Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Why Hillary Hates Guns

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by XD-40 Shooter, Jan 23, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. XD-40 Shooter

    XD-40 Shooter Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Messages:
    914
    Get a load of this article, it should scare the crap out of you. I think its very credible too. I'm not trying to start anything political here, just putting the info out there, which I think is very pertinent.

    http://www.poe.com/?page_id=1301
     
  2. .38 Special

    .38 Special Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,303
    Location:
    Orange County, CA.
    I dislike Hillary as much as anyone, but I think the article is off-base. The article is essentially saying that the left is against guns because the right owns most of them, but will be for guns once they have most of them. The essential flaw with the argument is that there's nothing stopping the left from going out and buying guns.

    IMO, Hillary doesn't like guns for the same reason most of the left don't like guns: they don't trust commoners.
     
  3. langenc

    langenc Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Messages:
    921
    Location:
    Montmorency Co, MI
    She dont dislike guns. All her bodyguards have them. She will soon have many more bodyguards.

    As noted she dislikes us with guns. It is one of those "Horrah for me to HExx with you"
     
  4. .38 Special

    .38 Special Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,303
    Location:
    Orange County, CA.
    "She doesn't dislike guns. She dislikes us with guns."

    That's a heckuva line.
     
  5. Winchester 73

    Winchester 73 member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,576
    Location:
    Miami,Florida
    COLUMN 12.03.07: Why Hillary Hates Guns



    by Richard Lawrence Poe
    Monday, December 3, 2007
    Past Columns


    SUMMARY: We all know that Hillary Clinton is America’s leading gun-hater. But why? The explanation may lie in the teachings of her one-time political mentor Saul Alinsky.




    HILLARY CLINTON is America’s leading gun-hater. This is no secret. Her “F” rating from the National Rifle Association merely confirms the obvious. More perplexing is why she hates guns. The explanation may lie in the teachings of Hillary’s one-time political mentor Saul Alinsky.

    As noted in last week’s column, Alinsky was a radical organizer who got his start building militant community groups in Chicago slums during the 1930s. Young Hillary met him through a leftwing church group in high school. She wrote her senior thesis about Alinsky at Wellesley College, and remained friends with him until Alinsky died in 1972. After law school, Alinsky operatives got Hillary an appointment to the House Judiciary Committee’s Watergate investigative team in 1974.

    Hillary’s ties to Alinsky run deep. Her tactics have long borne his imprint.

    In 1971, Alinsky wrote Rules for Radicals, a book destined to change the American left. In it, Alinsky mocked Sixties radicals as dilettantes who loved to talk revolution, but shunned the hard work of organizing the masses.

    Especially irksome to Alinsky was loose talk of guns and bombs.

    Such talk was fashionable in the Sixties. Student protestors loved quoting Chairman Mao’s 1938 statement, “Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun”.

    Some activists, like those of the Black Panther Party, went beyond mere words. In their ten-point platform of October 1966, the Panthers declared, among other things, “The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States gives a right to bear arms. We therefore believe that all black people should arm themselves for self-defense.”

    On May 2, 1967, Panther boss Bobby Seale led some 20 armed Panthers into the California State Capitol Building in Sacramento, brandishing loaded rifles, shotguns and pistols. They were protesting the Mulford Act, a pending bill that would bar Californians from carrying guns in public or in vehicles.

    Police arrested Seale and five others, but pressed no weapons charges. Carrying guns was still legal in California. Prosecutors ended up charging the Panthers only with disturbing the peace.

    Young Hillary Rodham supported the Black Panthers. At Yale, she helped defend the New Haven Nine, a group of Panthers who tortured to death a suspected police informant. Hillary worked closely with Panther attorney Charles Garry on the case. She was put in charge of monitoring the Panther trial for civil rights violations.

