RocketMan
Member
I might vote for AlGore if he ran for Village Idiot.
Otherwise, no.
Otherwise, no.
Would you vote for Gore?
- Thread starter ghost squire
- Start date
- Status
GrammatonCleric
Member
Al Gore
No, simply because I cannot vote for an indecisive, border-line mentally unstable leftist. He is perpetually blown about by the winds of popular opinion. I need a candidate that stands for FREEDOM first and foremost.
No, simply because I cannot vote for an indecisive, border-line mentally unstable leftist. He is perpetually blown about by the winds of popular opinion. I need a candidate that stands for FREEDOM first and foremost.
Hkmp5sd
Member
Nope. Never.
You do NOT want Colin Powell. Check his views on several topics, including gun control.
You do NOT want Colin Powell. Check his views on several topics, including gun control.
I don't think we have much to worry about with Gore. His probable opponent in the primaries is a nasty knife fighter who's probably already got oppo research video clips of him mouthing idiotic inanities all queued up. There's a reason she's been tacking to the right all these months; just so she can prove how far outside the "mainstream" wannabe's like Gore are.
That Gore is anti 2A is obvious from his support of the AWB. That he's a raving lunatic druid who would send our economy into the crapper, that he would gladly yield US sovereignty to the UN, is obvious from reading "Earth in the Balance" or watching him speak lately. And yet some people support him. :banghead:
I wonder if his supporters have actually read "Earth in the Balance." Now there's a way to get inside his mind and see how it operates. It's not a pleasant experience for those who value US sovereignty and a working economy.
That Gore is anti 2A is obvious from his support of the AWB. That he's a raving lunatic druid who would send our economy into the crapper, that he would gladly yield US sovereignty to the UN, is obvious from reading "Earth in the Balance" or watching him speak lately. And yet some people support him. :banghead:
I wonder if his supporters have actually read "Earth in the Balance." Now there's a way to get inside his mind and see how it operates. It's not a pleasant experience for those who value US sovereignty and a working economy.
bogie
Member
Since when did the Democrats use THR as a sounding board to see how else they can get someone to vote for Anyone But a Republican?
Oh...
Never mind...
Oh...
Never mind...
tegemu
Member
I was dead set against him and when he ridiculed Oliver North for being concerned about his family's safety after receiving death threats against him, then - Gore REALLY got on my S%$t list.
JohnBT
Member
"When Teresa Heinz Kerry is only paying 15 % capital gains tax on her inheritance money, while a working man pays 28% on his earned income, she is not paying her fair share."
15% x $1,000,000 = $150,000
28% x $50,000 = $14,000
Looks to me like she's paying more than her share.
John
15% x $1,000,000 = $150,000
28% x $50,000 = $14,000
Looks to me like she's paying more than her share.
John
flashman70
Member
I would never vote for AlGore. The man has gone 'round the bend. Even if he weren't nuts I wouldn't vote for him. He undermined the constitution and tried to steal an election. He put Jamie Gorelick in the the DoJ. He gave his wife tongue in front of millions. I actually worked for his right-hand guy (Roy Neal) for about a year and that was enough to make me a lifelong enemy of Algore and his ilk. Never, never, never. If you put a gun to my head and said "Al or Hillary - vote for one." I still wouldn't vote for Gore.....and Hillary is Satan.
david_the_greek
Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2005
- Messages
- 533
I find it odd when people poke fun and blame Democrats because they are all for big government and out of control spending.....have you been hiding in a bugout shelter (I wish i was in one right now) for te past 6 years.... i'm pretty sure we've run up a bit of government spending and governemnt has done nothing but get bigger and over step more boundaries. If gore were pro gun I would probably vote for him if it were a decision between he and bush again. seems to me like my rights might be a little safer. I don't know too much about all his past political follies but if it came between him and dubbya again I'd vote for him hands down. +1 Nitrogen. i don't understand why people think liberal is such a dirty word. liberal=liberty. oh and lets not bash colin powell, he's done a bit for this country and he could have helped our country out alot in the world had he been listened to and also in the war. Hes a man with alot of sense. not so fond though of the covering up he did in vietnam, that wasn't such a good thing. and I'm going to go hide in my reloading room now in anticipation of someone tearing me a new one.
gunsmith
member
I voted for dems for over 20 years
I hate racism, I hate the way the working class is allways bohica
by corporations....but the dems allways give you lip
service about how they are hunters
and you don't need an AK47 to hunt with.I AM SICK TO DEATH OF THAT STUPID, STUPID ARGUMENT
I don't hunt and hardly ever even eat meat...maybe once or twice a year!
none of my guns are so called hunting guns.
they are all pistols and AR's and millitary type rifles.
