Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

What about 'frangible' rounds?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by fatfreddiescat, Mar 7, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. fatfreddiescat

    fatfreddiescat Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    79
    Location:
    CA, the home of the restricted access!!!
    If you carry for self defense only, then it seems like you would (1) want to end any threat as soon as possible, and (2) take out any assailants ASAP. So is there an argument against frangible rounds? Or am I simply misinformed? I was told they go in at caliber size, turn to "sand" and exit like a cone?! Isn't that a good thing in terms of SD? Ultimate knock-down? Please let me know if I read this wrong, or if it is legal, and sensible.
    Thanks,
    F
     
  2. LightningJoe

    LightningJoe Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    796
    Location:
    The good part of Dallas (i.e. not Dallas)
    Frangible rounds probably don't penetrate far enough, especially in situations in which you don't get an unobstructed, straight-on hit to the torso. Hollowpoints are bad enough in that area. Frangible rounds are worse.
     
  3. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    There are a few problems with these rounds.

    First, they are exhorbitantly expensive. If you are using a semi-auto, most people want to do several hundred rounds to function test it. This is going to cost you hundreds of dollars to do.

    Second, there is no significant data saying these rounds are better. No police agencies use them, and terminal effectiveness has never been studied in a way that allows one to draw a legitimate conclusion.

    Third, they will not penetrate barriers. Even heavy winter coats will cause frangibles to begin to disintegrate.

    Fourth, they may or may not penetrate deep enough into tissue to cause immediate incapacitation of your subject. A large superficial surface wound will be messy, but probably will not incapacitate your opponent.
     
  4. flrfh213

    flrfh213 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2009
    Messages:
    275
    Location:
    sw Florida
    i heard this type round is more for indoor ranges due to metal backing and indoor air quality, dont know for sure but i recall that much from asking an ammo dealer at the last gun show here in sw fla
     
  5. B yond

    B yond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    Messages:
    1,270
    According to cheaper than dirt frangibles are MORE deadly and will kill out target "dead right there..."
    :rolleyes:
     
  6. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    No, this is marketed for defense. We are talking (I think) about Glaser and Magsafe ammo.
     
  7. bdickens

    bdickens Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2008
    Messages:
    747
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Do any police departments use them?

    There's your answer.
     
  8. grumpycoconut

    grumpycoconut Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    56
    Location:
    People's Republic of **********
    magsafe and glaser are a different breed of frangibles. Real frangibles (compressed powder in a jacket) are good for very limited purposes. If you are on the government's dime and are training with rifles in a shoot house rated for pistols or are doing a lot of shooting on steel at really close ranges they are ideal. Beyond that, why bother?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page