Howdy gentlemen
I've recently been using the Hornady 178 gr. BTHP Match bullets out of my Styre CISM rifle.
Being Hornady doesn't show a BC on their web site for this bullet I wonder what it actually is.
Take a look at the overall shape as opposed to say a 168 or 175 gr Sierra MK. or even a Nosler 168 gr CC.
The Hornady bullet looks pretty sleek by comparison. I'm trying to get an accurate BC for it.
Reason: The Hornady bullet is about 50 fps slower than the 168 gr. Sierra or Nosler bullets but requires to dial in 1 inch less elevation to hit the same spot at 600 yrds.
175 gr. Sierra MK's going at the same fps requires almost a full 2 inches less elevation to hit the spot.
My ballistics calculator using generic data gives me a bc of .524 but I think it's higher than that.
What say you
I've recently been using the Hornady 178 gr. BTHP Match bullets out of my Styre CISM rifle.
Being Hornady doesn't show a BC on their web site for this bullet I wonder what it actually is.
Take a look at the overall shape as opposed to say a 168 or 175 gr Sierra MK. or even a Nosler 168 gr CC.
The Hornady bullet looks pretty sleek by comparison. I'm trying to get an accurate BC for it.
Reason: The Hornady bullet is about 50 fps slower than the 168 gr. Sierra or Nosler bullets but requires to dial in 1 inch less elevation to hit the same spot at 600 yrds.
175 gr. Sierra MK's going at the same fps requires almost a full 2 inches less elevation to hit the spot.
My ballistics calculator using generic data gives me a bc of .524 but I think it's higher than that.
What say you