Oh buddy, oh buddy. My kind of shooter. 35 will absolutely hammer those rams. The 38/357 158s work well, but not like a 170 grain jhp(sierra because I already had them). 35 grains of 2520 with a hard crimp. My oh my how that runs in my 336.
Me too, except the vintage production guns are soooooooooo expensive: $1500 for a Savage 99, $1000 for a Ruger 77, $3500 for a Winchester 88, $4000 for a Winchester 70, etc. Lots of rifles converted to .358 are out there for less of course.A .358 Winchester would be my first pick.
How much is '06 now? I checked last week in local stores and $23/20 is the best price I've found.Based on at I saw on store shelves during the last run, 30.06 is the way to go. In the height of the 9mm/223/762/22 drought insanity, 30.06 was still plentiful and never really changed in price.
Unpopular- Check.
109 years old give or take- Check.
There you go, old and unpopular- yet availbale.
Got a buddy this happened to. Got lucky, caught him in the jaw and the scar alone gets onlookers wherever he goes.Vanitas;
If you want old, and extremely unpopular, why check into the .280 Ross. The cartridge itself was fine, the rifle, well it had problems. It was a Canadian military item in the very early 1900's. The cartridge would propel a 140 grain bullet to approximately 2900 fps with the powders of the day. I'd expect that better performance could be had these days.
The problem was the rifle. It had the odd little quirk of allowing the bolt to separate from the action upon firing. The bolt then tended to rapidly move into the head of the person firing the gun. This caused complaints from the troops. It seems that after the gun was cleaned it was really rather easy to make a mistake in reassembly that would allow the deadly condition.
I can take pretty long odds that you'll be the only one on any range to be shooting the .280 Ross.
900F