(VT) Cop takes 'midnight photos' of teacher's classroom

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
Cop takes 'midnight photos' of teacher's classroom
May 5, 2003

By David Delcore

TIMES ARGUS STAFF

BARRE – John Mott and Tom Treece have at least one thing in common. Make that two.

Both men think they have been unfairly accused and, if you believe their critics, both have had a chilling impact on students at Spaulding High School.

Mott is the Barre Town police officer who admits he spent part of an early morning break last month photographing student projects in the classroom of a controversial history teacher.

Treece is that teacher. A passionate pacifist, he has been skewered publicly by critics who say he is pedaling his personal political views to the students in his class. Part of the proof, critics say, is in the photographs Mott took when he visited the high school April 9 while on duty, in uniform, and out of his jurisdiction.

The photographs were taken at around 1:30 a.m. after Mott, who once worked at Spaulding, persuaded a custodian to unlock the door to the classroom Treece shares with another teacher.

Mott isn’t apologizing for his actions and says he has at least temporarily refused orders from Barre Town Police Chief Michael Stevens and Town Manager Carl Rogers to supply school officials with copies of the photographs.

“I’m going to speak to an attorney first,†he said.

Mott disputes an account of the April 9 incident contained in a letter written by school Superintendent Dorothy Anderson to the police chief.

Specifically, Mott disputes Anderson’s claim that he “banged on the front door†of the high school to get the attention of night custodian Arnold Cliche, and that Cliche opened the door and let him in.

“It didn’t happen that way,†he said.

According to Mott, he entered the school through an unlocked maintenance door, found Cliche and asked him to unlock the door to Treece’s classroom room so he could take photographs with his personal camera. Although he was on duty at the time, Mott maintains that he was on a break and wanted to photograph student projects that offended him as an American and a retired military man.

“I wanted everybody else to see what was in that room. You can’t explain it,†he said.

Among the student projects that Mott said he photographed were a poster of the President Bush with duct tape over his mouth and a large papier-mâché combat boot with the American flag stuffed inside stepping on a doll. He said there also were pictures of Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and his former chief lieutenant, Ernesto “Che†Guevara, posted on the walls.

“Having spent 30 years in uniform, I was insulted,†he said. “… I’m just taking a stand on what happens in that classroom as a resident and a voter and a taxpayer of this community.â€

Mott said he took the photographs less than 48 hours after attending a school board meeting at which several residents complained about what they claimed was an attempt to “indoctrinate†not “educate†students.

School officials have rejected that notion, defending Treece as a “thought-provoking†teacher who provides students in his public issues class with resources from the full spectrum of political perspectives.

“As a teacher he (Treece) does present all sides of an issue,†Anderson said.

Anderson said she was concerned that Mott used his uniform to gain access to a locked classroom after hours without supervision.

“I find this behavior, at the very least, in violation of our policy for visitors at the school,†she wrote in her letter to the police chief. “I also find it disturbing that a police officer would wear his uniform under such circumstances thereby intimidating our employee (Cliche) into letting him in the building at a very unusual hour.â€

Anderson said she met with the police chief and the town manager on Friday to discuss her concerns and to reiterate her request for copies of the photographs Mott took and has been circulating in the community. She said Mott had not yet complied with that request, which is based solely on her desire to confirm the photographs were not doctored in any way.

“We’re not embarrassed about what was in that classroom,†she said. “We just want to make sure that the pictures he (Mott) took are an accurate reflection of what the classroom looked like.â€

Mott said the photographs he took are authentic and accused school officials of “tap-dancing†around an issue that was brought to their attention last month by using the circumstances under which he entered Treece’s classroom as a diversion.

“It leads me to believe they are out witch-hunting,†he said.

Treece said he knows the feeling. He says Mott and his other detractors don’t have a clue about what he does in his classroom, but that hasn’t stopped them from jumping to conclusions based on his personal political views.

“None of these parents know me in any way,†he said. “They just think they know me. Everything they know about me is hearsay. They don’t have kids in my class. They have taken lies and innuendoes and run with them.â€

Treece does not hide his personal views and acknowledges his public criticisms of the war in Iraq and President Bush have irked many in the community. However, he said their contention that he is force-feeding his views to Spaulding students is simply wrong.

