When an AK weapon is referred to by the press, it is an "AK-47" because they don't know any better.
I don't see why folks are coming down so hard on the media in this case about calling the rifle an AK-47. The police specifically stated that the rifle was an AK-47 in several interviews and it was noted in the OP specifically.
Police confirmed Tooley was carrying an AK-47
I watched some of the updates and the press conference. "AK-47" was stated several times by the police. What was reported was accurate based on the "facts" provided to them. When they show footage of the police calling the gun an AK-47 or providing a quote from the cops calling it an AK-47, do you think they should then call it something else?
We are soooo worried about the press getting this right, and yet even when they reported accurately the information provided to them by the proper sources, we still think they are in error and that they should have known better and ergo should have reported something else.
Given that the cops have the gun and not the press, there is no reason to disparage the press over calling the gun an AK-47. The reporting was accurate.
As hso said,
If we here use "AK-47" for semi AK variants then why would we expect anything else from others. Just search the term in Rifle Country and you'll get tons of hits from our own members "good/best AK47", "AK47 vs. AR15/SKS/chocolate cake" and on and on.
It is just a little disingenuous for us to decry the use of the term in the media when we're as guilty of it.
The NRA seems quite comfortable with calling AK-47 pattern guns in semi automatic AK-47s. Why isn't anyone shouting about how the NRA is deliberately blurring the line between semi-auto and fully-auto guns?
Ayoob calls semi-auto versions of the AK-47, "AK-47"
http://www.backwoodshome.com/articles2/ayoob116.html
Since he writes articles, does that make him the "media" now?