    Despite her work on behalf of the Panthers, Hillary may have developed doubts about their tactics. Her mentor Saul Alinsky had harsh words for Panther gunmen. In his book Rules for Radicals, Alinsky expressed “contempt” for “those who leave their dead comrades and take off for Algeria or other points”.

    Alinsky was no pacifist. In Rules for Radicals, he wrote, “The power of a gun may be used to enforce slavery, or to achieve freedom”. He rejected violence for practical reasons, not moral ones.

    The problem with America, Alinsky wrote, was that rightwingers had more firepower than leftists. This made violent revolution impractical. “`Power comes out of the barrel of a gun!’ is an absurd rallying cry when the other side has all the guns,” Alinsky admonished his readers.

    In Rules for Radicals, Alinsky noted approvingly that Lenin renounced violence upon returning to Russia from exile in April 1917. The Tsar had abdicated, but Social Democrats now controlled the government. Lenin’s Bolsheviks were outnumbered and outgunned.

    Alinsky explained, “The essence of Lenin’s speeches during this period was `They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and for reformation through the ballot. When we have the guns then it will be through the bullet’ And it was.”

    Lenin did not have to wait long. He siezed power in an armed coup in October 1917.

    As long as the right has more guns, the left should oppose guns, Alinsky concluded. Only when the balance of power shifts, and “appropriate weapons” became “available” to the left, should leftists consider turning to violence.

    To what extent Senator Clinton adopted Alinsky’s thinking on revolutionary violence we can only guess. However, her policy on guns is clear, whatever her motives may be. She seeks to disarm the American people, while arming herself to the hilt.

    Hillary exhorts us to give up our guns for the common good. For herself, she aspires to the Presidency, from which perch she would wield power as America’s top law enforcement official, highest-ranking intelligence officer and commander-in-chief of the mightiest army, navy and air force in the world.

    Something about this deal does not strike me as equitable. Or wise.
     
  6. Scorpiusdeus

    Scorpiusdeus member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    740
    Location:
    Ventura County, California
    I hate to break up the Hillary bashing party, but you guys need to wise up.

    There are liberals who hate guns and even some conservatives.

    Like it or not some people actually think guns are dangerous and that your every day citizens aren't capable of dealing with the responsibility of having a firearm. Sadly, many of our fellow gun owners give these anti gun folks plenty of ammunition by doing stupid crap with our firearms. It's just a fact.

    I'm a liberal and I LOVE my guns. I know them, I practice with them and I enjoy them, I don't fear them. Some liberals do.

    It's not always about Liberals versus conservative, haves versus have nots. Sometimes it's just different stroke for different folks.

    I'll fight them at every turn, but I don't always take it personally.
     
  7. jlbraun

    jlbraun Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2005
    Messages:
    2,213
    See my sig.
     
  8. Zoogster

    Zoogster Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    5,074
    Interesting article, and with a lot of good assumptions.
    However they are just that, and attributing the beliefs of one person to another based simply on thier relationship is faulty.

    Hilary appears to oppose firearms in the hands of most American civilians, left or right.
    I would be more inclined to believe she supports confiscation of all firearms outside of government control (though politicly is smart enough never to say that.)
    Even if she did believe as the article states, and most firearms are possessed by the right, then working towards disarming all of America would disarm more of the right.
     
  9. ColinthePilot

    ColinthePilot Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    1,029
    Location:
    I don't even know anymore
    I disagree. Different strokes for different folks implies that those who don't like guns would be ok with me having guns and vice versa. Most of the time, that is not the case. You see it on THR all the time. Many members here want EVERYONE to be armed(within legal and practical limits i.e. fellons, drunks, etc.) and I bet that a similar percentage of folks who don't like guns dont want ANYONE to have them.
     
  10. Grandpa Shooter

    Grandpa Shooter Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2007
    Messages:
    930
    One, two, three, lockdown. You know it's coming!
     
