Whats my Colt SAA worth? Any tips for maintenance?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you aware that Colt currently advises in their owner’s handbook that Single Action Army revolvers should not be fired because of the real or potential loss of value?
:eek:

In the not too distant past, I started a thread here inquiring about the STI Texican SAA. Several posters, noting the MSRP, opined I'd be better off with something that actually said "Colt".

...guess I should've specified: I intend to shoot it.

While I would be delighted to inherit a gun that shouldn't be shot, I can't picture ever buying one.
 
"A gun like that's only worth the memories."

The gun is worth a lot monetarily and the price is only going up. That being the case, if it were mine (I have one very similar, made in '76 that was new in box), and I don't hesitate in shooting it. A Colt is always going to be worth a Colt and you buy a gun to shoot it. Otherwise, it could be made by Mattel. But that is me. If it were my gun, I'd shoot it, but if you do, you chance devaluaing it's monetary value. Me, the shooting value always exceeds the monetary value.
 
The Colt SAA Owners manual is 44 pages(hmmmm) and most of it is dedicated to political correctness, liability, and avoiding any possible lawsuits. Of course writing up stuff about not using your Colt and depreciating it. That can be applied to a new car as well, keep it on blocks with the air out of the tire in the garage..................
I would rather have the new manual with all it's blaze orange warnings then anything like a discalimer written on the barrel.

There is even an extra leaflet describing how 200,000+ people are killed every year required by the Massachusets Att. General; that Colt has to put in their gun boxes now.
It's all PC/BS and nothing more.
 
Note everyone here telling you to shoot it don't have 1 cent in it.

At the rate Colts are gaining value if you shoot it you are devalueing the gun seriously.

So heres mine Your Grandfather never shot why should you have to?

But it is YOUR gun if you can take 10 $100 bills and just burn them go ahead shoot it or even cock and spin the cylinder a few times. Hope it feels real good, cause you are spending lot's to do it.
 
Note everyone here telling you to shoot it don't have 1 cent in it.

Uh... neither does he. It was a gift from his grandfather. A gift his grandfather would most likely want him to enjoy.

If his grandfather had wanted him to have something to put back as an investment, I'm betting he'd have given Will a savings bond instead of a nice Colt .357 mag.

Like I said earlier, too many people get all balled up with money, and think that's an item's only value.

No matter though... The real solution to this question is for Will to simply ask his grandfather what his opinion is on the subject. I'm sure he'll get an ear-full. ;)



J.C.
 
Jamie C.:

Well money isn't necessarily unimportant. Last I knew it's the stuff that one usually uses to buy more toys. :scrutiny:

However in the present case, "will learn" didn't buy the revolver but obtained it from a Grandfather. Grandpa bought it over a quarter-century ago, but didn't shoot it, although I'm sure he could have done so if that was his intention. So if the original owner kept it pristine is there some good reason we should urge the present owner to go out and shoot it? Particularly if it will be he, and not those that advice him to shoot it, that will suffer any loss of monetary value as a result?

Yes, Grandpa could have could have invested the money in stocks, bonds, certificates of deposit, etc. but he chose to buy the gun – perhaps realizing that he could enjoy (but not necessarily shoot it) while it appreciated.

I have several friends that have nice gun collections; mostly consisting of ones they enjoy shooting. They financed a large part of those guns by using the profits they made trading in collectables and classics. I always considered them to be pretty smart. Maybe you’d see it differently.
 
While I landed on the "don't shoot it" side of those chiming in, a man's gotta know his limitations.

I could probably leave an inherited arm unfired. However, I have a clear vision of what would happen if I actually bought one for myself...

It'd come out of the safe fairly often; it would be stared at and held such that it caught the light at different angles. I would want to "turn" it but for a time would ignore the voices and return the thing, pristine, to the safe.

Each time it came out, the temptation would grow.

I would read the manual, and seeing the advice not to "turn" it, I would inevitably begin to wonder if it, in fact, could be turned. After all, Colt could have shipped a non-functioning firearm and who would ever know? It could be missing parts and filled with epoxy, crushed granite and dead bugs. Perhaps if I thumbed the hammer to half-cock the loading gate would fall off, the cylinder would bind and a screeching sound would be heard.

Sooner or later, I'd have to know...
Back comes the hammer... SPIN ... Ah! All is well.
I feel better but much poorer.

Perhaps those with the strange mixture of OCD, extended childhood and curiosity that I am cursed with should simply not buy pristine single action revolvers with "Colt" stamped on them.

