Quantcast

Underwood 9mm & .40 S&W Hard Cast in Clear Ballistics Gel

Discussion in 'Handguns: General Discussion' started by 5pins, Jun 11, 2019.

  1. 5pins

    5pins Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2003
    Messages:
    155
    9xSp4jvl.jpg

    Test Gun: Sig P226
    Barrel length: 4.4 inches
    Ammunition: Underwood 9mm 147gr Hard Cast, .40 S&W Hard Cast
    Test media: 10% Clear Ballistics Gel.
    Distance: 10 feet.
    Chronograph: Caldwell Ballistic Precision Chronograph G2.
    Five shot velocity average:1085, 942fps
    Gel Temperature 70 degrees.

    The discussion of what to carry in the field seems to come up often on the various online forums. It normally revolves around the best caliber and load for bear protection. I would say most peoples first reaction if asked, is to pick a .44 magnum or some other large bore revolver. When talking about semi-auto pistols the 10mm is normally the default answer. The .45 ACP/ .45 Super is often brought up as a viable option to the 10mm and as we have seen in my past test with the right load it can perform very well. To a lesser extent, the option of the 9mm or .40 S&W will be considered.


    With is in mine and after testing the Underwood Xtreme Penetrator I grab some hard cast loadings from Underwood. Two of them were the 9mm 147gr +P hard cast and the .40 S&W 200gr hard cast.

    Underwood lists their hard cast bullets as a.

    "Hi -Tek Coated Hard Cast Flat Nose 21 BHN".


    "Hi-Tek coating allows you to enjoy the benefits of a hard-cast projectile and the cleanliness normally seen in copper jacketed/plated rounds.

    Hi-Tek is a polymer based compound* that not only reduces fouling in your barrel, but also substantially reduces airborne lead contamination (allowing for use in some indoor ranges). The elimination of the wax lubrication combined with the reduced airborne lead contamination results in considerably less smoke produced with each shot. Hard cast flat nose bullets are non-expanding, powerfully penetrative
    bullets that are designed with your woods defense needs in mind; whether fending off wild hogs or black bears, the hard cast flat nose bullets
    are consistently effective in taking down any wild animals that you may encounter".

    Both of these rounds were shot out of a Sig P226 with a 4.4-inch barrel.


    Starting with the 9mm I got an average 5 shot velocity of 1085fps with a high of 1091fps and a low of 1081fps. This was 15fps lower than the advertised velocity of 1100fps. The recoil was very manageable and about what you would expect from a 9mm +P. The spent cases didn't appear to show any signs of excessive pressure when compared to the Winchester "white box" 124gr standard pressure. There were no malfunctions or failures with this round.


    With the .40 S&W, I got an average 5 shot velocity of 942fps with a high of 952fps and a low of 938fps. This was 58fps lower than the advertised velocity of 1000fps. Like the 9mm this load was very controllable. Spent cases didn't show any signs of excessive pressure when compared to the Federal 180gr HST loading. There were also no malfunctions or failures when shooting this round.

    L5LJ5Svl.jpg
    5 rounds offhand at 10 yards 9mm

    c7WODBal.jpg
    5 rounds offhand at 10 yards .40 S&W

    tMPIjz5l.jpg
    9mm case comparison

    lJNP7Wpl.jpg
    .40 S&W case comparison

    So how will they perform in the gel? To find out I used the same set up I used with the Underwood Xtreme Penetrator testing. Four 16 inch blocks of Clear Gel for the two bare gel shots and two through the 20 gauge steel plate at 30 degrees.


    Round one from the 9mm was shot int the upper left corner of the gel block and passed completely through the four gel blocks and was caught with the body armor placed at the end. The only other round to pass through all four blocks was the Double Tap 10mm 200gr FMJ. The velocity of the first round was 1074fps and the recovered weight was 147.1 grains. Round two in the bare gel was shot in the upper right-hand corner had a velocity of 1086fps and also pass through all four blocks of gel. The recovered weight was 146.4 grains

    nGbHWuFl.jpg

    Shooting the 9mm through the sheet metal the first round penetrated to 18.75 inches. Velocity was not recorded and the recovered weight was 137.1 grains. The second rounds velocity was 1091fps and it penetrated to 18.5 inches. The Recovered weight was 134 grains.