I'm getting a semi AK asap.
my guns are for killing nazi's and those who imitate them.
I hate racism, I hate the way the working class is allways bohica
by corporations....but the dems allways give you lip
service about how they are hunters
and you don't need an AK47 to hunt with.I AM SICK TO DEATH OF THAT STUPID, STUPID ARGUMENT
I don't hunt and hardly ever even eat meat...maybe once or twice a year!
none of my guns are so called hunting guns.
they are all pistols and AR's and millitary type rifles.
I'm getting a semi AK asap.
my guns are for killing nazi's and those who imitate them.
MCgunner
Member
I woundn't vote for Gore for dog catcher. He did a good job of playing himself on South Park, though! ROFLMFAO!
PS, I'd vote for Condi for president! She'd be the first woman and the first black and I don't see why she won't run. She'd be excellent!
PS, I'd vote for Condi for president! She'd be the first woman and the first black and I don't see why she won't run. She'd be excellent!
Deanimator
Member
On what POSSIBLE basis could I EVER believe him?
He's as dishonest as John Kerry and his "hunting license".
He's as dishonest as John Kerry and his "hunting license".
Dear Ghost Squire:
No, I couldn't vote for Al Gore due to the fact he seems totally vapid of common sense, and apparantly is very, very mentally unbalanced.
He actually stated he believed he alone discovered the environmental hazard known as the "Love Canal", and additionally stated he believes he was responsible for inventing the Internet.
Be it from some type of mental impairment, or be it purposeful prevarication, he has acted unstable, on numerous occasions. Additionally, he has come to epitomize the word "Hypocrite".
As evidence, I would offer his never ending self-rightous pontifications about how irresponsible all the "greedy" oil companies are, while owning a huge amount of oil company stocks.
But even more so, was his astounding "No Controlling Legal Authority" statement regarding being linked as a "Bag Man" in the Buddhist Temple-Chinese Government-Johnny Wong fund raising debacle. Just because he was fortunate enough not to have been indicted, or censured by the Senate, does not mean there was no controlling legal authority. It just meant the controlling legal authority did not have the courage to do the right thing at the time.
Regarding the Al Franken comment (in your original thread posting) Mr. Franken believes Mr. Gore is a shining example of today's Far Left Wing of the Democrat Party. For once, Al Franken is right about something.
No, I couldn't vote for Al Gore due to the fact he seems totally vapid of common sense, and apparantly is very, very mentally unbalanced.
He actually stated he believed he alone discovered the environmental hazard known as the "Love Canal", and additionally stated he believes he was responsible for inventing the Internet.
Be it from some type of mental impairment, or be it purposeful prevarication, he has acted unstable, on numerous occasions. Additionally, he has come to epitomize the word "Hypocrite".
As evidence, I would offer his never ending self-rightous pontifications about how irresponsible all the "greedy" oil companies are, while owning a huge amount of oil company stocks.
But even more so, was his astounding "No Controlling Legal Authority" statement regarding being linked as a "Bag Man" in the Buddhist Temple-Chinese Government-Johnny Wong fund raising debacle. Just because he was fortunate enough not to have been indicted, or censured by the Senate, does not mean there was no controlling legal authority. It just meant the controlling legal authority did not have the courage to do the right thing at the time.
Regarding the Al Franken comment (in your original thread posting) Mr. Franken believes Mr. Gore is a shining example of today's Far Left Wing of the Democrat Party. For once, Al Franken is right about something.
woerm
Member
collectivoleftist claptrap
GoRon,
Al Gore would destroy our economy with his environmental extremism.
+1
He may once have been pro 2a but sat on his hands while the loonyleftist parts hijacked the dimwits. Which is (one) reason I call them dimwits.
They long ago abandoned Democratic principles.
Could you imagine Humphrey or Eugene McCarthy or even Truman getting past New Hampshire at all?
r
GoRon,
Al Gore would destroy our economy with his environmental extremism.
+1
He may once have been pro 2a but sat on his hands while the loonyleftist parts hijacked the dimwits. Which is (one) reason I call them dimwits.
