Winchester PDX1 Bonded.

Status
Not open for further replies.
In my recent experience the QC of PDX1 9mm 124+P has been very bad. This involves several boxes of ammo. The cases were especially bad, but the bullets also had defects of their own. Deep gouges and deep dents on the case walls. Some bullet cavities had big sludges of lead inside. The cases were generally dirty and NOT smooth. A few of the bullet jackets had 50% of the visible jacket covered with a very thin smooth baked on layer of lead.

The technology seems impressive, but the quality control is VERY troubling. This is not White Box ammo but $1 per round premium ammo. Based on my experience I would not buy this stuff in large quantities. Having to wait 4 weeks for an examination/exchange with Winchester is not a pleasure.
 
picked up a few boxes of 165gr PDX1s at Walmart the other day... out of the 4 boxes I had to toss 3 bullets that showed severe dents in the cases. One of the dents was so bad it pierced the case and you can see the base of the bullet through the gouge.

I'll keep buying it, but I will inspect every round before packing.
 
Last edited:
i've gotten HST's with dents in every single of the 50 rounds in the box. i've only bought two 20 round boxes of PDX1, didn't have any dents, but i did notice the bullets were "dirty" looking...
 
No excuse for magic bullets selling for over $1/round to have defects.
I did buy a box of PDX1 38spl +P for my pocket J frame. Have not had a chance to shoot any yet, but the bullets and cases look perfect.
 
Since I am not a LEO and would never need to shoot through a windshield or door to stop a BG I really don't need a bonded ammo.

Well, what if some guy is trying to run you down with his vehicle, or is shooting at you at home from behind concealment?

The Ranger T is a better design for my needs, that is, strictly for self defense whether outside or in my house.

Ranger-T works pretty well against even windshields, too. The bonded version is only a minor improvement in this regard.

Besides, Ranger T is quite a bit less expensive so I can practice with it much more often.

PDX1 is the same as Ranger Bonded, which typically costs the same as Ranger-T. They just charge civilians more for the same ammo. :rolleyes:

Sure, if you'll pay for my lawyer after I shoot someone leaving the scene in his vehicle.

Then don't ever do that, regardless of what load you're carrying. :confused: On the other hand, what if the bad guy is coming after you in his vehicle rather than leaving?

Lawman Ranger T will do every thing that is needed in a self defense scenario, at least according to Winchester. And after testing it myself I tend to agree with them.

By design, it does everything that law enforcement requires, including killing people behind barriers such as windshields and automotive sheet metal. There are other brands of defensive ammo that perform poorly at these tasks, and some people prefer those for that very reason, but I'll stick with ammo that can punch through barriers for defensive purposes, myself. Ranger-T is fine for the latter, and there is no reason to knock PDX1/Ranger Bonded for being slightly better at it.

The technology seems impressive, but the quality control is VERY troubling. This is not White Box ammo but $1 per round premium ammo.

I certainly agree in principle, as I've stated in the past, but I should point out that it's not always like this. In my experience, such poor quality control is unusual even for Winchester White Box (USA). Obviously something is wrong, and hopefully they'll get it fixed soon. All of my .40 S&W PDX1 rounds--and I have hundreds on hand, mostly packaged more economically as Ranger Bonded--have been clean and as pristine as I could expect any mass-produced ammo to be. On the average, my factory practice ammo is dirtier cosmetically, although only a very few rounds had noticeable dings, and all were fit to shoot. The 9mm PDX1 rounds that you're talking about were majorly messed up though, which just isn't normal (or acceptable).

i've gotten HST's with dents in every single of the 50 rounds in the box.

:eek:

i've only bought two 20 round boxes of PDX1, didn't have any dents, but i did notice the bullets were "dirty" looking...

All of mine have been clean, but I have several boxes of Ranger FMJ practice rounds that are the filthiest (on the outside) new ammo that I've ever seen :uhoh:; I also have a couple of boxes of the latter with clean rounds, by the way. I've bought dirty rounds (didn't know until I opened the boxes) from every manufacturer at some point or other, although they've always shot just fine. I guess these days they seldom stop to thoroughly clean their equipment or whatever.
 
Last edited:
^^lol i still have some of the 40cal HST's with the dents in the shells. i found a few threads about it on various forums, apparently a lot of folks got them. it causes no probs (yet is still disturbing lol).
 