    8iEAv9gl.jpg

    Now on to the .40 S&W. The first round in the bare gel had a velocity of 958fps and penetrated to 52 inches. The recovered weight was196.6 grains. Round two hit the bare gel blocks at a velocity of 959fps and penetrated to 52.5 inches. The recovered weight was also 196.6 grains.

    LtFeokHl.jpg

    When shooting through the sheet metal the velocity of the first round was 955fps and penetrated to a depth of 17 inches. The recovered weight was 190.6 grains. The second round had a velocity of 959fps and penetrated to 16.25 inches. It's recovered weight was 188.4 grains.

    rUkHpDcl.jpg

    If we compare these rounds to the 9mm and .40 S&W Xtreme Penetrators that the hard cast bullets in 9mm penetration completely went through all four blocks, 64 inches, of gel. The Xtreme 115gr penetrators went to 47 and 47.5 inches. That's around 17 inches or one complete block of gel. Through the sheet metal, the depths were much closer. The Underwood's hard cast went 18.5 and 18.75 inches to the Xtreme's 16.5 and 18 inches. Closer but the hard cast still beat the Xtreme Penetrators.


    With the .40 S&W, the hard cast beat the Xtreme bullets by a large margin, 52 and 52.5 inches to the Xtreme's 22.5 and 23 inches. Through the sheet metal, the Xtreme proved to be the better penetrator with 17 and 18.5 inches compared to the hard cast 16.25 and 17. Better, but not by much.

    4y1T367l.jpg
     
    1KPerDay likes this.
  2. 1KPerDay

    1KPerDay Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    15,061
    Location:
    Happy Valley, UT
    Thanks for this. Question: can you see the bullet paths in the gel from these non expanding bullets? How do you ensure that they haven't left the block at some point? Do they generall "fly" pretty straight?
     
  3. IdaD

    IdaD Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2018
    Messages:
    221
    Location:
    Idaho
    In either caliber it looks like a winner for woods carry ammo. I generally carry a 9mm in the woods so I ought to pick up a box.
     
  4. derek45

    derek45 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2007
    Messages:
    67
    interesting

    thanks for posting this
     
  5. 5pins

    5pins Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2003
    Messages:
    155
    Yes, I can see the tracks and generally they are straight. Sometimes they will leave the block but most of the time it's because I haven't lined up properly in front of the block. The more blocks I have lined up the harder it is.
     
    1KPerDay likes this.
  6. JTQ

    JTQ Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2009
    Messages:
    6,858
    Location:
    NW Florida
    One advantage to truncated cone or semi-wadcutters over ball ammo is they typically travel pretty straight through media, while the ball rounds tend to yaw somewhat and often curve in the same media.
     
    1KPerDay likes this.
  7. roscoe

    roscoe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    2,500
    Location:
    NV
    Short of reloading, this is the best deal, pricewise, for hardcast 9mm rounds that I have found. Perhaps the coating keeps the price down by eliminating the need for gas checks.
     
  8. 1KPerDay

    1KPerDay Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    15,061
    Location:
    Happy Valley, UT
    Has anyone ever tested for any performance difference in tissue between sharper edged, uncoated lead. HC and slippery coated lead?
     
  9. TomJ
    • Contributing Member

    TomJ Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2014
    Messages:
    1,691
    Location:
    Illinois
    Thanks for the review. We’re going to be hiking is Wisconsin in a week and I’m limited as to what I can carry due to back and neck problems which I’m almost, but not completely recovered from. I picked up this 9mm ammo for woods carry in a 4 inch Shield. I shot some through the Shield and a P365 yesterday and the recoil was much less than I anticipated.
     
  10. roo_ster

    roo_ster Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2003
    Messages:
    3,158
    Location:
    USA
    Thank you for this test.

    I thought the hard cast would beat out the Lehigh bullets. I was not sure about .40S&W vs the 9mm, though.

    If you don't want the mass or recoil of a big bore revolver, these are reasonable substitutes akin to the hard cast wadcutters I use in my .38spl snubby.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice