weapons in Iraq

Status
Not open for further replies.

bill2

Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
289
Location
bay area California
This is from Clayton Cramer's web site. It's a good article on guns being used in Iraq and what the troops think of them.
____________________________________________
Hello to all my fellow gunners, military buffs, veterans and interested guys. A couple of weekends ago I got to spend time with my son Jordan, who was on his first leave since returning from Iraq. He is well (a little thin), and already bored. He will be returning to Iraq for a second tour in early '06 and has already re-enlisted early for 4 more years. He loves the Marine Corps and is actually looking forward to returning to Iraq.

Jordan spent 7 months at "Camp Blue Diamond" in Ramadi. Aka: Fort Apache. He saw and did a lot and the following is what he told me about weapons, equipment, tactics and other miscellaneous info which may be of interest to you. Nothing is by any means classified. No politics here, just a Marine with a bird's eye view's opinions:

1) The M-16 rifle : Thumbs down. Chronic jamming problems with the talcum powder like sand over there. The sand is everywhere. Jordan says you feel filthy 2 minutes after coming out of the shower. The M-4 carbine version is more popular because it's lighter and shorter, but it has jamming problems also. They like the ability to mount the various optical gunsights and weapons lights on the picattiny rails, but the weapon itself is not great in a desert environment. They all hate the 5.56mm (.223) round. Poor penetration on the cinderblock structure common over there and even torso hits can't be reliably counted on to put the enemy down. Fun fact: Random autopsies on dead insurgents shows a high level of opiate use.

2) The M243 SAW (squad assault weapon): .223 cal. Drum fed light machine gun. Big thumbs down. Universally considered a piece of []. Chronic jamming problems, most of which require partial disassembly. (that's fun in the middle of a firefight).

3) The M9 Beretta 9mm: Mixed bag. Good gun, performs well in desert environment; but they all hate the 9mm cartridge. The use of handguns for self-defense is actually fairly common. Same old story on the 9mm: Bad guys hit multiple times and still in the fight.

4) Mossberg 12ga. Military shotgun: Works well, used frequently for clearing houses to good effect.

5) The M240 Machine Gun: 7.62 Nato (.308) cal. belt fed machine gun, developed to replace the old M-60 (what a beautiful weapon that was!!). Thumbs up. Accurate, reliable, and the 7.62 round puts 'em down. Originally developed as a vehicle mounted weapon, more and more are being dismounted and taken into the field by infantry. The 7.62 round chews up the structure over there.

6) The M2 .50 cal heavy machine gun: Thumbs way, way up. "Ma deuce" is still worth her considerable weight in gold. The ultimate fight stopper, puts their [] in the dirt every time. The most coveted weapon in-theater.

7) The .45 pistol: Thumbs up. Still the best pistol round out there. Everybody authorized to carry a sidearm is trying to get their hands on one. With few exceptions, can reliably be expected to put 'em down with a torso hit. The special ops guys (who are doing most of the pistol work) use the HK military model and supposedly love it. The old government model .45's are being re-issued en masse.

8) The M-14: Thumbs up. They are being re-issued in bulk, mostly in a modified version to special ops guys. Modifications include lightweight Kevlar stocks and low power red dot or ACOG sights. Very reliable in the sandy environment, and they love the 7.62 round.

9) The Barrett .50 cal sniper rifle: Thumbs way up. Spectacular range and accuracy and hits like a freight train. Used frequently to take out vehicle suicide bombers ( we actually stop a lot of them) and barricaded enemy. Definitely here to stay.

10) The M24 sniper rifle: Thumbs up. Mostly in .308 but some in .300 Win Mag. Heavily modified Remington 700's. Great performance. Snipers have been used heavily to great effect. Rumor has it that a Marine sniper on his third tour in Anbar province has actually exceeded Carlos Hathcock's record for confirmed kills with OVER 100.

11) The new body armor: Thumbs up. Relatively light at approx. 6 lbs. and can reliably be expected to soak up small shrapnel and even will stop an AK-47 round. The bad news: Hot as [] to wear, almost unbearable in the summer heat (which averages over 120 degrees). Also, the enemy now goes for head shots whenever possible. All the [] about the "old" body armor making our guys vulnerable to the IEDs was a non-starter. The IED explosions are enormous and body armor doesn't make any difference at all in most cases.

12) Night Vision and Infrared Equipment: Thumbs way up. Spectacular performance. Our guys see in the dark and own the night, period. Very little enemy action after evening prayers. More and more enemy being whacked at night during movement by our hunter-killer teams. We've all seen the videos.

13) Lights: Thumbs up. Most of the weapon mounted and personal lights are Surefires, and the troops love 'em. Invaluable for night urban operations. Jordan carried a $34 Surefire G2 on a neck lanyard and loved it.

I can't help but notice that most of the good fighting weapons and ordnance are 50 or more years old!!!!!!!!! With all our technology, it's the WWII and Vietnam era weapons that everybody wants!!!! The infantry fighting is frequent, up close and brutal. No quarter is given or shown.

Bad guy weapons:

1) Mostly AK47's The entire country is an arsenal. Works better in the desert than the M16 and the .308 Russian round kills reliably. PKM belt fed light machine guns are also common and effective. Luckily, the enemy mostly shoots like []. Undisciplined "spray and pray" type fire. However, they are seeing more and more precision weapons, especially sniper rifles. (Iran, again) Fun fact: Captured enemy have apparently marveled at the marksmanship of our guys and how hard they fight. They are apparently told in Jihad school that the Americans rely solely on technology, and can be easily beaten in close quarters combat for their lack of toughness. Let's just say they know better now.

2) The RPG: Probably the infantry weapon most feared by our guys. Simple, reliable and as common as []. The enemy responded to our up-armored humvees by aiming at the windshields, often at point blank range. Still killing a lot of our guys.

3) The IED: The biggest killer of all. Can be anything from old Soviet anti-armor mines to jury rigged artillery shells. A lot found in Jordan's area were in abandoned cars. The enemy would take 2 or 3 155mm artillery shells and wire them together. Most were detonated by cell phone, and the explosions are enormous. You're not safe in any vehicle, even an M1 tank. Driving is by far the most dangerous thing our guys do over there. Lately, they are much more sophisticated "shape charges" (Iranian) specifically designed to penetrate armor. Fact: Most of the ready made IED's are supplied by Iran, who is also providing terrorists (Hezbollah types) to train the insurgents in their use and tactics. That's why the attacks have been so deadly lately. Their concealment methods are ingenious, the latest being shape charges in Styrofoam containers spray painted to look like the cinderblocks that litter all Iraqi roads. We find about 40% before they detonate, and the bomb disposal guys are unsung heroes of this war.

4) Mortars and rockets: Very prevalent. The Soviet era 122mm rockets (with an 18km range) are becoming more prevalent. One of Jordan's NCOs lost a leg to one. These weapons cause a lot of damage "inside the wire". Jordan's base was hit almost daily his entire time there by mortar and rocket fire, often at night to disrupt sleep patterns and cause fatigue (It did). More of a psychological weapon than anything else. The enemy mortar teams would jump out of vehicles, fire a few rounds, and then haul ass in a matter of seconds.

5) Bad guy technology: Simple yet effective. Most communication is by cell and satellite phones, and also by email on laptops. They use handheld GPS units for navigation and "Google earth" for overhead views of our positions. Their weapons are good, if not fancy, and prevalent. Their explosives and bomb technology is TOP OF THE LINE. Night vision is rare. They are very careless with their equipment and the captured GPS units and laptops are treasure troves of Intel when captured.

Who are the bad guys?:

Most of the carnage is caused by the Zarqawi Al Qaeda group. They operate mostly in Anbar province (Fallujah and Ramadi). These are mostly "foreigners", non-Iraqi Sunni Arab Jihadists from all over the Muslim world (and Europe). Most enter Iraq through Syria (with, of course, the knowledge and complicity of the Syrian govt.) , and then travel down the "rat line" which is the trail of towns along the Euphrates River that we've been hitting hard for the last few months. Some are virtually untrained young Jihadists that often end up as suicide bombers or in "sacrifice squads". Most, however, are hard core terrorists from all the usual suspects (Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas etc.) These are the guys running around murdering civilians en masse and cutting heads off. The Chechens (many of whom are Caucasian), are supposedly the most ruthless and the best fighters. (they have been fighting the Russians for years). In the Baghdad area and south, most of the insurgents are Iranian inspired (and led) Iraqi Shiites. The Iranian Shiia have been very adept at infiltrating the Iraqi local govt.'s, the police forces and the Army. The have had a massive spy and agitator network there since the Iran-Iraq war in the early 80's. Most of the Saddam loyalists were killed, captured or gave up long ago.

Bad Guy Tactics:

When they are engaged on an infantry level they get their asses kicked every time. Brave, but stupid. Suicidal Banzai-type charges were very common earlier in the war and still occur. They will literally sacrifice 8-10 man teams in suicide squads by sending them screaming and firing AKs and RPGs directly at our bases just to probe the defenses. They get mowed down like grass every time. (See the M2 and M240 above). Jordan's base was hit like this often. When engaged, they have a tendency to flee to the same building, probably for what they think will be a glorious last stand. Instead, we call in air and that's the end of that more often than not. These hole-ups are referred to as Alpha Whiskey Romeo's (Allah's Waiting Room). We have the laser guided ground-air thing down to a science. The fast movers, mostly Marine F-18s, are taking an ever increasing toll on the enemy. When caught out in the open, the helicopter gunships and AC-130 Spectre gunships cut them to ribbons with cannon and rocket fire, especially at night. Interestingly, artillery is hardly used at all. Fun fact: The enemy death toll is supposedly between 45-50 thousand. That is why we're seeing less and less infantry attacks and more IED, suicide bomber [].
The new strategy is simple: attrition.

The insurgent tactic most frustrating is their use of civilian non-combatants as cover. They know we do all we can to avoid civilian casualties and therefore schools, hospitals and (especially) mosques are locations where they meet, stage for attacks, cache weapons and ammo and flee to when engaged. They have absolutely no regard whatsoever for civilian casualties. They will terrorize locals and murder without hesitation anyone believed to be sympathetic to the Americans or the new Iraqi govt. Kidnapping of family members (especially children) is common to influence people they are trying to influence but cant reach, such as local govt. officials, clerics, tribal leaders, etc.).

The first thing our guys are told is "don't get captured". They know that if captured they will be tortured and beheaded on the internet. Zarqawi openly offers bounties for anyone who brings him a live American serviceman. This motivates the criminal element who otherwise don't give a [] about the war. A lot of the beheading victims were actually kidnapped by common criminals and sold to Zarqawi. As such, for our guys, every fight is to the death. Surrender is not an option.

The Iraqis are a mixed bag. Some fight well, others aren't worth a []. Most do okay with American support. Finding leaders is hard, but they are getting better. It is widely viewed that Zarqawi's use of suicide bombers, en masse, against the civilian population was a serious tactical mistake. Many Iraqis were galvanized and the caliber of recruits in the Army and the police forces went up, along with their motivation. It also led to an exponential increase in good intel because the Iraqis are sick of the insurgent attacks against civilians. The Kurds are solidly pro-American and fearless fighters.

According to Jordan, morale among our guys is very high. They not only believe they are winning, but that they are winning decisively. They are stunned and dismayed by what they see in the American press, whom they almost universally view as against them. The embedded reporters are despised and distrusted. They are inflicting casualties at a rate of 20-1 and then see [] like "Are we losing in Iraq" on TV and the print media. For the most part, they are satisfied with their equipment, food and leadership. Bottom line though, and they all say this, there are not enough guys there to drive the final stake through the heart of the insurgency, primarily because there aren't enough troops in-theater to shut down the borders with Iran and Syria. The Iranians and the Syrians just cant stand the thought of Iraq being an American ally (with, of course, permanent US bases there).
 
a few errors in this guy's post:

The M243 SAW (squad assault weapon): .223 cal. Drum fed light machine gun

Correction: M249SAW (Squad Automatic Weapon) belt fed not drum fed.

Mostly AK47's The entire country is an arsenal. Works better in the desert than the M16 and the .308 Russian round kills reliably.

Correction: AK-47's shoot a 7.62 x 39 round, commonly known as 7.62 Chinese. 7.62 Russian is 7.62 x 54. There is no ".308 Russian."
 
Most of the weapon complaints I have read about from Iraq, has more to do with old, worn out equipment that is poorly maintained than poorly designed equipment. Many of the units that are now in Iraq are NG, Reserve forces which, in most cases, recieve the old left overs from the regular Army/Marines. For instance, many 249 SAWs are now pushing 20 years in regular service. Even though during servicing the armourers replace many parts the receivers are still original, and probably pretty worn out. Weapons can only last so long even with regular maintaince. The military is in very sorry shape if soliders to have to make do, with the worn out equipment that they depend on for their lives.
 
Spreadfire Arms said:
a few errors in this guy's post:



Correction: M249SAW (Squad Automatic Weapon) belt fed not drum fed.

Though his Numeric designation and acronym decryption were flawed, I can see where someone would confuse the belt-containing detachable box with a drum magazine.


Correction: AK-47's shoot a 7.62 x 39 round, commonly known as 7.62 Chinese. 7.62 Russian is 7.62 x 54. There is no ".308 Russian."


Probably meant to say .30 cal Russian round and errantly tried to sound smarter than his audience. This one is somewhat excusable.

original article said:
They all hate the 5.56mm (.223) round. Poor penetration on the cinderblock structure common over there and even torso hits can't be reliably counted on to put the enemy down. Fun fact: Random autopsies on dead insurgents shows a high level of opiate use.

