Why'd they have to put restrictions on PG STock Rifles?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe when gripping a PG stock a nerve in your hand is depressed causing your evilness to increase 3200% Thus capable of turning the Pope into a seething, mass murdering, Satan Worshipping, Son of a gun!!!!

Or maybe the political elite in your particular area are suffering from the ailment below.





76-head_up_ass.jpg



Take your pick, but I prefer the latter theory.
 
What's so bad about the Pistol Grip?

Well "it is a feature of military rifles, that allows you to spray bullets from the hip and has no place on a sporting rifle".

That is the actual logic behind it. The actual reason they were banned is because so many modern military rifles have that feature in common.
 
Well "it is a feature of military rifles, that allows you to spray bullets from the hip and has no place on a sporting rifle".

Well, if they're worried about people "spraying bullets from the hip," they should REQUIRE all long guns to have a pistol grip, as the spraying-bullets-from-the-hip method of marksmanship is inherently less accurate.
 
Because pistol grip stocks are nontraditional looking compared to the late-1800's aesthetic of most wooden-stocked hunting rifles, and many anti-gun extremists consider them Scary Looking. Which is enough to get them banned...

Another factor (and perhaps the main reason PG stocks were a target) is that the prohibitionists want to ban ALL self-loaders, but realized early on that that would be political suicide. So they concocted a features list that would exempt many traditional-looking self-loaders like the mini-14 and Remington 7400, while grabbing as many of the others as they could.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top