Remember... Friends don't let friends buy Hi-Points.
hmmm; provocative, introspective, philosophical, and passionate. Such insight could compete with Aristotle and Plato. The only problem is: There's absolutely no substance behind it at all.
mcdonl was so correct in his last post. You definitely can't change some people's minds. But to be honest, I never want to change people's minds. That's totally up to them to change or not change their own mind. In life, we all have a perspective. We see life differently. We appreciate it differently. As such, how we interact with it will be different. This is good. It makes life interesting and the journey it truly is. However, when a part of life is debated because of differing perspectives, I am not trying to change another person's mind. I'm trying to figure out their perspective.
Basically, how did the topic under discussion affect that person. Then, we can learn from each other's perspective and experiences. This learning can lead to better decisions on our part. And that is what life's journey is all about. Here comes the problem; you knew there was going to be one, in my opinion. There are people that give their opinion, their perspective, and their experience on a topic, but they are misleading the readers. Are they intentionally lying? No, they don't mean any harm. They passionately believe in what they are saying. Unfortunately, they don't know what they are talking about. Like gglass and his philosophy. It's a rhetorical statement that only has 1 response by the reader....."WHY"? He implies that Hi-Points are junk. Yet, like the VAST MAJORITY of people who put down Hi-Point, or Honda, or Samsung, or any product in the world; gglass has no true experiences. He has no true perspective. He has no valid opinion. And his opinion only promotes misinformation. Like the old timers who have perpetuated the concept that dry firing any gun is bad, wrong, evil. That you MUST change the oil in your car every 3,000 miles; even if the owner's manual says 7,500. Ignorance can be bliss, but it can also be really stupid.
Some will say that they don't have to take cocaine to know that it's bad for you. Well unfortunately, cocaine isn't bad for you if you use it properly. It's been used for medicinal purposes by doctors for years. Same with morphine and many drugs. There is some truth in anecdotal evidence and proof. The problem is, those who are trying to take this approach are biased, rationalizing, and do not want to know the truth. In the case of the hi-point, they are trying to rationalize how much money they spent on their weapon. The same anecdotal evidence that they will use as their argument, they refuse to see when it doesn't support their position. And that anecdotal evidence is: The overwhelming majority of hi-point owners; probably in line with the percentage of glock, S&W, springfield, etc... owners; are very happy with their hi-points and it's reliability and dependability.
So, when people want to give their opinion on a topic, any topic, their opinion can only be respected if it has some facts to back it up. Of course, many will simply hide behind their "right" to speak, and they feel they shouldn't have to be responsible for what they say. This isn't about trying to change another person's mind or opinion. Only they can change their mind or opinion. It's about providing information to substantiate their opinion. And when a person can't do that, then their opinion doesn't deserve the respect they are seeking.