News Flash: No small arms round, save .50 BMG and a few other big boys, fairs well against Brick, rock, concrete, etc. While I whole-heartedly agree that 7.62 NATO is a far superior cartridge to 5.56, it is not a "magic round" and is still unlikely to inflict mortal injury on an enemy behind a cinderbrick wall. There is no better bullet stop than sand/rock, and cinderbricks are merely a structured version of the same.
 
- M243/9 and belt-fed not drum fed, already mentioned.

- Should have mentioned that the magazines issued for the M9 are useless. They jam up and the rounds won't feed.

- I'd like to believe that they're re-issung the 1911, but it doesn't ring true. Then again, I came home over two years ago now.

- Google Earth does not show anything in real-time. It has a mosaic of photos of the earth's surface, but they're not updated. It is beyond ridiculous to think of trying to use it to get a look at our positions.
 
Should have mentioned that the magazines issued for the M9 are useless. They jam up and the rounds won't feed.

that's the truth. as for 1911's i have seen a very few here in afghanistan but only for the ninja types and i can't be sure if they were issued or not.

the nomenclature and syntax are not particularly military, many technical errors were made, most notably the nomenclature for the saw. no marine would make that mistake. no national guard private is likely to make that mistake.

from personal experience i can tell you that well maintained weapons in good condition work very well. there are some saws that have bad/broken parts but that is most definitely not a design issue. the only really worthless piece of equipment that we are issued that i can think of is the m9's magazine - the weapon itself is excellent, even if the round is underpowered.

this thread was locked earlier but apparantly the mods haven't caught the repost yet. personally, i'm sick of people who haven't seen the elephant trying to tell me that my equipment is crap. pretty much everything we have does exactly what it was designed to do and sometimes way more.
 
DocZinn

- Google Earth does not show anything in real-time. It has a mosaic of photos of the earth's surface, but they're not updated. It is beyond ridiculous to think of trying to use it to get a look at our positions.


Be quite, we don't want them to know that. They are probably using it for determining the range from the firing location to the target if the realy are using it. A guy with a long string might attract attention.
 
Debunked

Well it's pretty full of inaccuracies and misinformation.


Subject: Great info from Iraq

1) The M-16 rifle : Thumbs down. Chronic jamming problems with the talcum powder like sand over there. The sand is everywhere. Jordan says you feel filthy 2 minutes after coming out of the shower. The M-4 carbine version is more popular because its lighter and shorter, but it has jamming problems also.

Where is a Marine getting experience with the M4? They are very limited in the Corps with the only large number in use with Force Recon units and Det-1. Both units use the M4A1. Most of the rest of the Corps is using the M16A4.

The reports coming out of Iraq actually read this way with regards to reliability:

The M16 series received widespread praise for its durability and reliability. A few soldiers expressed a desire to be able to fire the weapon after pulling it out of the dirt (“like you can do with the AK” was the perception), but there were no trends of poor reliability. This may be attributed in part to the ease of maintenance reported by the soldiers. While keeping the weapons clean in this environment was a continuous requirement it was not considered to be a difficult one.

They like the ability to mount the various optical gunsights and weapons lights on the picattiny rails, but the weapon itself is not great in a desert environment. They all hate the 5.56mm (.223) round. Poor penetration on the cinderblock structure common over there and even torso hits cant be reliably counted on to put the enemy down.

Here we go again....."Stopping power is such a subjective thing. This is from the PM Soldier Assessment Team Report:
It is apparent that the close range lethality deficiency of the 5.56mm (M855) is more a matter of perception rather than fact, but there were some exceptions. The majority of the soldiers interviewed that voiced or desired “better knock-down power” or a larger caliber bullet did not have actual close engagements. Those that had close engagements and applied Close Quarters Battle (CQB) tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) – controlled pairs in the lethal areas: chest and head and good shot placement, defeated the target without issue. Most that had to engage a target repeatedly remarked that they hit the target in non-vital areas such as the extremities. Some targets were reportedly hit in the chest numerous times, but required at least one shot to the head to defeat it. No lethality issues were voiced with targets engaged at 200 meters and beyond. It is apparent that with proper shot placement and marksmanship training, the M855 ammunition is lethal in close and long range. And a bit more on lethality:

Discussion: There have been many engagements with the M855 spanning ranges from 10 feet to 250 meters against soft targets (non-armored individuals) during OIF. Observations from the field cover many different responses from “I shot him in the gut and he ran away”, “I had to put multiple rounds in him to stop him”, to “I shot him in the chest and he went down” and “I shot him in the head and he dropped on the spot”. There are many different views on the lethality of this round ranging from the need for a heavier bullet (the need for more stopping power), to “We have no complaints with the M855 ammunition. It is satisfying the operational need.” One brigade of soldiers interviewed made a very interesting statement concerning the lethality of the M855. Their focus groups indicated that based on proper target acquisition with the improved M68 (CCO), shot placement, basic rifle marksmanship, and firing controlled pairs they were very satisfied with the round’s performance/ terminal effects.