“I tell kids from day one: ‘I don’t want you to agree with me, I want you to be informed and think for yourselves,†he said. “I have never squashed dissent in my class in any way shape or form.â€

Treece said his message to students is simple: “Defend what you believe and if you can’t defend it I’m going to pick holes in your argument no matter what side of the issue you’re on.â€

Treece said he supplies his students with a broad range of resources and encourages them to use them to come to their own conclusions.

“My goal in that class is to get kids to think and be critical of everything they read and hear and see,†he said.

Treece said he’s tired of being painted as anti-American simply because he challenges students not to take what anyone – not the president, their parents, or even he – says at face value.

“I want them to understand that everybody’s got an agenda … everybody,†he said.

Treece said that goes for his detractors, some of whom are using the controversy over a six-word sentence – “All hail the idiot boy king†– that he posted on a bulletin board next to a picture of President Bush as a reason to reject the high school budget. The budget is scheduled for a re-vote next week.

“They’re out to get the budget and they’ve made me their whipping boy,†he said.

Treece makes no apologies for how he conducts his classes or for his own political views. In retrospect, he said, the comment he posted about Bush was probably too direct.

The board meets at 7 p.m. in the high school library. Like the Malones, both Mott and Treece said they plan to attend.

“I did not recognize how fragile people’s feelings were at the time,†he said. “It was horrible timing on my part.â€

If he had it to do over again, Treece said he would spell out the same sentiments in two pages of text that wouldn’t have offended anyone.

Paul and Norma Malone, the local couple who first took issue with the comment Treece posted on the board, insist they’re not out to scuttle the budget, but want to restore balance in the curriculum at Spaulding.

“Our position has been and still is there should be a balance in that curriculum and respect in that school,†said Paul Malone.

Although the couple’s criticism is not limited to Treece, they admit his comment served as a springboard for their effort.

“It’s not an issue of freedom of speech. That was never the issue,†he said. “It’s an issue of balance and it’s an issue of professionalism.â€

Based on discussions with faculty, parents and students, Norma Malone said students from a largely conservative community are being urged to view the world to through a liberal lens.

“There’s nothing from the center or from the right,†she said, rejecting Treece’s comments to the contrary.

The Malones, who have formed the group “Citizens Advocating Responsible Education,†say they plan to attend tonight’s school board meeting and present a copy of a petition signed by several hundred supporters. The petition states in part: “Students must be provided a thorough, factual, unbiased study of the history of our nation, the importance of our government institutions, and the significance ofour political traditions so as to engender civic duty and respect for our national values.â€

In order to accomplish that goal, the petition suggests revisions to the school’s policy regarding academic freedom and the appointment of community members to the school board’s curriculum committee.

http://www.timesargus.com/Story/64950.html
 
Today, 5/6/03, Rush Limbaugh spoke at length on this. It now has gone nation wide and it will be interesting to see where it goes from here. PC run amok.
 
Interesting indeed. My prediction:

The officer is right, the projects would have provoked outrage. However, because he's a heavy-handed, blundering honyock, very few people will now work up much anger at the teacher. Most of it will be directed at the officer.

The teacher sounds like a paranoid, but I was once questioned pretty closely over some student projects, too. One of my students gave a talk on the Confederacy, while another gave a lecture on Nazi Germany (they were to give a public speech about any nation in history--we also had speeches on ancient Rome, Greece, Victorian England, the American West, etc.)

Anyway, the kid speaking on Germany checked out a book from the school library on Nazism. The librarian wasn't too sure about letting him have it, but I explained that it was for class. Then I was visited in the classroom. That would have gone better for me if the kid talking about the Confederacy hadn't been hanging the Stars 'n Bars on the board for his speech. It's amazing what some people find offensive.
 
As already said above...

I think the cop should have gone in civilian clothes as a citizen and not in uniform.


That said, I don't blame him and the others who are outraged for feeling that way. In many Arab and Muslim countries the schools teach hatred for infidels (us!) and for the West and indoctirnate the students to approve of and even to become terrorist murderers.

In the West and here in the US public schools are very often hotbeds of liberalism where they teach kids to have ("safe") sex, to worship nature, to hate Christianity and Capitalism and free enterprise and individualism, to glorify the poor, the homeless and other official victim groups who suffer our "oppression" -- in short the schools teach Marxism.

Discipline is outlawed, competition is demonized and the students are dumbed-down, but full of (unearned) self-esteem. And they rank near the bottom compared to the students of other countries.

Talk to teen-agers and young twenties and see how much they don't know. And how much they do "know" that is destructive and baloney. We are complicit in destroying our own young. This is one of our greatest contemporary American tragedies.