  11. Scorpiusdeus

    Scorpiusdeus member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2006
    Messages:
    740
    Location:
    Ventura County, California
    Well, I don't think it implies that at all, but o.k. I still don't think Hillary's position is rooted in some desire to keep the peasants in line.
     
  12. jakemccoy

    jakemccoy Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,601
    Location:
    Northern California
    It sounds like Hillary hasn't spent any quality time at the range with a knowledgeable, friendly instructor.
     
  13. XD Fan

    XD Fan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2006
    Messages:
    1,011
    Location:
    Stuck up here (rural Missouri) and got Dixie on my
    Interesting read. Logic seems faulty. I think Zoogster is spot on.
     
  14. jhansman

    jhansman Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2007
    Messages:
    949
    Sigh. Forgive me for singing the same song again and again, but who the HEdoubletoothpicks cares what Hillary hates or loves? If you want to worry about her restricting your gun rights and access, keep her in the Senate! That's where she and her kind can do the most damage, NOT in the White House. Focus on the courts and legislators; that's where restriction happens.
     
  15. 22-rimfire

    22-rimfire Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    11,287
    Location:
    TN
    I care what Hillary loves and hates. It is a reflection of her life's experience which has served to construct her character. Since Shumer gets elected in NY, I can easily see why Hillary is popular in the empire state.
     
  16. RTFM

    RTFM member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,140
    Location:
    Land of ID
    I.b.t.l.
     
  17. 2nd 41

    2nd 41 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2007
    Messages:
    726
    She would throw our guns into the toilet and.......
     

    Attached Files:

  18. Firepower!

    Firepower! member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2008
    Messages:
    723
    I just dont like her period.
     
  19. Walkalong

    Walkalong Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    45,653
    Location:
    Alabama
    Wise up?. She hates guns. She wants the goverment to run your life. No secrets here.
    Of course it is. She is a socialist. She wants big goverment. She thinks she and others can run your life for you and that the slums/stupid people/tragic accidents/etc will go away if smart folks like her are running our lives. She, and others, just don't get the fact that you can not save peole from themselves. She would change who runs things from real world smart, successful, wealthy people to the government full of lazy, often stupid, BS'ers who talk a good game, but that is about it. Our problems will not go away. There will just be different people in charge, and it won't be us.
     
  20. Dorryn

    Dorryn Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2006
    Messages:
    583
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
    In before the lock.
     
  21. cornman

    cornman member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2007
    Messages:
    472
    She is not a socialist. What matters is what kind of socialism we have. What we have now is a wealfare state for corporations and the wealthy. They make the laws, take your money, and get you to fear legislation that would the nation and the middle and lower classes. Some big gov't things work better most don't. Administration Costs for single payer health care runs around 5%, but under the for profit system we have it is 30-40% We need to stop listening to the corporate owned media and wake up. BTW There is no liberal media! This idea that the major media is liberal was made up by the right wing shill Lee Atwater and he has even said he was supprise how well that lie has worked.
     
  22. Bitmap

    Bitmap Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2005
    Messages:
    209
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    Are you kidding?
     
  23. Dravur

    Dravur Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    2,742
    Location:
    Longmont, CO
    So many errors... it is frankly unbelievable. Sometime, take a Macro Econ course and tell me who pays the income taxes in this country, who creates the jobs and where wealth is created.
    Also, please look at the costs in the British Health Care system and take a REAL hard look at the inneficiencies and quality of care in their system. Or Canadas

    If profit is so bad, why don't we put the food industry or the car industry or the oil companies under government control. After all, it's for the children.

    Sheesh
     
  24. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    The leftist extremists' self-appointed mission is to rule us commoners, not trust us.
     
  25. xjchief

    xjchief Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Messages:
    443
    Location:
    People's Banana Republic of Hawaii
    My take on it is that Hillary and folks like her fear an armed population. It is the last veto power the people have against the government and that fact scares the heck out of people who think the government should control us, not serve us. Beware of anyone who tries to take your gun, they want to take more than that from you. :scrutiny:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page