Recommendations: A Government Lethality IPT has been stood up to standardize GEL block testing and an engineering study will be conducted extensive, soft target terminal effects of COTS and military 5.56mm ammunition. The characteristics of each bullet terminal performance will be determined. Based on requirements and using the engineering information, a new round should be type classified and made available. The complete report is available here:
http://www.bob-oracle.com/SWATreport.htm

Fun fact: Random autopsies on dead insurgents shows a high level of opiate use.

I have heard nothing about random autopsies on insurgents. I rather doubt that this is happening due to considerations for the perceptions of the Iraqi people. There would be a huge outcry not only on Al Jezerra but in our press that we were "mutilating" the enemy dead....

2) The M243 SAW (squad assault weapon): .223 cal. Drum fed light machine gun. Big thumbs down. Universally considered a piece of ????. Chronic jamming problems, most of which require partial disassembly. (that fun in the middle of a firefight).

First off, it's the M249 SAW and it's not drum fed. It's belt fed. Granted, the plastic box magazines the 200 rd belts come in, could be mistaken for a drum magazine by someone who had never seen one before, but I would think that a Marine would know the nomenclature of this weapon. Also most units are buying the nylon bags to carry the belts in because they don't rattle and fall off like the plastic box magazines,

3) The M9 Beretta 9mm: Mixed bag. Good gun, performs well in desert environment; but they all hate the 9mm cartridge. The use of handguns for self-defense is actually fairly common. Same old story on the 9mm: Bad guys hit multiple times and still in the fight.

Well the M9 has had all kinds of problems with the aftermarket magaines the military is buying, but the author leaves this out. It's been documented in many offical AARs that the Checkmate brand magazines are junk, yet they haven't been recalled and soldiers and Marines are still having problems with them.

4) Mossberg 12ga. Military shotgun: Works well, used frequently for clearing houses to good effect.

The Marines are using the Benelli 1014 shotgun. They may still field the Mossberg in some quantity. Hate to bust the author's bubble, but shotguns are used to breech. With the restrictive rules of engagement, rifles and precise shooting is the order of the day for clearing operations. Buckshot and slugs are hard to aquire in country and I have a friend who said they used birdshot to scare people who approached too close to convoys.

5) The M240 Machine Gun: 7.62 Nato (.308) cal. belt fed machine gun, developed to replace the old M-60 (what a beautiful weapon that was!!). Thumbs up. Accurate, reliable, and the 7.62 round puts em down. Originally developed as a vehicle mounted weapon, more and more are being dismounted and taken into the field by infantry. The 7.62 round chews up the structure over there.

The Army and Marines have used the M240 for years. It's the standard platoon level machine gun. They don't have to dismount them from the vehicles. The dismount kits for the M240 thats the coax gun in the Abrams and Bradley is very hard to come by. If they dismounted the M240 from the turret, it's most likely unusable in a ground mount role.

6) The M2 .50 cal heavy machine gun: Thumbs way, way up. Ma deuce is still worth her considerable weight in gold. The ultimate fight stopper, puts their dicks in the dirt every time. The most coveted weapon in-theater.

7) The .45 pistol: Thumbs up. Still the best pistol round out there. Everybody authorized to carry a sidearm is trying to get their hands on one. With few exceptions, can reliably be expected to put em down with a torso hit.

Force Recon and Det 1 are the Marine units carrying .45s. There are couple Army units that don't really exist using 1911 types and Glock 19s.

The special ops guys (who are doing most of the pistol work) use the HK military model and supposedly love it.

The special ops guys are using SIGs (Navy Special Warfare), M9s (Army, Air Force), MEUSOC 1911 (USMC Force Recon), Kimber 1911 (USMC Det 1) Various 1911s and Glock 19s (unnamed Army SOF). As a side note Springfield Armory was recently given a contract to build the new MEUSOC pistol.

The old government model .45s are being re-issued en masse.

Not true at all.

8) The M-14: Thumbs up. They are being re-issued in bulk, mostly in a modified version to special ops guys. Modifications include lightweight Kevlar stocks and low power red dot or ACOG sights. Very reliable in the sandy environment, and they love the 7.62 round.