Well, what if some guy is trying to run you down with his vehicle, or is shooting at you at home from behind concealment?



Ranger-T works pretty well against even windshields, too. The bonded version is only a minor improvement in this regard.



PDX1 is the same as Ranger Bonded, which typically costs the same as Ranger-T. They just charge civilians more for the same ammo. :rolleyes:



Then don't ever do that, regardless of what load you're carrying. :confused: On the other hand, what if the bad guy is coming after you in his vehicle rather than leaving?

I think you've been watching too many movies. If some BG is already in his vehicle I am already leaving the area or taking cover. My house is a Santa Fe style and has 12" thick walls, not many handguns will penetrate plus if I'm at home my 12ga with slugs are with me. I live in a very rural area as well.

As far as costs, PDX1 costs about $1.05 per round for a box of 20, Ranger Bonded costs about $.80 per round for a box of 50 and Ranger T costs about $.78 per round again for a box of 50. So given the characteristic I want I'll stick with the Ranger T. Besides the wound characteristics for Ranger T are better.
 
I think you've been watching too many movies.

There are a great many people who would say that we all have been for carrying guns in the first place.

If some BG is already in his vehicle I am already leaving the area or taking cover.

Who said that he was ever out of his vehicle? Vehicles make great road rage weapons (I've heard about actual cases in my local area), and not just on video games. I guess the 9/11 terrorists were watching too much TV--specifically the pilot episode of "The Lone Gunmen"--and playing too much "Flight Simulator" when they crashed some vehicles into the World Trade Center towers. Nah, that's just crazy Hollywood stuff--it would never really happen and it wouldn't work anyway.... :uhoh:

My house is a Santa Fe style and has 12" thick walls, not many handguns will penetrate plus if I'm at home my 12ga with slugs are with me. I live in a very rural area as well.

OK, but for the general public reading this, you never know when being able to punch through a wall or other obstruction with lethal force could come in handy, even at home for defensive purposes. No house is completely impregnable.

As far as costs, PDX1 costs about $1.05 per round for a box of 20, Ranger Bonded costs about $.80 per round for a box of 50 and Ranger T costs about $.78 per round again for a box of 50. So given the characteristic I want I'll stick with the Ranger T. Besides the wound characteristics for Ranger T are better.

That's fine as Ranger-T will give you the capability even if you never expect or intend to have to use it, but there are some who are opposed to even having such a capability at all, which was the more extreme perspective that I also touched on.
 
There are a great many people who would say that we all have been for carrying guns in the first place.



Who said that he was ever out of his vehicle? Vehicles make great road rage weapons (I've heard about actual cases in my local area), and not just on video games. I guess the 9/11 terrorists were watching too much TV--specifically the pilot episode of "The Lone Gunmen"--and playing too much "Flight Simulator" when they crashed some vehicles into the World Trade Center towers. Nah, that's just crazy Hollywood stuff--it would never really happen and it wouldn't work anyway.... :uhoh:



OK, but for the general public reading this, you never know when being able to punch through a wall or other obstruction with lethal force could come in handy, even at home for defensive purposes. No house is completely impregnable.



That's fine as Ranger-T will give you the capability even if you never expect or intend to have to use it, but there are some who are opposed to even having such a capability at all, which was the more extreme perspective that I also touched on.

What is portrayed in movies or on TV was not my motivation to carry. What is, is my time in service in Viet Nam and over 20 years as a news photographer in Los Angeles. I have seen more than my share of violence.

As far as the general public reading this, I'm not sure that’s what this board is catering to. And as far as what Ranger T is capable of, at least as far as I understand from the tech at Winchester it is not designed to hold together like a bonded bullet therefore would be less likely to over penetrate. But again, that is just my understanding.
 
If the FBI bought $54 million of it, they must have done pretty extensive testing first. Expansion and penetration is good but they still need to feed reliably in every agents gun.
 
What is portrayed in movies or on TV was not my motivation to carry.

I didn't say it was, but a lot of people think we're all being paranoid "cowboys" nonetheless. I think they're wrong, but that's what they believe. You may think I've watched too many movies and base my preparation on that, but I disagree with that as well. That was my point.

As far as the general public reading this, I'm not sure that’s what this board is catering to.

Anybody could be reading everything we post, and that's the audience I usually have in mind.

