Updated my numbers to reflect some of the discussion and comments, and did another comparison of some of the possible AR cartridges. Hold on to your hats, cuz we’re using one chart to look at
TWO things - OWG and trajectory for the following:
7.62x39, 125 gr, 2,400 fps
6.8 SPC, 115 gr, 2,630 fps
2.5 WSSM, 120 gr, 2,980 fps
Horizontal axis is range in yards out to 500. Right vertical axis is trajectory in inches. Left vertical axis is OGW in pounds live weight.
Russian vs. SPC. Even though I detuned the 7.62x39 down to 2,400 fps the OGW is still about the same as the 6.8 SPC. The model predicts the effectiveness on game animals would be nearly identical. The Russian is good for a 150 lb animal out to 200 yds, or so. The SPC 250 yds. Not a big deal, IMO. OGW: advantage equal. (You math haters, take it easy. They’re just numbers. Serenity now, serenity now.
). The SPC does have better ballistics. It will zero at 225 yds for a 6-inch point-blank-range. The Russian zeros at 200 yds for the same 6-inch target. At extended ranges the SPC is marginally better, from the standpoint of drop, but not enough to get excited about. Ballistcally: small advantage to the SPC.
The .25 WSSM clearly rules the roost. Here I went with the 120 bullet, as opposed to the 90 grainer in my earlier post. That gives a significantly higher OGW. Higher at 175 yds than the Russian and SPC are at the muzzle. Significantly better ballistic. The WSSM is good for a 150 lb animal out to 500 yds. 250 yds zero for a 6-inch PBR. Drops only 36 inches at 500 yds,
AND has the “umph” to get’er done at long ranges. Flat shooting, hard hitting. What’s not to like? Availability? I guess that’s it. One year wait on uppers, someone said.
No surprises, really. Even with these new numbers I don’t think I would change my bottom line. IMO, the Russian is the common sense choice. It’s available, affordable, reloading components abound, and in my view the SPC (or the Grendel, for that matter) has nothing over the Russian. As a deer hunter I don’t think the slight range advantage of the SPC is significant. At least at the ranges that I would engage.
Performance wise, the WSSM is king of the hill, as long as you stick with the heavy for caliber bullets. It does have the largest case, holding 52 grains of water. (The SPC holds 46, and the Russian 36 grains). Handloaders would have a good chance of matching factory ballistics. The trade off is much higher first cost, more complicated conversion, and a long waiting period for parts. If you have the time and bank roll, go for it. It looks like a barn burner. Basically, .243 Win or .260 Rem like performance in a AR-15 platform.