Warning on lead fallout at gun clubs

Status
Not open for further replies.

ZeSpectre

Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
5,502
Location
Deep in the valley
Warning on lead fallout at gun clubs

(09-28) 18:49 PDT -- For 40 years on clear mornings, avid shooters have turned out at the Petaluma Trap and Skeet Club for the sport of popping away at clay pigeons hurled into the air.

The western Sonoma County range looks idyllic with hawks and golden eagles diving over grazing sheep. But in a year's time, the rural outdoor range is strewn with seven tons of lead, according to the U.S. Coast Guard, which owns the land.

Health officials worry about even trace amounts of lead in gasoline, paint, plumbing, food and consumer products, which is why conservationists and regulators are warning about letting thousands of tons of lead accumulate at shooting ranges statewide.

Despite some cleanups and spotty county inspections, dozens of ranges in California remain under the radar of regulation.

Lead litter endangers wildlife and waterways, scientists say. Lead is so toxic that if consumed, it stunts the growth of animals and plants, and causes the loss of biological diversity, according to scientists at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Runoff from ranges can be rich in lead, said Tom Mumley, assistant executive officer of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, which halted the use of lead shot at shooting ranges near water in the mid-1990s.

"We think there are solutions that don't require lead shot."

But gun clubs, like the Petaluma Trap and Skeet Club, disagree.

"Lead's not a contaminant. It doesn't run with the water," said Jerry Cossey, club president of the Petaluma club who has been a member for all of its 40 years.

But costly cleanups show otherwise.

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission water customers paid $25 million to clean up the now-closed Peninsula Gun Club near San Francisco Bay in Menlo Park. At Lake Merced, the city told the Pacific Rod and Gun Club to begin a lead study at the club's expense.

"There could well be more than 1,000 tons of lead remaining at the lake from skeet shooting over the years," said Tony Winnicker, commission spokesman. "That, of course, is a serious concern."
Wildlife at risk

Environmentalists and hunters are still at odds after a state law passed last year banned lead bullets in 14 counties. The law is intended to protect California condors from poisoning because the birds' food, dead birds and mammals, becomes contaminated when the animals consume lead ammunition or are shot with lead.

The condor preservation fight highlighted the issue of lead exposure and its effect on the environment, according to a recent report by the American Ornithological Society for Audubon California. Lead shot has also been banned for use at national wildlife refuges and some state parks. And the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service told duck and geese hunters to stop using lead ammunition by 1991 as a way of protecting wetlands and water.

"There's no good reason to be putting lead in the environment ... it's clear it's toxic," said Graham Chisholm, Audubon California's conservation director.

Diane Hichwa, conservation chair of the local Madrone Audubon Society, agreed. "Lead as an environmental contaminant could be quite detrimental in the area west of Petaluma, which is a wintering area for raptors as they move along the Pacific Flyway."

The Petaluma shooting range, scattered with spent shot and broken clay, could attract golden eagles, hawks, peregrine falcons, American kestrels and merlins, said Melissa Pitkin, education director of PRBO Conservation Science.

Betty Burridge, famed editor of "Sonoma County Breeding Bird Atlas," singled out birds that would "eat off the ground" - California quails, mourning doves, rock pigeons and wild turkeys. Barn owls, which nest in the area, eat rats and mice that could pick up lead from the ground.
Coast Guard monitoring

Most ranges aren't required to report the release of lead. The amount of lead left behind by the Petaluma Trap and Skeet Club - which can serve as an indicator for other ranges - came to light only because the Coast Guard must submit an annual report to the EPA.

For the first time in 2006 and 2007, the Coast Guard reported that 300,000 shots fired at the club resulted in an annual 14,000 pounds of lead.

Patrick Nelligan, environmental protection specialist at the Coast Guard Training Center at Petaluma, said the Coast Guard adheres to the EPA's "best management" practices on outdoor shooting ranges, which outline how lead should be recovered, recycled and kept from moving outside of the range.

Nelligan said the club pays for a lead cleanup at least every five years. The top 2 inches of soil are removed and the shot is separated on the 1,000-foot by 225-foot fall zone. The grass seed planted by the club and alfalfa grown by Sonoma County farmers help to inhibit lead runoff from the range, he said.

The club is required to hire a company to test the soil every other year.

