UK: "The Arsenal of Murder" - or not, as it turns out

Status
Not open for further replies.

iapetus

Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2003
Messages
614
Location
UK
I think there was a discussion here about this investigation when it first came out, so you might like to know how it turned out in the end.

(Essentially: police seize massive load of guns, claim to have broken up a criminal gun smuggling ring, turns out it was an innocent antique dealer. As quite a few people speculated all along).

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6223750.stm

When is a gun not a gun?
By Chris Summers
BBC News

A gun dealer specialising in antique firearms has been acquitted of selling weapons which the prosecution had claimed could have ended up in the hands of gangsters.

The trial highlighted a "grey area" in the 1968 Firearms Act.

Michael Shepherd (court sketch by Julia Quenzler)
Shepherd was undoubtedly an eccentric figure

On 13 September 2006, amid a great deal of media fanfare, police officers swooped on a house in Dartford, Kent, and claimed to have busted a huge gun-smuggling racket.

The Daily Star used the banner headline "The Arsenal of Murder" while the Mirror quoted a Scotland Yard source as saying: "We believe guns sold via this business may have been used in at least 14 gang-related shootings in London, including three murders."

Nine months later, the only man arrested on that day - Mick Shepherd - has walked free from the Old Bailey after being found not guilty of 13 firearms charges.


FIREARMS LAW
All handguns have been banned in the UK since 1996
The only exceptions are for "antique" weapons
Section 58 of the 1968 Firearms Act does not define "antique" and it is for the police and the courts to consider each case on its merits
"Antique" weapons include flintlocks, muzzle-loading guns and anything of obsolete calibre
Obsolete calibre means a cartridge of a type which is no longer manufactured, for example .465 Webley

Dealer cleared

It emerged during the trial that the 900 guns found at Mr Shepherd's home were legally held and he had done nothing wrong.

Eccentrically dressed in country and western style suits and sporting an Elvis quiff, Mr Shepherd came across as a slightly comical figure.

But spending nine months in prison is no laughing matter, especially for a 56-year-old man with a sick and elderly mother.

Legal exemption

So what went wrong with what police described as Operation Mokpo?

The case revolves around an "antique firearm" exemption in the 1968 Firearms Act.

Under Section 58 of the legislation dealers are entitled to sell certain weapons as "curiosities or ornaments".

Mark Gadsden, prosecuting, explained to the jury what that meant in practice: "If an individual has a genuine old Wild West type revolver, such as those depicted in cowboy films, in a display case above the mantelpiece of his or her living room - with no intention of doing anything untoward with it - then it will fall within the exemption.

A Luger pistol
This Luger, was one of the guns which got Mr Shepherd in trouble

"If, however, that individual takes that same revolver out of its display case and uses it to commit an armed bank robbery then the exemption does not apply because, while the antique nature of the firearm has not changed, it is no longer being possessed as a curiosity or ornament."

Police sent two undercover officers, "Liam" and "Tommy", to see Mr Shepherd and discuss the purchase of weapons from him.

These included a Belgian revolver, a French service revolver, a Smith and Wesson which had been altered to fire Russian military issue .44 bullets and a British Bulldog .32 calibre pistol. All of them had been advertised on his website, Mick's Guns.

Over the next few months Liam and Tommy covertly recorded conversations with Mr Shepherd. In them he spoke about what ammunition could be used in the weapons but it was unclear whether he was encouraging them to do so or just "shooting the breeze".

When the police raided him on 13 September 2006, the story was covered widely in the media, with several reporters claiming the guns were linked to a number of murders.

But when it came to his trial there was no mention of any of Mr Shepherd's guns ever being used in murders or indeed any crimes.

Indeed several charges were dropped and in the end most of the allegations surrounded the sting operation.

After the verdict, the Metropolitan Police said: "The Met Police presented all the evidence at court and respect the jury's decision."

Some of the firearms found
One expert said the collection was "historically significant"

The arrest of Mr Shepherd came as a massive shock to firearms expert and journalist Mike Yardley who, like many in the shooting and gun collecting community, feels he has been badly treated.

Mr Yardley, who is also spokesman for the Shooting Sports Trust, said he visited Mr Shepherd's home a few months before his arrest and saw nothing suspicious.

'Tremendous collection'

He told the BBC News website: "He came across as a harmless eccentric. He certainly had a tremendous collection of firearms which was of vast historical significance and was a real expert on transitional weapons from the period 1850-1880."

There seems to be widespread sympathy for Mr Shepherd from the gun community, who feel he has been victimised.

The editor of Sporting Shooter magazine, James Marchington, said there seemed to be a grey area as far as the antique exemption was concerned.

He said: "There is no requirement for a dealer to make a judgement as to the intended use. You sell it for what it is and you follow the rules.

"You are not expected to make a judgement about what the person intends to do with it."
 
Typical...

Typical drive-by media jackal hype. Imagine if he had had an inert pineapple grenade on his counter with a "take a number" tag on it, the tag having the number "1" on it...
 
