SWATcashJeremy
Member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 53
Washington's state constitution reads thusly
"The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain, or employ an armed body of men."
Wash. Const. Art. I, Sect. 24
Bearing arms means act of possessing on ones body does it not?
Requiring a permit to carry would be impairing that right would it not?
I guess that means the claims that you can be arrested for brandishing a firearm by carrying in a holster are null and void too.
comments?
thoughts?
flames?
"The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain, or employ an armed body of men."
Wash. Const. Art. I, Sect. 24
Bearing arms means act of possessing on ones body does it not?
Requiring a permit to carry would be impairing that right would it not?
I guess that means the claims that you can be arrested for brandishing a firearm by carrying in a holster are null and void too.
comments?
thoughts?
flames?