Video - The Glock - America's Gun

Status
Not open for further replies.
And now for some more Perfection from the Glock marketing dept.

The reason the Glock popular is they undercut all the pricing in the law enforcement market 30 years ago.

America's guns are the 1911 and the Handejector, the Glock is made in Austria.
I see a lot of posters think that it is bad that "Glock" was cheaper than the competition in the early days and that was a bad thing. I also see a lot of posters that claim that "Glock" is way over priced since the manufacturing cost has been "guestimated" at less than $100 and that is a bad thing. So, they the price is both too cheap and too expensive at the same time for some people.
I also have noticed a lot of postings that seem to say that "Glock is made in Austria" and that is bad. I do not hardly see any postings claiming that the fact that XD is made in Coatia is a bad thing. Also there are lots of Glocks made out side of Austria, like Georgia.
My conclusion is that Glocks numerous enough that both the "lovers" and the "haters" go to great lengths to find something to complain about.
 
Anybody that claims that Glock is not America's gun needs to open his eyes. Look what your local police officers carry. More often then not it is a Glock 17 or Glock 22. Yes I realize that there are agencies that carry Sigs, M&Ps, Berettas and what have you, but Glock has the majority of the American law enforcement market, which let's face it, is the segment of the gun market that is most visible.

The 1911 has had it's run. It's a good pistol with timeless lines and feel that conjures up images of pure Americana, but it is not a serious contender for Glock's market shares. There is a reason that Kimber keeps beating that LAPD SWAT horse, they don't have many other LEO contracts to hang their hats on. The 1911 is a poor choice for a duty weapon when compared to modern options, including Glock. It's heavy, it's capacity is limited, it's expensive, it's more time consuming to maintain and often it's just not as reliable as more modern designs.

This translates to the civilian market. People buy what cops buy. Yes, there are exceptions, but I can't tell you how many Glock 22s we sell because people come in and ask, "Isn't this what cops use?" It's not great logic and it's the lazy way to make a decision, but it happens every day, often multiple times per day. Often times it doesn't even matter how the gun feels to the customer. They have heard the name Glock, or they've heard about the torture tests, or their cop buddy recommended Glock, so by George that's what they are getting. You can't even change their mind about the caliber.

I guess what I'm saying is if you look at things from a real world perspective, Glock is "modern" America's gun. It had everything that Americans look for. It's cheap, it's easy, it's available and it's good enough. It's McDonald's in a handgun, and though I'd never say McDonald's was my favorite burger there is a reason it is one of the most successful franchises in the world.
 
I see a lot of posters think that it is bad that "Glock" was cheaper than the competition in the early days and that was a bad thing. I also see a lot of posters that claim that "Glock" is way over priced since the manufacturing cost has been "guestimated" at less than $100 and that is a bad thing. So, they the price is both too cheap and too expensive at the same time for some people.
I also have noticed a lot of postings that seem to say that "Glock is made in Austria" and that is bad. I do not hardly see any postings claiming that the fact that XD is made in Coatia is a bad thing. Also there are lots of Glocks made out side of Austria, like Georgia.
My conclusion is that Glocks numerous enough that both the "lovers" and the "haters" go to great lengths to find something to complain about.

So .....
I guess Honda is America's motorcycle, because they are inexpensive, some are made in Ohio, and there are more of them sold than American marks.
 
I can't help but notice the irony of this conversation occurring on TheHighRoad.org. At the same time, last I checked there were no official criteria for the designation of "America's Handgun." Thus, anyone can accurately describe any handgun as America's Handgun. The OP and his supporters have some strong arguments on their side, as do his dissenters. "You're wrong. No, you're wrong!" arguments are as lame and futile as stating that one's father could beat up another's.

Nice vid, OP.
 
Given that the revolver was carried in America for the last 160 years, the revolver is undoubtably America's Gun. It was carried by American police for the last 140 years. Glock has quite a while before it gets to catch up to that. Considering Colt and Smith & Wesson dominated said market, them Smith & Wesson gets to claim, with a far greater lineage and pedigree, to be America's gun - more significant because S&W autos were also being used by police.

Go back 20 years, and Glock could not hope to make such a statement. That is akin to looking outside at 6:00 and deciding that, all of a sudden, America's weather is cooling and the light is going away.
 
The only guns that can be called Americas gun IMO are the models that have helped up win wars and keep our sovereignty..ala 1911's, M1 garands,M16s etc..crock's..er I mean glocks dont even come close.
 
This sounds like a board full of Alabama fans. Always living in the past. This is not the late 1800's. It's not the 1950's. Heck, it's not even the 1990's. Glock is more engrained into American culture than any other handgun in the present, and it's not even a close race. You will not find any firearm more instantly recognizable in American culture than a Glock pistol. I know it hurts some of your sentimental feelings, but it is the truth. The Smith and Wesson revolver and the 1911 have been replaced as the go-to gun in America.
 
Glock is more engrained into American culture than any other handgun in the present, and it's not even a close race. You will not find any firearm more instantly recognizable in American culture than a Glock pistol.
It's not really instantly recognizable, the word "Glock" is just used as a catch-all term for polymer handguns (or any gun really) by the media and people who don't know a whole lot about firearms. That doesn't make it iconic or ingrained in American culture, just a buzz word people use to give the impression of knowledge regarding firearms. If I were to set the criteria for determining "America's Gun" I'd say it'd have to be something that's instantly recognizable and unambiguously American.
 
I don't think the Beretta 92 (I am assuming that is the Beretta you are referring to.)is on the same level as Glock. The silhouette of a Glock 17 (ugly as it may be) is one that many Americans have seen in some form or fashion. The Beretta 92 may be in the top 5, but I don't think it has the name recognition or visual recognition of a Glock.

My experience is limited to my part of the country and military experience with guys from all over the world. The number one handgun customers request to look at in our store is Glock. That is with no prompting from us, no Glock advertising on or in the building. That is people walking in off the street and saying, "I want to buy a pistol. What Glocks do you carry?"

I'm not arguing whether Glock has the history of a 1911, Colt SAA or even a Beretta 92. It's not close. Those firearms have served Americans well for a long time and through several wars. I'm not saying Glock will have the longevity of either of those pistols, though for practical purposes and defensive purposes, the Colt SAA has gone the way of the dinosaurs. What I am saying is that right now, like it or not Glocks are the most popular and one of the most trusted pistols in the country. I realize there are parts of the country where Sigs are popular and parts where XDs are popular, but by and large the Glock generally outsells it's competition across several demographics.
 
Right now, Glocks are popular. But, the 1911 remains popular. Indeed, there are more manufacturers of it than polymer, striker-fired pistols. I've no problem with Glock, but that's like saying, as has been said, that the Accord is America's car (or was when it let in sales). Glock is no flash-in-the-pan, but it still cannot match other greats. Looking in the past? It is the body of usage that determines the king of the hill.

You probably thought the New Orleans Saints were America's football team.
 
Glock is more engrained into American culture than any other handgun in the present, and it's not even a close race.
If you think the average American can tell the difference between a Glock and Nighthawk. ( i hate to steal a lyric) you've got another thing coming.
 
I also see a lot of posters that claim that "Glock" is way over priced since the manufacturing cost has been "guestimated" at less than $100 and that is a bad thing. So, they the price is both too cheap and too expensive at the same time for some people.

78 bucks according to the author of the book.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top