I hate journalists sometimes& nowdays anti-gun British cops too.Ive met Shepard once at Dartford gun club.He's a nice bloke.Yardies wouldn't go near Shepard with a bargepole.They get their guns illegally imported,via containerships& small boats,like how Cornish smugglers,used to smuggle goods in Cornwall,in the 19th Century.
 
It emerged during the trial that the 900 guns found at Mr Shepherd's home were legally held and he had done nothing wrong.

Were the guns returned (or accidently destroyed)?

Edit to add: Wow, this is an old post!
 
old yes, but unfortunately it is a recurring theme. Law enforcement spends a disporpotionate amount of resources going after someone doing something that is actually legal, the biased anti-gun news media play it up as much worse than it is to sell fish wrapper (newspapers), and when the case comes out in court the facts are nowhere near the original charges. By that time, the pool of public opinion has been polluted by the anti-gun hype, and the cynicism of the antigovernment opinion is reinforced. Everyone loses.

Except the gun smugglers. A lot of law enforcement resources that might have been devoted to gun criminals has been spendt going after a legit gun owner.
 
Det Chief Insp Reed added: 'What does a normal member of society need with a firearm? 'When we looked at his computer, we discovered he had an unhealthy interest in firearms.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...g-picture-automatic-pistol.html#ixzz0kRhQKiSp
Well DCI Reed,look at these particular gun club members,on this website,before you cast judgement on,what normal members of society,needs with firearms.:p:neener::rolleyes::rolleyes:
http://www.policesportuk.com/
This club is for Police officers, serving and retired, and Police civilians, who have common interest in both target rifle and 'F' class shooting.
http://www.ukpfbtrc.org.uk/:rolleyes:

So then,me thinks the cops should look at themselves in the mirror,before they make complete jackases of themselves...LOL.

This British Pakastani muslim man,was a bit stupid to pose with his replica guns anyway,especially if it was supposidly 'converted'.If he was a normal gun club member,posing with a gun or was on a film set,then no one would have cared.No one can tell the difference over here-they're that ignorant.
 
Last edited:
I fail to see how imprisoning somebody for 5 years with no prior criminal record nor gang affiliation for possession of a semi-auto pistol that fires blanks is somehow doing anything constructive.

an I.T. consultant with a semi-auto pistol that fires blanks :rolleyes:

I've no doubt he will come out the other end of the British judicial system after 5 years of prison more criminalised than when he went in.

It's absolutely absurd.
 
I fail to see how imprisoning somebody for 5 years with no prior criminal record nor gang affiliation for possession of a semi-auto pistol that fires blanks is somehow doing anything constructive
The blank firer was apparently a 'converted gun'& so if its converted,its an instant 5 year jail sentence.They also targeted him as well,I believe,because of his ethnic background&religion,on the basis,he might be linked to Islamic terrorism.
We don't know the full story,but it appears that he might of acted violently or aggressively,with his gun,or he might of threatened someone,prompting someone to rat on him,to the cops,who might of checked out facebook-as its one of the worlds most popular networking site.
My friend has pictures of blank guns,from his films on there& even with the actor holding them.
But then again,the thought police & the gun-burners are out in force.Then again 8mm,is the original calibre,for the blank bullets anyway,so the Daily Mail got that bit,all wrong,didn't they?Conversions are junk guns.
 
Last edited:
I'm 100% convinced that the person in question has no links whatsoever to Islamic terrorism or acted in a threatening/agressive manner - why? Because it would be all over that article if it were the case given how utterly sensational the entire tone of the article is to begin with.

Like 99% of UK media reports when it comes to firearms the purpose is to scaremonger the public.

The judge isn't obliged to give the minimum sentence. He could just as easily fined him GBP 25,000 (pay off the increasingly crippling UK national debt) and given him 1,000 hours of community service to be fulfilled within a 2 year period in light of the extraordinary circumstances.

I would argue one could just as easily set an example with the above sentence.

Instead that guy will get gang raped in prison and resort to drugs to escape or worse yet commit suicide behind bars.

all because he posted a picture of himself with a blank firing 'SEMI-auto' pistol on facebook.
 
It comes to something when we have to be careful who we tell about our hobby.

I actually have a pic on facebook of myself firing a 'semi-auto pistol'. However, its clearly on a range and since the sun is shining in the pic it was clearly not taken in England :D

I do have pics of some of my rifles on there too, all legally owned. This has seriously made me consider removing them. Which is silly, a golfer wouldnt get in trouble for posting a pic of himself holding a golf club :cuss:
 
I do have pics of some of my rifles on there too, all legally owned. This has seriously made me consider removing them. Which is silly, a golfer wouldnt get in trouble for posting a pic of himself holding a golf club
You'll be fine mate,as the cops who trawled facebook,were tipped off,by a 'concerned person' in the Pakastani community.I've seen people posing with airsoft guns,etc& no one cared enough.At the end of the day,if its on the range then its alright-part of the sport.By the way,some of these club members were coppers themselves.
As long as you aren't in cammo& have a heading like 'suburban slaughter' etc...lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top