And as far as what Ranger T is capable of, at least as far as I understand from the tech at Winchester it is not designed to hold together like a bonded bullet therefore would be less likely to over penetrate. But again, that is just my understanding.

It is designed to perform well at the same tasks--it only lacks a certain technology or process (i.e. bonding) that came along later. Its weight retention by percentage when shot through various barriers according to the FBI test protocol, using 180 grain 40 S&W as an example here, is: 91, 96, 95, 98, 99, 99, 85. For comparison, the 180 grain .40 S&W PDX1/Ranger Bonded load achieves the following: 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 87. While the bonding process does make a difference, the difference in terminal performance is hardly vast. Even the bonded rounds got chewed up by auto glass, which is represented by the last number in each list, but the Ranger-T held together very nearly as well, getting 12" of penetration into gelatin afterward versus 12.4" for PDX1 (not a significant difference).
 
Even the bonded rounds got chewed up by auto glass, which is represented by the last number in each list, but the Ranger-T held together very nearly as well, getting 12" of penetration into gelatin afterward versus 12.4" for PDX1 (not a significant difference).

That's one of the reasons I stopped using PDX1. Ranger T is less expensive but just as good for my needs.
 
That's one of the reasons I stopped using PDX1. Ranger T is less expensive but just as good for my needs.

And even what you don't expect to need, for good measure. :) The reason that I use PDX1/Ranger Bonded, however, is not for the bonding and the resulting slight improvement in bullet integrity, per se, but the fact that certain loads penetrate more on the average in the most common cases, and I favor around 18" of penetration (or even a tad more) if I can get it. All of this simply gives us more choices, and if a Ranger-T, HST, or Gold Dot load better suited my own preferences with regard to terminal performance, then I would have selected it instead. As for cost, $0.02 more per cartridge is not going to influence my decision much, since I shoot so few actual defensive rounds in comparison to FMJ practice rounds.
 
I'd say the pdx is among the latest and greatest, right along with hst and gold dots. I'm sticking with my proven gold dots though.
About 18 months ago when 45 ammo was nearly impossible to get, I found a 1000 rounds of Ranger 45 ammo that was going for nearly what FMJ was going for. Needless to say, I bought it. At this point, I've probably got 400 rounds of Rangers thought the bedside/backup to shotgun pistol. I know for a fact that ammo works flawlessly through this pistol. I'm disinclined to change as well since I would likely want to duplicate the test with the PDX's and that would be pricey.
 
I've picked up a couple boxes of this 9mm+P from WM. Out of three boxes, one round has a tiny little dent in it, but not big enough to keep me from shooting the round. I haven't shot any of it yet, but I will tomorrow.
 
-I tested some PDX1 .38spl (130gr +P) in my 2" revolver. The bullets fully penetrated the 15" block of calibrated gelatin I was using

-Nope, this was just some at home testing. Knox gelatin is no problem for me to get but a chrono is a bit spendy for me right now.

Revolving Garbage

FYI, Knox food-grade gelatin is not the same as calibrated ordinance gelatin. My bet is that the Knox stuff is far less dense. That is probably why your 125g .38+P made it through 15+" of the stuff.
 
FYI, Knox food-grade gelatin is not the same as calibrated ordinance gelatin. My bet is that the Knox stuff is far less dense. That is probably why your 125g .38+P made it through 15+" of the stuff.
Like I said, I did calibrate this stuff to the best of my ability. It wasn't perfect, but what you have to understand is that how "dense" the mixture is has next to nothing to do with it being food-grade, its all in how you mix/prepare the stuff.

I think the penetration of the PDX1 has a lot to do with its shape. A full mushroom shape presents much more resistance to penetration than does the triangular petals of the expanded PDX1. It has a wide wound tract, while the total frontal area is less than a full mushroom shaped bullet of the same size.
 
i've seen quite a few tests online where the PDX1 9mm/40/45 didn't expand properly.

clearly winchester needs to check their QC. obviously the technology is sound, as it passed the FBI's stringent tests.


i do have a disturbing theory--maybe the PDX1 for sale to the public didn't pass QC to sell to the FBI......:eek:

i've gotten plenty of garbage white box winchester 9mm NATO ammo that caused malfunctions in my glock 19. after close inspection of the shells i noticed there was this black "crud" in the extractor grooves.

Federal's always been my favorite JHP maker, so it's not a big deal to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top