JR47
Member
Really? I suppose that blaming anything or anyone is simply "tired and outdated" thinking to today's generations. Then again, they DO get exactly what they deserve with that infantile thinking, right?
QC is responsible for insuring that the products, and their components, meet the design specifications. They have no other purpose. The failure of QC, for whatever reason, be it worn-out machinery, incompetent handlers, or even specifications in design, is what causes consumers to complain.
As the designs used were proven to work well for, oh, about a century, that isn't the issue.
Trying to get anyone to believe that the buyer of multiple manufacturers of firearms wouldn't understand the manufacturing processes in Marlin is similarly ludicrous, no matter how outdated one finds the idea.
All in all, the only thing useless and out dated so far, is the idea that QC isn't responsible for, if nothing else, alerting the senior management of the issues encountered. No matter the century.
QC is responsible for insuring that the products, and their components, meet the design specifications. They have no other purpose. The failure of QC, for whatever reason, be it worn-out machinery, incompetent handlers, or even specifications in design, is what causes consumers to complain.
As the designs used were proven to work well for, oh, about a century, that isn't the issue.
Trying to get anyone to believe that the buyer of multiple manufacturers of firearms wouldn't understand the manufacturing processes in Marlin is similarly ludicrous, no matter how outdated one finds the idea.
All in all, the only thing useless and out dated so far, is the idea that QC isn't responsible for, if nothing else, alerting the senior management of the issues encountered. No matter the century.