What is inside the buffer by LBE Unlimited

Status
Not open for further replies.

zaitcev

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2016
Messages
1,258
I have an AR-15 buffer that has something moving inside, likely an additional weight. The whole thing is kept together by a roll pin that does not want to move, so I cannot just take the buffer apart and have a look.

Whatever it is, it makes an irritating sound. But besides that, is it safe for weights to be moving inside the buffer?

lbebuffer.jpg

{Update - At first I thought it might be lead shot, because of the sound it made. But the buffer is not excessively heavy. It probably contains normal steel weights, but someone at LBE forgot a spacer.}
 
Last edited:
Some educational reading for you: http://thearguys.com/ar-facts/difference-ar-15-buffers/

The slide weights in buffers increase dwell time at full recoil and help suppress bolt bounce on closing like a dead-blow hammer. Both are important for proper feeding and firing in full auto applications. When I'm running adjustable gas and can compensate for the change in weight, I just remove the guts from the buffer. A semi-auto gun really does not need them.

Except for some historical curiosities like the anti-bounce spring and latch on Early Lugers (removed for not really doing much) I don't know of any semi auto designs that have incorporated anti-bounce features (slide weights or otherwise).
 
Not sure if this counts, but early Mars pistols had a bad problem with bounce of cartridge lifter, so Gabbet-Fairfax eventually incorporated an anti-bounce feature where trigger release released the bolt. This allowed the bounce to settle while pressed trigger held the bolt open.
 
Not sure if this counts, but early Mars pistols had a bad problem with bounce of cartridge lifter, so Gabbet-Fairfax eventually incorporated an anti-bounce feature where trigger release released the bolt. This allowed the bounce to settle while pressed trigger held the bolt open.
That was a weird gun for sure. Unfortunately it has so many other problems. Every military who tested the gun told Gabbet-Fairfax the same thing: lighter, smaller, and less powerful, but he did not listen. 220 gr@1200 fps! The complexity of the gun was way over the top too.

Mike
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top