Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

unburnt powder with 2400 in .357

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by SSN Vet, Aug 22, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SSN Vet

    SSN Vet Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    5,796
    Location:
    The Dark Side of the Moon
    Most of the load data I've seen states that mag. primers are not required for 2400 loads in magnum revolvers.

    But I get what seems to me like a lot of black granules on the shooting bench when I shoot my .357 mag loads with 2400.

    Will switching to mag. primers (and backing off and re-working up my loads) give more complete powder burn?

    Just as an aside, I've been reading up on 9x23 WIN lately and was surprised to read that guys out there who seem to be in the know are using small rifle primers in that cartridge. Has anyone heard of using rifle primers in other pistol cartridge applications?

    I'm not about to experiment with anything that's not well docuemented.... and am hoping it is "safe" to at least ask the question and seek out references.
     
  2. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    What is your load data?

    2400 will not burn clean in reduced load applications, regardless of primers.
    At full pressure, it does pretty well.

    If you are not loading pretty close to the max pressure with 2400, you need to switch to a faster powder like Unique, etc.

    The black grains you are seeing are just powder "skeletons" or the remains of the grains that burned.
    I'd speculate if you collected up enough to try burning a pile of them, they are already burned and won't burn any more..

    rc
     
  3. res45

    res45 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2007
    Messages:
    563
    Location:
    North Carolina
    My general purpose load in 357 is 12.5 grs. of 2400 with a 158 gr. cast bullets,as rcmodel mentioned your going to get some of those powder skeletons left in the pistol bore. I love 2400 it meters well and I use it for both rifle and pistol loads.
     
  4. CraigC
    • Contributing Member

    CraigC Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2006
    Messages:
    15,270
    Location:
    West Tennessee
    While not as pressure-happy as H110 and 296, 2400 likes to be run near full steam. If you're getting a lot of what looks like unburned powder, up your charge.
     
  5. gamestalker

    gamestalker member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2008
    Messages:
    9,832
    Location:
    SW Arizona
    As already mentioned, 2400 isn't as slow burning as H110/296 but it does need to be within listed data range to perform efficiently. I've not seen any 2400 data for the .357 mag. that dictates a mag. primer, so I would probably not switch primer's.
    I load with H110/296 exclusively and can attest to the fact that powder charges near or below the minimum listed data doesn't perform efficiently, and will produce powder skeletons. You need more pressure to reduce those if you are in fact loading below or near the botton of the data.
    Give us the load your using at this point so we can try to more accurately diagnose the cause of your concern.
     
  6. OldmanFCSA

    OldmanFCSA Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    230
    Location:
    Osceola, Wisconsin
    Use 296 - it works best as a near max loading - results are very good with Hornady 140 & 180 XTP's. I use a 6" GP100. 18 & 13 grains respectively.
     
  7. Master Blaster

    Master Blaster Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,912
    Location:
    Delaware home of tax free shopping
    also make sure you have a good roll crimp, poor crimp can cause reduced pressure and incomplete burn.
     
  8. SSN Vet

    SSN Vet Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    5,796
    Location:
    The Dark Side of the Moon
    here's the load...

    158 gr. Zero JSP
    13.8 gr. A2400
    Win. std. small pistol primer
    1.58 COAL
    Firm roll crimp
    Fed. .357 mag. brass

    according to my notes:
    1. load is pretty warm, just shy of factory Federal 158s
    2. load is more accurate than my attempts at downloading rounds (11 gr. A2400)
    3. lot's of unburned powder

    I've never heard of powder skeletons before. They were black sphears.

    I'm shooting a 20 year old, lightly used and well cared for Taurus 689 with a 6.5" vent rib barrel.
     
  9. Steve C

    Steve C Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,696
    You can drive pressures up using magnum primers with 2400. Not that they can't be used, but the load needs to be worked up and you're likely to see pressure sign before reaching the maximum load in the manuals. Currently Speer specifically recommends standard primers only with 2400 and notes pressure problems with mag primers if you use their data developed with standard primers.

    I've seen pressure signs, pierced, cratered and leaking primers when using CCI magnum primers and approaching 14.0 grs of 2400 with 158gr jacketed Speer bullets many years ago (1975).
     
  10. Josh45

    Josh45 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2011
    Messages:
    1,118
    Im glad this thread came up.

    Im using 11.0 Grains under a 158 Gr Plated FP. At least now I know to expect unburnt powder seeing as I used a SPP rather than a SMPP. Im thinking the roll crimp I gave it should help it tho.

    Sorry, Don't mean to hijack your thread.
     
  11. SSN Vet

    SSN Vet Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    5,796
    Location:
    The Dark Side of the Moon
    new target load for .357 revolver....

    oops... meant to start a new thread with this one....
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page