The most recent soil monitoring reported the highest lead concentration of 17,000 parts per million and the average of nine samples taken in the fall zone at 2,165 ppm, said Nelligan, who reviews the results. The lead isn't considered hazardous waste by the EPA because it's on a shooting range - and eventually will be recycled. If it were a hazardous waste site, the ratio would have to be cleaned up to 1,000 ppm.

The sampling of soil is limited to the shooting range, Nelligan said. The Coast Guard assumes that the topography and vegetation limit migration offsite of lead, he said.
Resistance to change

Shooters bristle at the idea that their sport is harmful to the environment and resist changing the shot they use.

There appear to be 80 gun clubs in California, according to Clay Targets Online. Lead is the cheapest, most popular shot. If the lead peppered on the range west of Petaluma is any indication of what small outdoor ranges accumulate in a year, lead litter statewide could reach 500 tons a year.

Representatives of the Pacific International Trapshooting Association and the California State Trapshooting Association refused to respond to queries about membership and any movement toward replacing lead shot.

Skeet aficionados prefer lead shot, saying non-toxic substitutes cost much more. Steel, one alternative, can damage older guns, takes more powder to shoot and is not as effective, they say.

Jeff Miller, conservation advocate for the Center for Biological Diversity, said there are at least 10 approved nontoxic types of shot other than lead and steel and some were designed to approximate the density and weight of lead.

"As regulations and interest in using non-lead shot increase, the price is going to come down," Miller said. "Lead's been a useful metal. But from what we know... there's no reason to keep using it."

E-mail Jane Kay at [email protected].
 
Cleanup Costs

But costly cleanups show otherwise.


FYI: we hired a firm to come in and cleanup our shot-fall areas. We made money; they made money.
 
I live in the lead ban hunting area & since the ban went into effect I have not been out to feed the local condors or game wardens. Figured they both will starve to death. End of problem!!!!!!! Also, I spend my shooting money in a much more gun friendly state!!!!!! Soon as I retire BYE BYE ARNIE!!!!
 
"There's no good reason to be putting lead in the environment ... it's clear it's toxic," said Graham Chisholm, Audubon California's conservation director.

Where the heck do they think the lead comes from in the first place?

:confused:
 
Whats wrong with steel shot? I use steel shot + Ballistic tips when I hunt. I don't use lead, except in my CCW weapon.

I don't see the issue with why people have to use lead.
 
It's not about the lead. It never has been and it never will be.

It's about shooting - guns, to be precise. The EPA is more concerned with the health of the California Condor than it is with Constitutionally guaranteed rights. They shouldn't have the authority to infringe one to protect the other... but apparently, they do anyways.
 
So much lead is left in the environment after they used it for gasoline that it's insane, yet they're worried about lead shot from shotguns?

Come on people. Lead isn't 1/10th as harmful as they make it out to be. It's used in everything. Why don't they go after lead weights for fishing? Like someone said, it's not about the lead, it's about the guns.
 
They did ban lead fishing weight in Ca. They are looking at doing it in several other states.
 
Yeah, that's why they still allow it in paint and household water pipes! Oh, wait...

You don't eat lead shot or cover your house in it. I read something along the lines of the lead levels in the environment went up hundreds of times ever since they started using lead in gasoline. Since they stopped, the numbers aren't rising, but the lead is still there.

The increase in environmental lead levels due to lead shot is insignificant and there are greater environmental problems that we can be spending our money on.
 
lead retains more terminal energy.
lead: 11.36 g/cm^3
Steel: 7.86 g/cm^3

That's why lead is a good projectile material.
It is that simple.
It is also cheap and LEGAL. Most other affordable materials have been banned for most solid projectiles (like handgun bullets) as illegal armor piercing projectiles.
So if lead is banned, not only is ammo generaly less effective but it will cost several times as much. There is a whole lot more lead in the world than things like bismuth.
If the demand for things like bismuth increased dramaticly to supply the entire ammo industry then its value would also skyrocket, pricing shooting out of most people's budgets.
It already costs several times what lead does, vhastly increased demand would put it even higher.
Using other cheap materials like steel/iron (with a coating to protect the rifling) is illegal federaly for pistols.
Further, a great irony is that most bismuth is actualy produced as a byproduct of lead mining.


