Why the grain discrepancy?

Status
Not open for further replies.

coondogger

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2009
Messages
552
Same bullet, same powder, different starting load. For a .223, 45 gr Jacketed spitzer and H322, Lyman lists 24.5 grains for a starting load while Hogdon lists 23. Even stranger, the max loads differ. I’ve decided to follow Hogdon’s data, but what gives?
 
Different techs doing the testing, different lawyers, different lots of powder, different atmospheric conditions, different test fixtures/firearms, different phases of the moon, different year the testing was done and so forth.
 
Ballistic lab conditions vary from differing sources conducting the testing procedure.

One technician might be using a universal receiver with a 1:7 twist

While another lab technician across the country is using a 223 action from larue tactical with a 1:8 twist.

Not saying this is 100% the answer but it happens more than you think and COULD be a contributing factor...
 
Like said, conditions and equipment and even powder lot numbers differ in each testing lab.

I usually use a consensus of multiple sources when first setting up for loading a new cartridge/powder combination. I approach the upper end carefully and most times have no need to put to the top because an accurate load is found before I reach the limits.
 
You didn't think those Max Charge numbers were absolute did you?

This illustrates why it's so funny to see people wrap themselves around precise conformance with charge or COAL data; ALL of that data is measured by someone, on some day, in some weather, in some test barrel, with some batch. . . and if you change any of those inputs you should expect to see at least a few % change in pressure.

The data is a guideline. Start low, and pay attention.
 
Different techs doing the testing, different lawyers, different lots of powder, different atmospheric conditions, different test fixtures/firearms, different phases of the moon, different year the testing was done and so forth.

Emphasis on the different lawyers and techs! Last week I was a part of a weld audit for a very large assembly at work, 4 different weld inspectors bickered like children over what was ok and what was not, even though there was a clear, outlined standard in place. A fancy job title means nothing. Sorry for the rant, but I think that's got a lot to do with it
 
I use the lightest start load and the heaviest max load. Generally there is something good in between the two. I usually don't go off the reservation unless it's an old neutered cartridge in a newer action.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top