Fortunately, I believe my affliction is rare, perhaps unique. I know I've never heard anyone with an "unturned" SAA wonder out loud if the thing would function or had been welded into a single monolithic block of metal by some prankster in the supply chain.

But 'cha really don't know, do you?

;)
 
Last edited:
I love my Colts and shoot them yearly, then a good cleaning and back to the safe. The 3 on the right are Colts.

P7050095.gif
 
Jamie C.:

Well money isn't necessarily unimportant. Last I knew it's the stuff that one usually uses to buy more toys.

However in the present case, "will learn" didn't buy the revolver but obtained it from a Grandfather. Grandpa bought it over a quarter-century ago, but didn't shoot it, although I'm sure he could have done so if that was his intention. So if the original owner kept it pristine is there some good reason we should urge the present owner to go out and shoot it? Particularly if it will be he, and not those that advice him to shoot it, that will suffer any loss of monetary value as a result?

Yes, Grandpa could have could have invested the money in stocks, bonds, certificates of deposit, etc. but he chose to buy the gun – perhaps realizing that he could enjoy (but not necessarily shoot it) while it appreciated.

I have several friends that have nice gun collections; mostly consisting of ones they enjoy shooting. They financed a large part of those guns by using the profits they made trading in collectables and classics. I always considered them to be pretty smart. Maybe you’d see it differently.

Fuff, based on what Will Learn has posted here, I can't help but think his grandfather gave him the gun to SHOOT.

He said he'd been wanting a SAA in .357, then his grandfather surprised him with the Colt. Was this simply a coincidence, or did granddad know about Will's wanting just such a gun?

As for the gun not being fired... could be gramps just never got around to it.
I can't imagine such a thing ever happening to me, but I do concede that it's possible. *shrug*

So, once again, I'd be curious to hear what Will Learn's grandfather has to say on the subject.

And as for people that collect things just for their value... to each their own.

I've collected many things over my life time... guns, comic books, knives, cars... Hell, even ex-wives, it seems. But never the first one of any of those things that I didn't use for their intended purpose. And even at that, I still managed to make money off of 'em, if I cared to. Making money was never what I set out to do though. Just not my cup o' tea.


J.C.
 
GUN NUT - "It's a 3rd Gen Colt SAA not a more desireable 1st or 2nd gen..."

Yeah, that's right. Those third generation Colt's Single Actions aren't worth much.

Just last week I sold an early production third generation Colt's S.A. Frontier, 4 3/4" bbl., .357 Magnum, slightly used (I'd shot about 150 rounds through it.), but in pristine condition, in the original box with papers, sambar stag grips and factory grips for the piddling sum of $2,000.00. Guy was pleased to get it.

I'm not advising either way as to "Shoot," or Don't Shoot." Just giving an estimate of what that revolver might be worth, presently. It would certainly be worth more than the one I sold, as it's "Unfired."

Of course, depending on location, they bring more money some places, than others. :)

FWIW. L.W.
 
I was in a similar situation. I was given old family arms, 1897 win shotgun and 1894 rifle, both are takedowns. They hopefully will never leave the family, so I had the rifle restored, It now looks like it came off the winchester line! And it shoots straight as an arrow! When I get some more time, and money, I will send the shotgun in and have the same restoration work performed.

This leads me to today. A few years ago I thought I would save Colt from going out of business, so I bought a couple of SAAs. Carefully saved every bit of paperwork and put the guns in the safe. Next trip to the range included the SAAs. Are they worthless? Well they are worth less monetarily if I were to try and sell them. But I would be hard pressed to take them from my children's hands to sell. To me now they are worth more because they will be passed down to my children who will carry on a family shooting tradition.

Side note; I have two children, so I tend to buy in twos so they will each have one of "dad's" guns. This is something for you "single" guys to think about.
 
Come on, guys... the indication is very strongly that his Grand Dad wanted him to shoot the gun... look what he wrote:

I was looking into getting a new .357(SAA) when my grandfather suprised me with the Colt.

He wanted a gun to shoot and the old gentleman gave him the Colt. I say care for it, keep it clean and oiled, but SHOOT it with standard factory loads, or the reloaded equivalent.

I know if I were so fortunate as to have a family firearm passed down to me, it would mean immeasurably more if my dad/grandpa had carried it, fired it... USED it.

So... my view is that you should shoot it... and yes, take your Grandfather with you. Enjoy the gun with him. IMO, THAT will add real value to the piece.

StrikeEagle
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top