we are finding that there simply was not a material threat."

TSA spokeswoman Andrea McCauley said screeners have the authority to stop people from going beyond the checkpoint to the boarding areas, but they rely heavily on local police.

"It's just agencies talking with each other," Ready said, downplaying the disagreement.


Details of the dispute
McCauley and Ready would not comment about the June 26 incident, but a confidential TSA report obtained by the Houston Chronicle details a dispute between screeners and a police officer on duty at the airport.

The report states that a man with a Middle Eastern name and a ticket for a Delta Airlines flight to Atlanta shook his head when screeners asked if he had a laptop computer in his baggage, but an X-ray machine operator detected a laptop.

A search of the man's baggage revealed a clock with a 9-volt battery taped to it and a copy of the Quran, the report said. A screener examined the man's shoes and determined that the "entire soles of both shoes were gutted out."

No explosive material was detected, the report states. A police officer was summoned and questioned the man, examined his identification, shoes and the clock, then cleared him for travel, according to the report.

A TSA screener disagreed with the officer, saying "the shoes had been tampered with and there were all the components of (a bomb) except the explosive itself," the report says.

The officer retorted, "I thought y'all were trained in this stuff," TSA officials reported.

The report says the TSA screener notified Delta Airlines and talked again with the officer, who said he had been unable to check the passenger's criminal background because of computer problems.


FBI involvement
The incident gained enough attention at higher levels of the TSA that the FBI was asked to investigate. The TSA issued a statement saying its screeners "acted in accordance with their training and protocols."

FBI Special Agent Stephen Emmett in Atlanta said agents there investigated the passenger.

"It was looked at and deemed a non-event," Emmett said, declining to give further details.

Meanwhile the officer involved in the dispute, J.O. Reece, has been transferred to a desk job, "the same place they send officers who are relieved of duty," said Chad Hoffman, attorney for the Houston Police Officers Union.

Hoffman said Reece doesn't understand why he was transferred "when it seems clear from the onset of the investigation that he didn't have probable cause to detain anybody and that his actions were consistent with the law and HPD policy."

[email protected]
 
The TSA does not have the authority to deny boarding. That lies squarely with LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICALS. I read that memo regarding what happened is houston and the police there did not seethat man as a threat, even with the evidence the TSA confronted them with.
 
Someone could get an all-plastic grenade onto an airliner without a problem.


Simple pHE, larger amount of sHE, a bit of fuse, no metal, a friction igniter from matches, pullring from tape round about itself, etc.

No metal at all, quite deady still. Wonders of technology, I suppose. :)



EDIT: Re-reading the article, it appears that he had a clock with a battery taped to it (so he wouldn't lose it), a Koran (his Bible), and his shoes were of poor construction or hollowed out (the soles). So?

Be more afraid of the people you don't suspect, not the likely ones.
 
And on that day, the tsa confiscated six hundred fingernail files, two one piece plastic pistols the size of postage stamps, (suspected of belonging to GI Joe?), and three canes from people that said they needed them to walk. :banghead:
 
My guess is that it wasn't a practice run as much as it was a test run to check screeners. Things are too stereotypical. First, the name. Then, the laptop question was answered wrong. Second, a battery was taped to a clock, which is something you don't need to do for a bomb. Then there was the copy of the Quoran and the hollowed out shoes. All these things are meant to call attention to him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top