Will USPSA drop the stupid 10 rd. limit on Production???

[ChristopherG]

Got it; I knew that was true for revolver division, but being able to use .357 in an N-frame makes L10 a pretty attractive option. Thanks for the clarification.

 

[Krag]

IDPA is in turmoil? Ya'll gotta be kidding. What have the street combat purists got to argue about?

 

[sigma40sw]

As the above note says 357 mag does make major, He uses magnum cases and a 200 gr hard cast lead bullet. It's a S&W Performance Center Revolver.
It will easily make the 165 PF, in fact he last chronoed at 172.

Sigma40sw

 

[Krag]

Well, it looks like I'm outvoted on this forum. Sigh.........

But I'm still going to keep sending e-mails to USPSA and keep campaigning for a rules change. :banghead: What else have I got to do?

 

[Hoser]

What else have I got to do?

Stop emailing Sedro. The delete key is too easy to use. Hanging up and a member is much harder to do.

I would start off at the club level. Start a petition there. From there move to the section level with your petition. Then on to state and area, ect.

Be prepared to show, not tell, how the change will be good for USPSA as a whole, not just good for you. Be prepared to show them that IPSC does not have the 10 round limit and they are doing much better than USPSA. If you say that you want to be able to load your Para LDA to 18 rounds, they will tell you to shoot Limited. Just a heads up.

Things can be changed. The other SC from Colorado and I got Colorado moved from Area 1 to Area 2. It was not just our idea, but the wishes of an overwhelming majority of shooters in both Areas. Emails did nothing. Phone calls and face to face meetings with Jake, Bruce and Mike followed by a lot of work got it done.