Both Rock-ola (receiver and barrel, other parts unknown)
First with a really dinged up, dented high wood stock, with 2 rivet handguard, and crossed cannons on buttstock (maker unknown). Round bolt, with stamped trigger housing and milled type 2 rear sight.
Second visually nicer (less dings/dents) low wood stock (no cannon on stock, instead a large G), with 4 rivet handguard. Flat bolt, milled trigger housing, stamped type 2 rear sight. This gun $30 more.
Would the flat bolt, nicer looking stock, and milled trigger housing be worth choosing over the other? Metal looks equal.
First with a really dinged up, dented high wood stock, with 2 rivet handguard, and crossed cannons on buttstock (maker unknown). Round bolt, with stamped trigger housing and milled type 2 rear sight.
Second visually nicer (less dings/dents) low wood stock (no cannon on stock, instead a large G), with 4 rivet handguard. Flat bolt, milled trigger housing, stamped type 2 rear sight. This gun $30 more.
Would the flat bolt, nicer looking stock, and milled trigger housing be worth choosing over the other? Metal looks equal.