Lovegasoline
Member
I've been studying (theory, not practice) the claims and effects of different technologies in shaping the pattern of shot. Now, I must preface further elaboration in this post by the fact that I am a baby when it comes to shotguns, not having shot very much, and that little is a good 20 years behind me. As I said, a baby.
I read claims touted by Vang Comp and followers of tightened patterns by masterful tuning of the forcing cone (plus the barrel jump tonic and recoil calming effects of porting). On the other hand, I read of tightened patterns effected by the use of a differently choked barrel and by replaceable and/or adjustable chokes.
The claims of the Vang Comp'ers are often couched in superlatives ... while OTOH a shotgunner using a choke system seems nonplussed with their choked patterns. So what exctly IS the difference between Vang Comp'ing and using a different Choke? Are they opposite sides of the same outcome arrived by different means? Does one system have shortcomings not found in the other or visa versa?
Furthermore....
Does the patterning of an interchangable choke system (ex., Accu Choke) suffer in any way over a fixed barrel of similiar choke? Are slugs less accurate passing through a replacable choke system than a fixed choke barrel? Is there any downside to using replacable chokes....maintanance, reliability, ability to eat all types of loads?
On to an application. In a HD & Social shotgun is there any benefit to the use of a choke other than cylinder bore (or the latter's equivalant in an Accu Choke type system) .... and....or...is there any benefit to the Vang Comp system over and above the two previous configurations, for similar applications?
The question isn't entirely theoretical. I'm about to buy a shotgun and among the contenders (all are variations of the same base model) are an Accu Choked version and also a Vang Comped (full barrel modifications & porting) version. Let price not be an issue....as the guns are perfectly arrayed to confound the ruminations of the wallet.
Thanks.
I read claims touted by Vang Comp and followers of tightened patterns by masterful tuning of the forcing cone (plus the barrel jump tonic and recoil calming effects of porting). On the other hand, I read of tightened patterns effected by the use of a differently choked barrel and by replaceable and/or adjustable chokes.
The claims of the Vang Comp'ers are often couched in superlatives ... while OTOH a shotgunner using a choke system seems nonplussed with their choked patterns. So what exctly IS the difference between Vang Comp'ing and using a different Choke? Are they opposite sides of the same outcome arrived by different means? Does one system have shortcomings not found in the other or visa versa?
Furthermore....
Does the patterning of an interchangable choke system (ex., Accu Choke) suffer in any way over a fixed barrel of similiar choke? Are slugs less accurate passing through a replacable choke system than a fixed choke barrel? Is there any downside to using replacable chokes....maintanance, reliability, ability to eat all types of loads?
On to an application. In a HD & Social shotgun is there any benefit to the use of a choke other than cylinder bore (or the latter's equivalant in an Accu Choke type system) .... and....or...is there any benefit to the Vang Comp system over and above the two previous configurations, for similar applications?
The question isn't entirely theoretical. I'm about to buy a shotgun and among the contenders (all are variations of the same base model) are an Accu Choked version and also a Vang Comped (full barrel modifications & porting) version. Let price not be an issue....as the guns are perfectly arrayed to confound the ruminations of the wallet.
Thanks.