USMC Mk 318 Mod 0 SOST 5.56mm

Status
Not open for further replies.
Shawn, got any data on performance? :confused:

Also, a bit off topic, but supposedly (SWAT magazine) a new .mil 9mm round being adopted? :eek:

:)
 
I read some time back, about 2 yrs ago, that a new 9mm round with some type of polymer ball underneath the nose of the jacket that will expand on impact but not break apart. Supposedly it was to mimic the effect of the 45 cal. True/False I don't know. This is the funny part. They had to add some type of barium to it so it would show up on x ray should some of the polymer break off and cause a possible clot in an artery or vain. Last I remember if I shot some one It was because I wanted them to die to begin with. The new age of friendlier ammo has come.
 
USMC Mk 318 Mod 0 SOST 5.56mm

Does that stuff shoot any different than the Mk 318 ammo developed for SOCOM? :rolleyes:

I read some time back, about 2 yrs ago, that a new 9mm round with some type of polymer ball underneath the nose of the jacket that will expand on impact but not break apart.

One of the major manufacturers was making stuff they termed Expanding Full Metal Jacket rounds that worked like that. Never actually handled or shot them, personally, by my recollection is that they got mixed reviews from the Gun Rags.
 
$1 a round for 5.56mm!!?? I'll stick with 500 round tin of Tula I just bought for $150.
 
I suppose they are the same manufacturer as silver bear but I have shot loads of the wolf polycoat 223 and never had any problems other then the smell. It's never wore out the extractor or eject like so many say it would. I did buy some of the HotShot from Century and that was crap. I had nothing but blown primers every other round im lucky it didn't break a firing pin.
 
Last edited:
What do you mean like "Silver Bear", it that good or bad?. I've never used the stuff.

It was a tongue in cheek remark about how you can get 62gr hollow point Silver Bear for about 1/5 the cost of this round.

Although I'm sure the mil spec stuff is loaded more evenly, a bit hotter, and burns cleaner.
 
This is the "latest and greatest" with a price to match. It's not plinking ammo. If you're worried about bad guys hiding behind doors or windshields, it might be worth 90 cents/round. Not so much for killing paper.
 
Hatterasguy writes:
It was a tongue in cheek remark about how you can get 62gr hollow point Silver Bear for about 1/5 the cost of this round.

Although I'm sure the mil spec stuff is loaded more evenly, a bit hotter, and burns cleaner.
Mk 318 Mod 0 was designed to reliably penetrate light hard barriers (laminated auto windshield glass and sheet metal) better than M855 62gr (green tip penetrator) and provide superior wound ballistics performance regardless of whether or not light barrier materials are encountered.

Laminated automotive windshield glass is a difficult light barrier for most 5.56mm bullets to penetrate. The best "barrier blind" bullets for general-purpose use are listed here: http://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=19881 (Most of these cartridges cost well over $1 each.)
 
SSA makes a nice 70gr round that I am told works very well on vehicles.

http://www.m4carbine.net/showpost.php?p=698023&postcount=155 :

As previously noted, with a non-fragmenting bullet design like the TSX, heavier bullet weights are not necessarily better, especially at closer ranges and from shorter barrels. As long as penetration and upset remain adequate, it is possible to use lighter weight non-fragmenting bullets and still have outstanding terminal performance. With fragmenting designs, a heavier bullet is ideal, as it provides more potential fragments and still allows the central core to have enough mass for adequate penetration.

The 55 gr TSX used in the Federal (T223S) load stabilizes in barrel twists from 1/12 through 1/7, unlike the 53 gr TSX which is a bit longer than the 55 gr TSX, due to a different ogive and does not stabilize as consistently in all 1/12 twist barrels. The 55 gr TSX offers a flat shooting, high velocity projectile that offers excellent soft tissue terminal performance and good penetration.

When TSX's when fired through auto windshields, the jacket "petals" collapse against the nose, fold back against the core, or the "petals" are torn off; this results in a caliber size projectile configured a lot like a full wadcutter, leading to deep penetration whether shooting light or heavy TSX projectiles:

Barnes 53 gr TSX BG/auto window & Barnes 70 gr TSX BG/auto window fired from 16" 1/7 barrel at 10 feet:
556TSXglass.jpg

As illustrated above, the lighter TSX's expand more in soft tissue and are no different when fired through auto glass than the heavier 70 gr TSX.

Thus for the vast majority of CONUS LE/personal defense use at typical ranges of under 100 yds, the 55 gr TSX offer the most versatility. For environments were longer range engagements beyond 300 meters may be necessary, the heavier 70 gr TSX is superior due to better BC and less wind drift (the 70 gr has a BC of .314, while the 55 gr has a .209 BC).

FWIW, I use the Barnes 62gr TAC-X bullet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top