Again not true. Some units are using modified M14s with commercial aftermarket stocks, but they are not being issued in bulk. None of the aftermarket stocks currently in use is made of kevlar.

9) The Barrett .50 cal sniper rifle: Thumbs way up. Spectacular range and accuracy and hits like a freight train. Used frequently to take out vehicle suicide bombers ( we actually stop a lot of them) and barricaded enemy. Definitely here to stay.

A single shot even from a .50 BMG isn't enough to stop a vehicle. Machine guns, especially the M2 are most used to stop car bombs. They are used to remotely detonate IEDs that are discovered and you'll find a lot of them in the hands of EOD.

10) The M24 sniper rifle: Thumbs up. Mostly in .308 but some in 300 win mag. Heavily modified Remington 700s. Great performance. Snipers have been used heavily to great effect. Rumor has it that a marine sniper on his third tour in Anbar province has actually exceeded Carlos Hathcocks record for confirmed kills with OVER 100.

The Marines don't use the M24. They use the M40, the current iteration being the M40A3. No M24s are fielded in 300 Winchester Magnum, even though they are built on the Remington long action to make this possible.

11) The new body armor: Thumbs up. Relatively light at approx. 6 lbs. and can reliably be expected to soak up small shrapnel and even will stop an AK-47 round.

We only wish it weighed 6 pounds. The IBAS with SAPI plates weighs in at just under 16 pounds and when you add in the neck, shoulder and groin protection you're back up over 20 pounds.

I cant help but notice that most of the good fighting weapons and ordnance are 50 or more years old!!!!!!!!! With all our technology, its the WWII and Vietnam era weapons that everybody wants!!!! The infantry fighting is frequent, up close and brutal. No quarter is given or shown.

I can't help but notice the author doesn't know squat about our current weapons and how they are employed. It seems to me that this is another missive written to justify someones personal opinions about what weapons our troops should be issued.

Bad guy weapons:

1) Mostly AK47s . The entire country is an arsenal. Works better in the desert than the M16 and the .308 Russian round kills reliably.

.308 Russian???? Who makes that? Is it a cusotm loading? How come the Iraqi insurgents don't use the more common 7.62x39 round? Saddam must have left tons of it stockpiled around the country. That would greatly simplify their logistics...........


3) The IED: The biggest killer of all. Can be anything from old Soviet anti-armor mines to jury rigged artillery shells. A lot found in Jordans area were in abandoned cars. The enemy would take 2 or 3 155mm artillery shells and wire them together.

The enemy didn't use 155mm howitzers...perhaps the author means 152mm??

It's been awhile since I've seen something this full of misinformation spread across the internet. I notice that these reports from the front always seem to come from a Marine. Every Marine or former Marine I've been privileged to know or serve with no matter what his rank, knew more basic information about his weapons then whoever wrote this.

Jeff
 
In the two versions of this that have hit my inbox in the last couple days, the dad is either a retired officer or retired First Sergeant, in which case the much more then slight technical errors are totally inexcusable.
This version was posted in Strategies and Tactics:
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=165259
Got this from a retired Marine First Sergeant - thought you might be interested in his son's assessment of weapons and enemy tactics in Iraq (the boy is home from his first tour, going back in early 2006, and early re-enlisted for another 4 years.)

And this was the heading on the version that was posted to the AR15-L mailing list on the 10th:

This was sent to me by a Semper Fi, UAL retired, east coast type.

Too many different headings on the same email. I stand by my assertion that this is a hoax.


Jeff
 
Correction: AK-47's shoot a 7.62 x 39 round, commonly known as 7.62 Chinese. 7.62 Russian is 7.62 x 54.

I have never heard to that as being refered to as the 7.62 Chinese. I have heard 7.62 Russian used to describe both, more often the x39.
 
Jeff White

It's landed in a neighbor's box as well. Checked SNOPES.COM as well as URBAN MYTHS and find some that come close to this one (named AS hoax's) but not this particular one yet.

As many have pointed out..there are inaccuracies that jump out at you.

Take Care
 
Jeff White said:
In the two versions of this that have hit my inbox in the last couple days, the dad is either a retired officer or retired First Sergeant, in which case the much more then slight technical errors are totally inexcusable. <snip break>

Too many different headings on the same email. I stand by my assertion that this is a hoax.


Jeff


I have to agree with you 100% on that. Merely the fact that the exact same article has been written by a retired officer, a retired 1st Sgt and now a retired Army CSM tells me this is just one of those " feel good" hoaxes you see so much of nowdays.
 
yup, just like on every other forum this has been posted on multiple times, its getting torn to shreds.
 
