Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow
member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2007
- Messages
- 13,146
Is there any special or particular problems/issues in using the 1917 receiver, when it comes to mating the barrel or whathaveyou, as compared to the "standards" (98 Mauser, Rem 700, Winchester 70, etc.)?
Is it generally a good/fine base action to use? I'm wanting to have someone build a custom 6.5mm-'06 for me, and I have this old sporterized 1917 lying around with the original .30-06 barrel, and was wondering if this would be a good choice as a starting point, to send to my 'smith of choice? Obviously, my goal is extreme accuracy here, so want to choose the best action for that, but if I can save a little money by using an existing action on a rifle I don't shoot much, and it won't hamper the gunsmith, then so much the better. My understanding is that these are super strong, and therefore a pretty good choice. But any issues as far as good trigger, drilling for scope bases, etc.? Are drop-in triggers even out there?
Also, who do you recommend as a custom builder for a heavy benchrest / longrange rifle like this? Thanks.
Is it generally a good/fine base action to use? I'm wanting to have someone build a custom 6.5mm-'06 for me, and I have this old sporterized 1917 lying around with the original .30-06 barrel, and was wondering if this would be a good choice as a starting point, to send to my 'smith of choice? Obviously, my goal is extreme accuracy here, so want to choose the best action for that, but if I can save a little money by using an existing action on a rifle I don't shoot much, and it won't hamper the gunsmith, then so much the better. My understanding is that these are super strong, and therefore a pretty good choice. But any issues as far as good trigger, drilling for scope bases, etc.? Are drop-in triggers even out there?
Also, who do you recommend as a custom builder for a heavy benchrest / longrange rifle like this? Thanks.