USA: "NAACP: one of the few to take on the gun lobby"

Status
Not open for further replies.

cuchulainn

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
3,297
Location
Looking for a cow that Queen Meadhbh stole
from the Nashville (TN) City Paper

http://www.nashvillecitypaper.com/index.cfm?section_id=40&screen=news&news_id=22143
NAACP: one of the few to take on the gun lobby

Commentary by Ron Wynn
April 21, 2003

Precious few organizations are currently willing to battle the gun lobby, but the NAACP is bucking that trend. They recently filed suit against 80 gun manufacturers and wholesalers, alleging that due to their indiscriminate distribution practices, African Americans and other minorities are experiencing a disproportionately higher number of deaths and injuries from gun violence, especially among teens.

This case is now being heard in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, with a 12-member jury ruling only in an advisory capacity since the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People isn’t seeking damages but injunctive relief. Still, there’s little doubt that the group is fighting an uphill battle.

The House of Representatives has already voted 285-140 to support legislation that would protect gun manufacturers and dealers from liability by giving them immunity from lawsuits brought by victims of gun violence as well as lawsuits brought by cities to stop the negligent distribution of guns. The bill, officially H.R. 1036/S.659, is also being supported by President Bush, who is officially on the record saying, “The manufacturer or seller of a legal, non-defective product should not be held liable for the criminal or unlawful misuse of that product by others.â€

With the administration leading the way, Senate approval and ultimate passage isn’t very far behind. Despite these sizeable obstacles, the NAACP has presented evidence in court obtained from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms they claim demonstrates that guns used to commit crimes can be traced to transactions that the industry knew beforehand would lead to illegal weapons sales.

They also introduced as an expert witness Robert A. Ricker, former executive director of the American Shooting Sports Council. Ricker was once a prominent lobbyist for the National Rifle Association. He says he had a change of attitude after he began negotiations with the Clinton administration in 1989 to make changes in gun laws aimed at weeding out corrupt dealers. Ricker alleges that the NRA disbanded his organization and eliminated his job because they are violently opposed to any gun control legislation.

“A lot of people in the industry were prepared to make changes, to even negotiate a settlement with the cities over the lawsuits,†Ricker told The New York Times April 7. “But we have Charlton Heston and Wayne LaPierre (the NRA’s top two officers) dictating to us on guns. People in the industry are scared to death of them.â€

The NRA dismisses Ricker’s testimony as the words of a disgruntled, disloyal former employee trying to get back at the organization that fired him. They also dispute his expertise and deny his testimony will carry any weight.

The NAACP also must acknowledge that not everyone, possibly not even a majority of African Americans, considers the greed of gun manufacturers the principal reason for disproportionate violence in the black community. Many other things — be they rap lyrics, video games, even kung fu movies — are mentioned ahead of prevalence of guns.

The group also must consider that individuals should take responsibility for choices they freely make, and that numerous Americans simply don’t feel safe in their homes without guns. A majority of citizens seem more than willing to accept the consequences of this society’s weapons proliferation so long as their access to guns remains unlimited.

Thus, in the end, the NAACP may not only be waging an impossible battle, but they also might discover they are not being fully supported by the constituency they are trying to help.

Ron Wynn is a City Paper staff writer.
Copyright 2003 The City Paper,LLC
 
How does working to deprive them of their 2nd amendment rights advance the rights of "colored people"?
 
Despite these sizeable obstacles, the NAACP has presented evidence in court obtained from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms they claim demonstrates that guns used to commit crimes can be traced to transactions that the industry knew beforehand would lead to illegal weapons sales.
Quotes like this crack me up. "The industry knew beforehand would lead to illegal sales" is used as a reason for not selling a product in the first place.

By that standard, we need to ban the sale of:
  • cars (because the automotive industry knows beforehand that some cars will be stolen and resold illegally)
  • prescription drugs (a big-ticket black market item; surely the pharmaceutical companies know this, yet they pander their narcotics to hospitalized people every day)
  • concert tickets (scalping is a fact of life)
  • sports event tickets (scalping, again)
  • music (CDs are known to be illegally copied. In fact, many of you reading this are already equipped to commit this crime)
  • Movies on tape or DVD (copying, again)
  • watches (taken by muggers and re-sold to fences; everyone, including the timepiece industry, knows that some watches will be stolen)
  • purses (fences, again. Oh, the perfidy of the handbag industry)
Hmm. What products are for sale that have *never* been known to be stolen and re-sold illegally? Copies of "Oprah" magazine? What else?

-BP
 
So NAACP supports Jim Crow...*** is going to be next, NAACP supports slavery?
 
Lets see, there is a disproportionate rate of gun violence in the balck community. Therefore, rather than litigate, lets introduce legislation to ban blacks from owning guns!

Wait no that would be rascist...
 
...due to their indiscriminate distribution practices, African Americans and other minorities are experiencing a disproportionately higher number of deaths and injuries from gun violence...

Don't you just hate the way the big mean firearms industry forces people to buy guns against their will?
 
Might make for some interesting reading in the papers if some Klan chapter somewhere were to send a written endorsement of the NAACPs position to a bunch of newspapers, on Klan letterhead.


"No person of color shall appear in public armed, even with a club."
Virginia colony law ca 1640
 
NAACP should change its name to reflect what they are currently doing:

N egroes
A cting
A gainst (all)
C olored
P people
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top