My Opinion as a guy whos been there, done that, and was in Fallujah with my butt on the line, a Engineer Sgt on my 2nd tour, rolled with the grunts last time around :D

The M16 and it's variants aren't the best in the world, but when it comes down to accuracy, simplicity and target engagement/reengagement it's one great battle weapon. Yeah, we have to pump 2-5 rounds in to some guys before they're dead, and nobody expects it to shoot through a brick wall. We beat the liveing crap out of these things, use them as pry bars, pound doors handles off with them, bump fire mag after mag through them and generaly neglect the liveing crap out of them. You got to keep her clean, it ain't that hard, just don't soak the dam thing in CLP, dry graphite lube works great ;) Once a mag is locked in, some electical tape over the muzzel, and a strip over the ejection port, she'll stay clear of dust.
The guys outside the wire are getting newer SAW's that are well maintained, stubby barrels, collapsable stocks, they jam here and there, but at 800 rounds per min, something is bound to catch wrong sometime and they clear easily. 800 rounds per min, think about that, and then think about how you wouldn't expect a weapon to jam cycling that fast :banghead:

The 240G, M2, M19 are true killing weapons, they're mostly vehicle mounted and almost always there to cover your 6, unless you're an extremely cool guy. The Army still has M60's too.

The M9 is a back up, that's what it was purchased for, it's a double tap weapon. (Don't know why they give one to every SNCO and Officer that doesn't really need one, all these head quarters POG's, I'd like to see them carry around a full length M16 and keep the SOB clean all the time.) The 1911's are used by the MEU's and Force Recon, you all know they bought Kimbers for Force and Det 1 and they use Wilson Combat Mags ;) They're in theater.

Shotguns, got the Mossbergs here and there, the Benelli semi auto shotguns are used by the Corps.

The M24 & M40 sniper rifles are few and far between, those boys know how to use that 7.62 round out to 1000, the Barret .50, commonly called the SASAR is good, but they don't just open up on the thugs with it, when ever they see one. We're also seeing the 25mm SASAR over here too.

One thing left out of the article, the BushMaster on the AAV's... no comment on it's capabilitys :eek: but it'll give you a chubby if you like fire power.

For you "old timers" We got the DMR's (designated marksmans rifle) it's a Springfield believe it's a M-14, synthetic stock, bi-pod and a pretty decent scope. 10 shot clips and a few 20's around too, great accuracy. The SOC guys are getting 16" M1's, that is just an other rifle that will never die, it's just heavy.

Another weapon not mentioned, the M79 BLOOPER, single shot gernade launcher is back :neener: put out of the USMC armorrys in 1984, it was brought back in March 2004 as an answer to not haveing enought M203 launchers, that is one fine weapon too.

We've got our mortar men too, and till you have 155 HEDP comeing down Danger Close and then stand up to look at what was just a target, you'll never know the power of Artty.

Some of our weapons are old, A rifle/machine gun/gernade launcher; is only a tool, it's alot of good training, hard work, team work, leadership and a hard heart, that gets the job done over here. The M2 is from WWII, and the 1911 is almost as old as dirt too.

The insergents aren't book smart, but they are determined. It's war, people die and Murphys Law is always against you. Our ROE is against most of us too. If the media, anti-war, anti-Bush and the bleeding heart humanitarians would stay out of our buissness, maybe we'd be able to clean up a bit sooner. We Destroyed Fallujah to save it ;)
 
I dont like the .223 round or the 9mm. Never have and never will. With what is available I have never understood why our armed forces went with 2 such anemic rounds. Granted they are marginally better than a rock and a sharp stick. I personally would choose something with a little more umph if I were going into harms way if I had my druthers. That said, this sounds remarkably like some teenager wannabe with too much time on his hands. I suspect we have more than a few such posting right here on the High Road.:evil:
 
They all hate the 5.56mm (.223) round. Poor penetration on the cinderblock structure common over there and even torso hits can't be reliably counted on to put the enemy down.
7) The .45 pistol: Thumbs up. Still the best pistol round out there. Everybody authorized to carry a sidearm is trying to get their hands on one. With few exceptions, can reliably be expected to put 'em down with a torso hit.
.45 ball puts down bad guys better than 5.56x45, right :rolleyes: This whole "1911 and M14 are God's gift to mankind, M16 and M9 are poodleshooters" thing was boring 10 years ago, there is not even a word for its decrepit state of played-out decroded boring annoyingness anymore. Please stop the inanity... for the children.
 
Some of this flies in the face of what my cousin tells me. He just came back from 7 months in Ramadi.

