I don't like this one, because it implies that terrorists are actually attempting to shoot down planes with .50 caliber rifles.The terrorists ... haven't been able to hit a single plane yet.
I don't like this one, because it implies that terrorists are actually attempting to shoot down planes with .50 caliber rifles.
It seems pretty clear to me that it is referring to "such a firearm" based on the design of a "semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use". Where does a revolver figure into that?
I think you're misreading that section.
But, to move on, where does this come from? "currently held models would be confiscated and destroyed"?
This bill is bad enough without adding any extra "scare factor" to it.
Not my fault the section is overly vague and easily misconstrued.
The text of the "grandfather provision" suggests that NO previously owned firearms will be exempt from the ban. That would mean all currently held models would be confiscated. And since they're illegal under the law, they'd be destroyed.
That pretty clearly says that paragraph 1 (which says: It shall be unlawful for a person to manufacture transfer, or possess a semiautomatic assault weapon.) will not apply to firearms that are own when it is enacted.
And the 2nd Amendment CLEARLY says that our right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed, but once you get lawyers reading it all bets are off.