Justin
Moderator Emeritus
Has anyone else noticed that so many older guns just have terrible sights? I mean, you look at a modern pistol and you usually have great big sights with some sort of dot or triangle, or glowing vial of radoactive goo that just screams 'look at me! Don't forget, front site!'
But then you look at a lot of older guns, even nice ones, and it seems like back in the day, the sights were pretty chincy. You get a thin blade for the front sight (usually the same color as the rest of the weapon) and not a whole lot in the way of a rear sight.
What gives? Surely the art of shooting hasn't changed that much in the last 50-100 years. Has it just been a matter of continual refining of weapon design, or something more?
But then you look at a lot of older guns, even nice ones, and it seems like back in the day, the sights were pretty chincy. You get a thin blade for the front sight (usually the same color as the rest of the weapon) and not a whole lot in the way of a rear sight.
What gives? Surely the art of shooting hasn't changed that much in the last 50-100 years. Has it just been a matter of continual refining of weapon design, or something more?