What would I like to see Ruger manufacture?
I would like to see Ruger make a clone of the Marlin 1894 in 357 magnum. For whatever reason, Marlin seems to have fallen asleep at the switch. I’ve had an 1894c in 357 on backorder for almost a year and my dealer has no idea when they will become available.
I like the rugged, robust, and over-engineered approach that Ruger uses in making their guns. I like that they are made in USA.
I’m not looking for a revival of the 96/44. Although I’ve never actually seen one in person, the looks in the catalog photos never appealed to me.
I’m not looking for a Winchester clone. There are plenty of those on the market. I own several Winchesters and they are fine rifles, but the Marlin 1894 has several features that I prefer.
Three features that I am really like are:
I like the solid top that allows for the easy mounting of aperture sights or optics on the receiver.
I like the way the bolt comes out for easy cleaning of the barrel from the breech.
I like the side loading port for the tube magazine. One can easily top off the magazine in the middle of the action. Also, here in New York State, detachable box magazines can be problematic.
I would like to see it first in 357 magnum/38 Special.It is important to me that it handle both the 38 and 357. One source of irritation with my Winchester 1892 is that is does not feed standard length 38s. I have to load them to an OAL of 1.505 or greater to feed reliably.
No doubt there would be a market for 44 mag and 45 Colt as well.
What added features would I like? Taking an example from their Gunsite scout rifle, I would like to see a receiver mounted aperture sight and a forward mounted Picatinny rail right from the factory.
I don’t know if there any patent issues regarding clones of the Marlin 1894. Certainly there are lot of clones of the 1894 and 1892 Winchesters. Seeing that Ruger is now making a 1911 clone, I hope they would consider the lever gun clone as well.
If this gun came out tomorrow, I would be first in line to buy one.
I would like to see Ruger make a clone of the Marlin 1894 in 357 magnum. For whatever reason, Marlin seems to have fallen asleep at the switch. I’ve had an 1894c in 357 on backorder for almost a year and my dealer has no idea when they will become available.
I like the rugged, robust, and over-engineered approach that Ruger uses in making their guns. I like that they are made in USA.
I’m not looking for a revival of the 96/44. Although I’ve never actually seen one in person, the looks in the catalog photos never appealed to me.
I’m not looking for a Winchester clone. There are plenty of those on the market. I own several Winchesters and they are fine rifles, but the Marlin 1894 has several features that I prefer.
Three features that I am really like are:
I like the solid top that allows for the easy mounting of aperture sights or optics on the receiver.
I like the way the bolt comes out for easy cleaning of the barrel from the breech.
I like the side loading port for the tube magazine. One can easily top off the magazine in the middle of the action. Also, here in New York State, detachable box magazines can be problematic.
I would like to see it first in 357 magnum/38 Special.It is important to me that it handle both the 38 and 357. One source of irritation with my Winchester 1892 is that is does not feed standard length 38s. I have to load them to an OAL of 1.505 or greater to feed reliably.
No doubt there would be a market for 44 mag and 45 Colt as well.
What added features would I like? Taking an example from their Gunsite scout rifle, I would like to see a receiver mounted aperture sight and a forward mounted Picatinny rail right from the factory.
I don’t know if there any patent issues regarding clones of the Marlin 1894. Certainly there are lot of clones of the 1894 and 1892 Winchesters. Seeing that Ruger is now making a 1911 clone, I hope they would consider the lever gun clone as well.
If this gun came out tomorrow, I would be first in line to buy one.