UK: "No-jury trials in gun cases?"

Status
Not open for further replies.

cuchulainn

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
3,297
Location
Looking for a cow that Queen Meadhbh stole
I wonder if next they'll fully apply all the rules of the Diplock court system.

from the icTeesside site

http://icteesside.icnetwork.co.uk/0...d=50081&headline=No-jury trials in gun cases?
No-jury trials in gun cases?

Apr 11 2003

Home Secretary David Blunkett says the Government will consider trials without juries and greater protection for witnesses to help police crack the wall of silence surrounding fatal shootings and gun crime.

He pledged during a visit to Nottingham's Central Police Station to introduce new legislation to crack down on the guns and gang culture, and urged community leaders to provide better role models for young people.

Mr Blunkett said 8,000 guns, including 563 handguns, had been handed to police forces across the country since the launch of a month-long amnesty on March 31.

But more action was needed to tackle crimes involving firearms and to encourage people to come forward and give evidence.

"We are in the process of seeing how witnesses give evidence by video or with protection and also allowing there to be judge only trials," said the Home Secretary.

"Where there is very strong evidence of intimidation of witnesses or intimidation of the jury, we will propose that a judge sits alone."

He accepted that the plans would be controversial but urged people to support the idea to help the victims of gun crime.

"There is a degree of naivety about the evil that we are having to tackle and I urge everyone to support us," said Mr Blunkett.

He also hoped a new mandatory five-year minimum sentence for possessing illegal firearms would provide a stark warning to those who carry weapons.

"We are giving a clear message and providing a clear deterrent with the five-year minimum sentence and we hope that this gets the right response," said Mr Blunkett.

© owned by or licensed to Trinity Mirror Plc 2003
 
Rarely does a day pass when I fail to feel grateful to our forefathers for having rebelled against the English and founded a republic.

I believe England would have been much happier as a Nazi subject state: no need to bother with English common law, no need to make decisions, and of course, no need even to consider moral issues.
 
go for it, Standing Wolf! Maybe I could get up to 1492 posts by writing the same sentence every time I saw the word 'Bush' in a thread.
 
dont get me wrong, i agree with standing wolf 100%, the UK is turning into a bliss ninny nanny state (if it already wasn't there a long time ago). Their system will fail, they keep depriving thier subjects of more and more rights every year. I am guessing the quality of life is much lower there than here.
 
As dustind said "I am guessing the quality of life is much lower [in England] than here."

He is correct. I spent December of 2001 and of 2002 in London. At best it's a 1 1/2 world country.

Guadalaraha, Mexico's second largest city, is just as nice in quality of life terms. THe British delude themselves in thinking they are a "first world country" when, in fact, the USA is far ahead in almost every catagory that goes into quality of life. No wonder Wal-Mart is raising living standards all over the world.
 
OMG!!!:what:

I hope that article was a joke!

Just WTH is going on over there? Street crimes at an all time high and they still dont get it? Talk about closing your eyes and speeding toward oblivion!

Rarely does a day pass when I fail to feel grateful to our forefathers for having rebelled against the English and founded a republic.

Well said Standing Wolf. Say it again and again.
 
your correct that London is a one and a half world city; i am writing this on a typewriter using a borrowed ribbon while i listen to Mothers Hour on the wireless in my aluminium shack.

mexico city implied as better than London... yeah right. In fact, quality of life worldwide is nowhere higher than in Liverpool - where else can you see Everton play live every other week?

viva Moyes
 
2003041300170887.jpg


:cool: :D
 
Home Secretary David Blunkett says the Government will consider trials without juries and greater protection for witnesses to help police crack the wall of silence surrounding fatal shootings and gun crime.
Coming soon to an America near you.

We're fighting terrorism, after all, so we don't need to worry about technicalities like "speedy and public" trials or stuff like that. (Oops, a little thread cross-pollination there. Sorry 'bout that.)

pax

Quid rides? Mutato nomine de te fabula narratur. -- Horace
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top