US cuts off military aid to countries unwilling to give indemnity to US forces

Status
Not open for further replies.

Preacherman

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
13,306
Location
Louisiana, USA
From the Telegraph, London (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...02.xml&sSheet=/news/2003/07/02/ixnewstop.html):

US military aid stopped in court immunity rift
By Toby Harnden in Washington
(Filed: 02/07/2003)


The United States yesterday cut off military aid to almost 50 countries that have refused to sign immunity deals exempting American citizens from prosecution by the International Criminal Court.

Allies such as Colombia and South Africa, six countries seeking Nato membership and states that strongly supported the Iraq war were on the list.

The move was partly symbolic because much of the money in the current financial year has already been spent but the ban could still be in effect when the new year starts in October.

Colombia, where President Alvaro Uribe's government is fighting IRA-aided Marxist narco-terrorists, has been one of the largest recipients of American military aid, with £60 million this year.

The £3 million still not spent has now been frozen.

As the deadline passed for governments to sign exemption agreements, known as Article 98s, or face the suspension of military aid, President George W Bush issued waivers for 22 countries.

Many diplomats condemned the ban as heavy-handed and cutting across American priorities such as anti-drug operations in the Caribbean and expanding Nato.

Of the seven eastern European countries joining Nato in May, only Romania signed a deal on the ICC.

The Bush administration is implacably opposed to the court, which it believes could be used to pursue politically inspired prosecutions by anti-American zealots.

Last year, Mr Bush withdrew America's signature, one of Bill Clinton's last acts as president, from the Treaty of Rome, which established the ICC and was ratified by more than 90 countries, including Britain.

That signalled the start of an intensive diplomatic campaign to cajole nearly 180 countries into signing Article 98s before the court opened for business yesterday.

The withdrawal of aid, enshrined in the American Service Members Protection Act of 2002, does not apply to the 19 current Nato members and to nine "major non-Nato allies".
 
Why limit it to military aid? These countries should have all their freebies cut off. If this kangaroo court (ICC) should ever indict any US citizen all freebies should be stopped to any country that signed on to this piece of crap. And that's how I feel about it and I'll stick with it for awhile.:fire:
 
An interesting observation about this morning's coverage in the Washington Times and the ComPost:

TIMES headline "U.S. Withholds Military Aid from 32 Nations"

ComPost headline (deep inside Section A) US Approves Military Aid Package.

Sort of a half-full, half-empty disparity.

TC
TFL Survivor
 
Good. If countries are doing actions that are contrary to US interests they shouldn't be getting from American taxpayers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top