He LOVES the M4 and the TA-31 RCO they have. Fantastic weapon, he can't say enough good about it. Clears like an SMG and plenty of firepower to 400yds, with an optic that can enable shots that far. He likes the BDC of the cheveron reticule a lot too.

He thinks the M16 is just too long for the room clearing. (I;d agree.)

The Beretta M9s are a good design, but they are getting issued beat-up 20 year old guns. Had to aim one at his neighbor's 25yd target to hit his own!

Also says the M2 is the bee's knees. Nothing surprising there.

Mk19 jams all the time, POS.

M249 SAW is friggin sweet, rarely jams, though they are still issueing noisy plastic cans instead of the quiet fabric pouches.

AKs that shoot are reliable (the ones that don't fire, he says he never hears about because his guys with M4s and ACOGs put them down hard.)

I belive that summs it up so far.
 
If your M16 or M4 jams then it's not being cleaned properly, or you need to quit banging up your magazines.

I was issued a Sig 229 over there, wihch was beat all to hell but still worked ok. The mag springs were worn and had to be fixed when I firt got them.
 
I am an active duty Army Senior NCO. I have been to Iraq three times and I am looking at my 4th deployment early next year. I have served in Ramadi so I am accustom to the situation there and the environment described. I'd like to address a few of the issues brought up in the original post:
I used the M-4 and found it to be a very reliable weapon and only suffered one malfunction which was due to a bad magazine. The dust is a pain but as long as you conduct routine cleaning of your weapons and keep your dust cover closed when not in use you won't have a problem. Also, many soldier feel that because there is so much dust that they shouldn't oil their weapons. As I'm sure we all know a dry gun isn't a happy nor a reliable gun. The current ammo in use by the US military (at least the Army) is the 5.56mm green tip which offers very good penetration of vehicles, doors and of course Johnny Jihad and his man jammies. The same goes for the M249 SAW. As long as you conduct standard cleaning the weapon is very reliable and much more easier to move around than the M240. I had the opportunity to work with the Marines and they are a dedicated and hard fighting group of men. Their marksmanship program is without question the best of all services when it comes to basic training; every Marine is a rifleman first and foremost. The key word is Rifleman. The Marines, like the Army does not routinely train the average soldier on the use of pistols. The training that is given is usually very basic and in my mind not very good. So, the idea that the M9 is not a great weapon is somewhat misleading in this instance. If anything the 9mm suffers from over penetration but it is still good for what ails the typical savage. Didn't mean to rant but I tend to get tired of over criticism of the weapons in use when there really isn't a reason to complain.
 
Hey yall, I've been lurking here for a like 2 years or so.

I am a SAW gunner in the 101st Airborne 1/506. I am leaving for Kuwait in less than 2 weeks. My company will be attached to the 4th ID in Ramadi. This will be my first deployment so everything I have to say is based off of stateside training. So here is my $.02 or our current weapon systems.

My SAW is a fine weapon. We have retractible buttstocks and ELCAN M145 optics as well as peq2 laser for them. As long as it is well maintained you can beat on it all day. We are issued a few 100 and 200 round nylon 'nutsacks' for it but not enough for a full combat load so we also use the plastic drums. Two SAWs in a squad. Mine is brand new.

We have M14s also. Synthetic stocks, retractible buttstocks, and ACOGs on top. Reliable and accurate. Two in a squad, the DMs also carry M4s, one of them suppressed.

M4 - M68 aimpoint or ACOG on top. PAC4 laser on the side. Surefire on the otherside and a pistolgrip or M203 underneath. Ours are in pretty good condition. I dont like the 5.56 but keep em clean and they get the job done.

M9 - POS, Rather have a brick to throw personally. Luckily I dont have to use one. Gunners and officers have em.

M240B - 2-3 man crew. Also with ELCAN M145 and Peq2 lasers. These are a little more finicky than the SAW, but when they work they are outstanding. 2 in a platoon.

Mossberg 500. Not much to say. just a regular 500 with a pistolgrip and 18 inch barrel. We have done training with these that goes well beyond just using them in a breaching role. 2 in a squad.

So here is how my 9 man squd rolls-
Squad leader - Shotgun, Suppressed M4 with ACOG
Team Leaders - M4 with M203 and M68 red dot.
Saw Gunners - Just the SAW and 1000 rounds
DMs - M14s with ACOGs, M4s with M68, one suppressed.
Riflemen - M4s with M68, one shotgun. Possibly an AT4.

And with SAPI plates, 800 rounds of ammo, Binoculars, PVS14s, water and other incedentals, that body armor is significantly heavier than 6lbs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top