Uber sexy .22s

Status
Not open for further replies.

doctorhumbert

Member
Joined
May 21, 2003
Messages
265
Location
GA
Lately, I took interest in European .22 pistols. These things look awesome. I wonder how accurate they are? Anybody have one? They are very pricey.
fwb_aw93_cal22_g.jpg
208full.jpg

sp607.jpg
 
I don't have experience with any of the pistols you posted, but I have used a Walther GSP and Pardini 22 lr extensively.

Both have mechanical accuracy greater than pretty much any shooter I've ever seen.

When I switched from the Pardini to the Walther, my initial impression was that the Pardini was a bit more user friendly. Also, it's a touch lighter..whatever that's worth.

And yes, they do get quite 'spensive.
 
I have a pair of Walther GSPs - one in .22 LR and the other in .32 S&W Long. From a Ransom Rest they are as accurate as the ammo that goes through them.
 
From a Ransom Rest they are as accurate as the ammo that goes through them.
martin said it. The Ruger Competition Mark II is about as accurate as well. It's the trigger that kills the Mark II...its design limits it from ever being as good as top level .22s.

For that kind of money I'm sticking to my trusty S&W M41.
 
There is a Benelli that was imported by EAA a few years ago, maybe still is. Frighteningly accurate.
 
I have an older Pardini SPE .22 standard pistol. I've shot many different European target pistols, and the Pardini is my favorite.

I've never fired it from a Ransom Rest, but from a solid benchrest I have no trouble turning in ten-shot groups under an inch, center to center, at fifty yards.

In the interests of full disclosure, I can do the same thing with my Ruger MkII. But my bullseye scores are around 10 to 15 points higher (out of the 300-point NMC) with the Pardini. Making an accurate .22 pistol is not hard or expensive. What you're paying for when you buy a European uber-.22 are the perfect ergonomics, adjustable triggers, and fine sights. My Pardini isn't any more accurate than my MkII, but it is far, far more shootable.

- Chris

P.S. - if you're looking at getting into Bullseye pistol, or just buying a Euro .22 for fun, used Pardinis can sometimes be found for very good prices. I paid $600 for mine.
 
Those aren't free pistols

they're semiauto target guns. And they are lovely. I'v shot bullseye matches with a borrowed Hammerli 208s...exquisite.

I agree that they aren't more accurate than a Ruger MkII; it's all the other stuff that makes them easier to shoot up to their potential you're paying for.

I also agree that I'll stick with my Model 41.

Nygord often has used specimens at good prices:

www.nygord-precision.com
 
Thank you, actually that's where I got all the pic and information on above .22s:D I hope you didn't mind me borrowing site's pic.
Very informative site, though it's for the shooters across the border.

I never watched olympic shooting match, so how far do they shoot, and how good of shots are those olympic shooters?
 
Yes, they are good. As an additional note, air pistol is shot at 10m (approx. 33 feet, I believe).

The rapid fire shooters (men's event) are delivering 5 shots, one on each of 5 targets in 4 strings each, at 8 seconds, 6 seconds, and 4 seconds. Yes IPSC can have higher speed requirements, but the accuracy factor is alot higher as well, at 25m. If you can't regularly shoot 98-100 often, then you are in trouble. Free pistol (men's), sport pistol (women's) and air (both seperately) don't expect perfection, but if you're not regularly shooting 95%+, then you're not internationall competitive. And, relatively speaking, the 10 is very, very small.

Patrick
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top