WonderNine
member
....because terrorists want to disrupt the democratic process.
http://www.markfiore.com/animation/fear.html
http://www.markfiore.com/animation/fear.html
We may have to disrupt the democratic process....
But the BS the admin is shoveling on that point comes out of both sides of their mouths. Want proof?No it's the terrorists that may attempt to disrupt the democratic process.
Ummm...dude, you have to do better thinking and "due diligence" than THAT on THIS forum!But the BS the admin is shoveling on that point comes out of both sides of their mouths. Want proof?
1) They claim Kerry is Bin laden's pick for the next president because terrorists are afraid of Bush.
2) They claim Bin laden wants to "disrupt the democratic process."
What's wrong eith this "reasoning"? IT'S CONTRADICTORY.
BH, so you're saying if NOTHING disrupts the election , Kerry'll win anyway? Care to make a gentlemen's wager on that?
Uh -huh..... I don't think you want to bait me on sources. The last time somebody hacked me off bad enough that I had to do research on a point I was being called on, I posted 40 cites along with the text and shut their server down.Cite your source material, please? If you're going to quote "they", please give us a link or at least a source and date
I am unclear if it is EVERYONE who disagrees with your ridiculous assertions who is a fool, or just me, or....?So far, I have been gracious enough to let those fools slide without any "I told you so", but it's awfully tempting when the same people are baiting me on "accuracy".
They are constantly posting the fake photo of Bin laden holding a "Kerry for President" sign and then saying that Al qaeda will try to stop the election. As I said... pick the side of the cow you like, and show it. Can't have it both ways.
How is that contradictory? If the bin Laden gang can be seen, whether it is the truth or not, to influence the election in any way, they can claim a victory as they did in Spain.But the BS the admin is shoveling on that point comes out of both sides of their mouths. Want proof?
1) They claim Kerry is Bin laden's pick for the next president because terrorists are afraid of Bush.
2) They claim Bin laden wants to "disrupt the democratic process."
What's wrong eith this "reasoning"? IT'S CONTRADICTORY.
That website is full of mindless piffle.
But the BS the admin is shoveling on that point comes out of both sides of their mouths. Want proof?
1) They claim Kerry is Bin laden's pick for the next president because terrorists are afraid of Bush.
2) They claim Bin laden wants to "disrupt the democratic process."
What's wrong eith this "reasoning"? IT'S CONTRADICTORY.
Uh -huh..... I don't think you want to bait me on sources. The last time somebody hacked me off bad enough that I had to do research on a point I was being called on, I posted 40 cites along with the text and shut their server down.
What I said is I get a kick out of listening to the repubs talk out of both sides of their mouths. They are constantly posting the fake photo of Bin laden holding a "Kerry for President" sign and then saying that Al qaeda will try to stop the election. As I said... pick the side of the cow you like, and show it. Can't have it both ways.