Respectfully...
TANGENT WARNING PROVIDED IN ADVANCE...
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dorrin79 DO NOT DISCONNECT THE MAG SAFTEY! ... If,God forbid, you ever have to protect yourself with that Hi-Power with a disconnected mag saftey YOU WILL BE SUED FOR NEGLIGENCE. To many sharks in suits out there. Read some of Massod Ayoob's articals and you'll understand.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This has been widely discussed on the board and widely discredited. An action job has the potential to do as much legal damage as a mag disconnect removal. In the end its either you had the right to shoot or not that will decide what happens.
By argument:
If,God forbid, you ever have to protect yourself with that Hi-Power with a disconnected mag saftey YOU WILL BE SUED FOR NEGLIGENCE.
It is entirely possible that you will be sued after a lawful shoot regardless of any modifications made to the piece. Will a magazine safety be used against you if sued? Absolutely, you can count on it. Will it factor into whether you are criminally liable? Maybe not. Will some jury award some grieving MMMer with a "misunderstood" child civil liabilities? It's a risk.
Too(sp corrected) many sharks in suits out there. Read some of Massod Ayoob's articals and you'll understand.
Yes there are sharks. Mr. Ayoob has written articles supportive of avoiding modifications, types of weapons, or even named weapons (e.g. Wilson Combat Close Quarters Battle) because of risk of unfavorable outcome regarding lawful shoot determination, OR civil liability. I'd concur that there is probably a consensus on this board who would rather be tried by 12 than carried by 6.
This has been widely discussed on the board and widely discredited.
HOWEVER, to describe the argument as "discredited" is probably an overstatement. It's a risk worth considering...but one many of us would prefer to LIVE WITH.
An action job has the potential to do as much legal damage as a mag disconnect removal.
The mere deployment of a firearm in self-defense exposes you to potential criminal and civil "issues". Something that Mr. Ayoob also describes...and teaches as I understand. I intend to take a class from LFI on this topic because while it is unlikely to be determinative in my choice of weapon or mod's made to it...it cannot be dismissed...lawful shoot very likely = legal entanglements.
In the end its either you had the right to shoot or not that will decide what happens.
Oh how I wish this were true...in the end, it's whether the jury is disposed to side with you, or the grieving MMMer' mom with the "troubled child" you had to defend yourself from...and whether your legal counsel is more effective in persuading that jury than the shark on the other side.
Safe shooting,
CZ52'