So lead is not only has some of the best properties as a projectile, it is cheap and abundant.
Once lead is banned even for range use the cost of the sport will be very high.
That means far fewer people will do casual plinking and a severe blow to the RKBA will have been dealt, and one of the biggest sources for RKBA support may be reduced.
 
lead

the NRA had research on lead and it showed the rang lead did not travel into ground water or any where the corrosion on lead prevents the lead from disindergrating(?)look at the civil war battle field pick ups.they should be gone according to the ideas of the enviormentilists.go to some one that knows.I have read the NRA reports and believe them.:uhoh::rolleyes:
 
Shooters bristle at the idea that their sport is harmful to the environment and resist changing the shot they use.

The writer didn't present any evidence of this statement??

This article was very clearly biased against one thing.......guns.

If it wasn't then they would have talked about all of the lead sinkers that have been left behind in waterways by fishermen..... I've yet to see a lake of fish start dying off because of all the lead sinkers.
 
I live in the lead ban hunting area & since the ban went into effect I have not been out to feed the local condors or game wardens. Figured they both will starve to death. End of problem!!!!!!! Also, I spend my shooting money in a much more gun friendly state!!!!!! Soon as I retire BYE BYE ARNIE!!!!

They want to try that here. Haven't seen any condors latley. But Arizona copies what Kali-fornia law makers pass. No matter how stupid it is.

Maybe shooting them with FMJ's might help. No lead Poisoning then:rolleyes:

I meant the condors:neener: My friend uses old wheel weights for his lead bullets. Isn't recycling environmentally friendly?:D
 
Using other cheap materials like steel/iron (with a coating to protect the rifling) is illegal federaly for pistols.

IIRC, that only applies if the bullet is made of 100% banned materials (i.e. 100% steel or 60% steel, 40% tungsten; etc.)
Therefore I believe you could have a steel core jacketed in copper.
 
The most recent soil monitoring reported the highest lead concentration of 17,000 parts per million and the average of nine samples taken in the fall zone at 2,165 ppm, said Nelligan, who reviews the results. The lead isn't considered hazardous waste by the EPA because it's on a shooting range - and eventually will be recycled. If it were a hazardous waste site, the ratio would have to be cleaned up to 1,000 ppm.

Ooops, they let a fact slip by the censors. Yes ranges collect up the lead and sell it to recyclers or they get someone to do it for them. Guess they have not checked the price of lead lately. If they are paying someone $23,000,000 to cleanup a shooting range that sure raises a lot of questions about either their sanity or level of corruption.
 
what about lead in car batteries?

Super efficient recycle. Your car battery is recycled and back on the shelf in a few months. Strange we pay disposal fees for items that are already profitable to recycle like batteries and tires.
 
I read something along the lines of the lead levels in the environment went up hundreds of times ever since they started using lead in gasoline. Since they stopped, the numbers aren't rising, but the lead is still there.

Technically, the levels of lead in the environment have never changed, like the amount of water on earth has never changed (ok, a couple gallons may have been peed into space). The lead was always there, it will always be there. It's never been a problem before. Animals surely live around lead mines.

Maybe shooting them with FMJ's might help. No lead Poisoning then

I meant the condors

Nah, not enough meat left after a FMJ hit. Eggs are still tasty :neener:

That does bring up another point. If lead is sooooo dangerous, then how is it safe for people to eat the animals they hunt after injecting them with hot lead? Stupid environazis.
 
I'm amazed at the lack of environmental knowledge displayed here. "The Lead was always here?" Where are you guys coming from? That's one of the most ridiculous statements I've ever heard. It's all about concentrations, biological availability, and where exactly the material is located. Sure if tons of lead are in an old salt mine, no problem, but leaching into your water or food (if it actually does) then that's a problem. There's always been water on the planet, but if you have 5-lbs of it in your lungs, you got a problem! Now tell the drowned guy he should be alive since there's ALWAYS been the same amount of water in the lake. RIIGHT.
 
True, but irrelevant. This is mostly about back-door gun regulation, by forcing people to use nonexistent solutions to largely nonexistent problems.

The argument for steel shot for hunting waterfowl is defensible - the argument is that shot is ingested by the birds. But as other posters have pointed out, bullets from Civil War battlefields are routinely recovered intact. IIRC, there was a recent study done by Virginia Tech which pretty well disproved the whole lead migration issue.
 
It's not about condors.

It's not about fish.

It has nothing to do with common sense.




It's a back door gun grab/money grab pure and simple.

There are probably TONS of lead sinkers etc out near the ends of the North and South Galveston Jetties (I know we've lost plenty over the years!) and fish out of those waters hasn't killed us yet...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top