And the libertarians are correct: it is IMPOSSIBLE to reform the public (read government) schools. It is impossible to force families of widely differing outlooks and values into a one-size-fits-all school system without wasting much of the intelligence of the students. Government schools can only get worse because socialism can only spiral downward. You cannot reform a system of forced "education". Only freedom of choice can possibly work.

I don't know if it can ever happen in this country, given the power of the teachers unions and all the other left-liberal groups, media and so on -- but the government school system must be abolished. Private and religious parochial schools do a much better job of educating for half and less of the cost that the government schools do. Let the parents keep their school taxes and spend their money on the private schools of their choice.

Parents must be free to send their children to the schools of their choice, whether Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Wiccan, atheist -- or to educate their children themselves.

The latter is the choice made by my ex-wife and myself. Having a horror of what the schools have become, we decided to teach our daughter ourselves, starting in the fourth grade. She is now finishing grade nine and doing very well. And she has absorbed OUR values -- instead of those of the left-liberal "educators".

Although the police serve an important function and we cannot do without them -- most 2nd amendment types know to rely on themselves for self-defence and not on government bodies.

But for educating their precious children most think it a good idea to turn them over to strangers in day care and then in government schools. Is it not important to defend our kids against ALL dangers and not just against violence? Violence against our kids is a POSSIBILITY that we as responsible parents must defend them against.

But the damage that government schools do to your kids is a SURE THING.




Now go ahead and flame me.



Matis
 
Vermont Cop Story: AP's Bias or America's?

May 6, 2003


I spent Tuesday's Hour One discussing this story about Vermont police officer John Mott. While off duty at 1:30 AM, Mott entered a high school through an open service door. He then asked a janitor to unlock a classroom so he could take pictures of displays by "passionate pacifist" teacher Tom Treece to present to an attorney.

The Associated Press headlines this story: "Vt. Cop Photographed Class Projects," pointing a finger at the cop as the villain. We had to go to a local paper, the Barre Montpelier Times Argus, to find the classroom details. But this is not a media bias story. I held off giving my opinion on these events just to see what my audience's reaction would be, as you'll see below. More:

The officer reports taking pictures of "a poster of President Bush with duct tape over his mouth and a large papier-mâché combat boot with the American flag stuffed inside stepping on a doll, along with pictures of Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and his co-thug reactionary Ernesto “Che†Guevara. They aren't "pacifists"! Besides, the whole so-called peace movement was organized around defending and protecting Saddam Hussein! The slogan: "All hail the idiot boy king" was posted next to a picture of President Bush as, Treece claimed, "a reason to reject the high school budget."

If Mr. Treece posted pictures of me and Ronald Reagan on the wall, this cop would be a hero and the teacher would be on his way out. Apparently there were "rumors" about this teacher's curriculum, so this officer investigated. It's reported that there's a "backlash" against Officer Mott, but not that there was any sort of backlash against the class content. Why does it take a cop, taking pictures at 1:30 AM on his own time, to find out what's going on in this class? Where are the parents?

Is this not a public school? Our legal division doesn't see any constitutional issue on the officer entering the classroom in his private or public capacity; there's no expectation of privacy in a public school. We had a police officer call us up and say that Mott was off duty and out of his jurisdiction, so he shouldn't have entered the school or asked to be let into the locked classroom. You can hear such calls below along with my lengthily reporting of the details. I dedicated more than an hour to this story, and here's why:

After 70 minutes of discussion, all my e-mails and calls similarly focused on the cop - just like AP did. "So what, Rush?" So we hear education this and education that all the time in this country. Everybody claims to care about teaching "the children." But if we really cared about education, 90% of the garbage going on inside classrooms wouldn't be permitted. We would have parents involved in their children's education that know every word on the chalkboard and in the books. A police officer - who from this story doesn't seem to have any kids in the school much less in Treece's class - wouldn't have to enter through a service door and then ask a janitor to unlock the classroom for him. The parents would have expressed their outrage; instead, there wasn't a peep.

web_photos_3.Par.0003.ImageFile.jpg


http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_050603/content/truth_detector.guest.html

eib_extra.Par.0007.ImageFile.jpg
 
A passionate pacifist, he has been skewered publicly by critics who say he is pedaling his personal political views to the students in his class.
he was doing this from a bicycle in his classroom, weaving about between the student's desks? Isn't this a bit dangerous? What if he ran over one of them?:D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top