Wood or composite stock?

Status
Not open for further replies.

PATH

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
2,844
Location
Rockland, New York
Which one do you prefer and why. Do you use both but in different situations. My Rem 700 is so dinked that I might buy a composite stock.
 
Path: I would take a composite stock any day over wood. I used to have nice Claro walnut on a pair of Shilen DGA Varminter rifles.......I said goodbye. I want stability and toughness in a stock. To me the painted composite is beautiful in its utility. Wood massages the eyes, but when it gets scratched it hurts.....sorta like ruining a fine painting. Mcmillan and HS Precision are the two most popular, I think.
 
Wood! Always wood! Some of the synthetics out there hurt my eyes when I look at them, they're so ugly. The best looking ones just look bad. If you must do something besides wood, at least use a nice looking laminate. Some of the Boyd's aren't bad.



[edited for typos]
 
Last edited:
I think it depends upon the rifle. I like the plastic of my HK's. I also like the beautiful wood on my older bolt actions.
 
Both have their place in my collection. I will admit to being a freak about laminate though..
 
It's hard to beat how a nice wood stock and blued barrell looks,but it's almost impossible to use it and keep it looking nice.

Nowadays I prefer synthetic and stainless for durability.Some of those laminate stocks with stainless look pretty sharp.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top