Who else would benefit from CA legal AR and AK parts?

Status
Not open for further replies.

El Rojo

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
2,540
Location
The People's Republik of California
Who else has assault weapon bans similar to the PRKs? With the new off list lower craze, we have all sort of CA compliant parts that make your AR legal. What other states could be missing out on this and would benefit from these parts? Here is a PRK refresher.

12276.1. (a) Notwithstanding Section 12276, "assault weapon" shall
also mean any of the following:
(1) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has the capacity to
accept a detachable magazine and any one of the following:
(A) A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action
of the weapon.
(B) A thumbhole stock.
(C) A folding or telescoping stock.
(D) A grenade launcher or flare launcher.
(E) A flash suppressor.
(F) A forward pistol grip.
(2) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has a fixed magazine
with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds.
(3) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has an overall length
of less than 30 inches.

So to sum up what parts we have.

1. The Prince50 magazine lock which turns your detachable magazine rifle into a non-detachable magazine rifle (therefore the rules don't apply)
2. The MonsterMan Grip for AR15s and AK47s. With a bull barrel/muzzle brake and a fixeded stock, there are no evil features so you can have detachable magazines.
3. The U-15 Grip/Stock that allows for a pretty natural hold in something that is not a pistol grip or thumbhole stock.

Who else would benefit from knowing these things are out there? Anyone? I am not sure what the laws are like in other places.
 
It (non pistol grip stock) could benefit a Connecticut resident, if they wanted to give up the pistol grip for a threaded muzzle.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top