Jim: it seems Ahhnold is very open to getting info from you guys. Is this new or was Davis just as open?
This is SO new.
Trust me. Night and day difference.
We did have one very convoluted back-channel into Davis' office, for a while: Assemblyman Rod Wright is a Democrat and was an early Davis supporter. Rod is also really pro-RKBA, so while he was in office he basically was our back-channel. Not a very high-bandwidth connection though. Then he left office and we had squat.
If Ahhnold started this it makes me feel better about him as guv -- at least he's reaching out for al the facts.
Yup, and it's even better than that: he's consistently making sure that staffers who KNOW a given subject study the bills in that field as veto candidates for reports to his desk.
Nowhere is this more apparant than on gun bills. But he's doing it across the board. Decisions are getting evaluated on their technical merits, whereas under Davis the FIRST and foremost consideration was always political.
Night and day, folks.
Now, that doesn't mean that Arnold may not put HIS personal political spin on each bill once he has the analysis. OK? Some bills may get past him. SB1140 in particular looks like it might have legs due to the support of the district attorneys, and it's already been severely watered down from it's initial state.
Hmmm.
OK, here's the deal on that thing: right now, if a parent gives a kid PERMISSION to access a gun even when said parent isn't around, and said kid screws up and blows another kid's head off, the parent isn't liable. This is exactly what happened in Placer County. The Placer DA brought a bill to Jack Scott to fix that ONE issue. Scott got all gleeful, greedy and stupid and tacked on a pile of other stuff...the DA was actually upset at that.
*Most* of the Scott additions have been stripped out...for example, under the current revision of SB1140 you're now in good shape as a parent if you keep the gun loaded and locked in a bedside safe or behind a cable lock or similar, OR you keep the gun unloaded and the ammo nowhere near it.
Naturally, we don't want this to pass. One good argument against is that the definition of "loaded" is now being confused with this "ammo proximity" issue. But I suspect it's going to get to Arnold's desk, and I suspect he might pass it.
The situation is MUCH better for SB1152, the ammo registration bill. Y'all have helped there! That one's in big trouble as is SB1733, the Cow Palace gun show ban.
AB50, crapshoot, danged if I know how that one will play out. There's cost problems: the state would have to run a whole new awareness campaign like they did for the SKS, AWs, etc...money is so tight right now that will matter.