coltrane679
Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2004
- Messages
- 377
"Medical Weed is quite different than RKBA.... I hope"
The Commerce Clause jurisprudence is what is--the 2A will have little bearing on that. WHO can regulate guns is a Commerce Clause issue--jut like medical marijauna. WHAT regulations they can impose is a 2A issue. You are mixing up the two, thus leading yourself away from your original question (states v. Feds).
In short, it is meaningless to talk about guns being different from medical marijuana--if the Commerce Clause is interpreted broadly (which it has been for about 70 years), then guns will almost certainly fall under it--which would answer, pretty conclusively (under current practice) your question about the states v. the Fed.
2 diiferent issues, 2 different fights.
The Commerce Clause jurisprudence is what is--the 2A will have little bearing on that. WHO can regulate guns is a Commerce Clause issue--jut like medical marijauna. WHAT regulations they can impose is a 2A issue. You are mixing up the two, thus leading yourself away from your original question (states v. Feds).
In short, it is meaningless to talk about guns being different from medical marijuana--if the Commerce Clause is interpreted broadly (which it has been for about 70 years), then guns will almost certainly fall under it--which would answer, pretty conclusively (under current practice) your question about the states v. the Fed.
2 diiferent issues, 2 different fights.