They long ago abandoned Democratic principles.
Could you imagine Humphrey or Eugene McCarthy or even Truman getting past New Hampshire at all?
r
I would not vote for Al Gore under any circumstances.
He is hardly "liberal"; he is an authoritarian theocrat.
"Theocrat?" you ask. Yes. He's a secular theocrat who has bought hook, line and sinker into the articles of faith of environmental extremists who see humans as bad, and who want to tear down the industrial systems that keep us fed and warm. This system has made it possible to pursue meaning in life that goes beyond just scraping enough food to survive. It has given us life expectancies unseen in all of human history, and it has brought the luxuries historically reserved to a tiny group of brutal slavemasters, to many people, without enslaving others.
Gore has joined this pseudo-religion because he thinks it can give him power, and he intends to force it on the rest of us.
That's what I mean by "theocrat."
He is hardly "liberal"; he is an authoritarian theocrat.
"Theocrat?" you ask. Yes. He's a secular theocrat who has bought hook, line and sinker into the articles of faith of environmental extremists who see humans as bad, and who want to tear down the industrial systems that keep us fed and warm. This system has made it possible to pursue meaning in life that goes beyond just scraping enough food to survive. It has given us life expectancies unseen in all of human history, and it has brought the luxuries historically reserved to a tiny group of brutal slavemasters, to many people, without enslaving others.
Gore has joined this pseudo-religion because he thinks it can give him power, and he intends to force it on the rest of us.
That's what I mean by "theocrat."
Steve 48
Member
Can't trust him or his party on the gun issues. He went too far left. Steve 48
Dain Bramage
Member
And don't forget to use really small words.
Sorry, that's as civil as I can be.
Would I vote for Al Gore? Absolutely.
1. When the International Olympic Committee adds the discus catch to the summer games, Al Gore gets my vote for team captain.
2. When a new Pulitzer is awarded for "Outstanding Work of Plagiarism," and they decide to name the award after someone who has made a career of the field, "The Al Gore" gets my vote.
3. When the Nobel Committee adds a prize for "absurd claim about a non-original thought that in turn led someone else to discover or invent something significant," I'm voting for Dr. Gore.
4. When, on the one hand, we have global warming, the energy crisis, illegal immigration, Iran, terrorism, and the bird flu, while on the other hand we have Al Gore, and I am asked to cast the deciding vote for the one that presents the greatest and most pressing threat to the American nation and its values . . . I'll vote for Al Gore.
5. When "everyone" is doing an album of cover songs, and I am on the board of the record company, and the board is voting for the one person who will under no circumstances be allowed to appear in a video singing "Sweet Child of Mine," while doing the "Axel dance," I'll vote for Al Gore.
(Sorry about that one; it was an image that just came out of nowhere--a lot like the things that come out of Al Gore's mouth.)
6. When Al Gore, Satan, a festering leper, two of those space bugs from Starship Troopers, and I are in a lifeboat in the middle of the ocean, I'll vote for Al Gore to be thrown overboard. There may appear to be be no logical reason to do this at the time, as we will have plenty of food and water, the Coast Guard will be in constant contact with us via our radio and their S&R team will be a quickly approaching dot on the horizon. Nonetheless, I will not only vote for him, I will be his self-appointed campaign manager. After all, some seem to think the guy walks on water.
(AL Gore. Good grief.)
MiG
1. When the International Olympic Committee adds the discus catch to the summer games, Al Gore gets my vote for team captain.
2. When a new Pulitzer is awarded for "Outstanding Work of Plagiarism," and they decide to name the award after someone who has made a career of the field, "The Al Gore" gets my vote.
3. When the Nobel Committee adds a prize for "absurd claim about a non-original thought that in turn led someone else to discover or invent something significant," I'm voting for Dr. Gore.
4. When, on the one hand, we have global warming, the energy crisis, illegal immigration, Iran, terrorism, and the bird flu, while on the other hand we have Al Gore, and I am asked to cast the deciding vote for the one that presents the greatest and most pressing threat to the American nation and its values . . . I'll vote for Al Gore.
5. When "everyone" is doing an album of cover songs, and I am on the board of the record company, and the board is voting for the one person who will under no circumstances be allowed to appear in a video singing "Sweet Child of Mine," while doing the "Axel dance," I'll vote for Al Gore.
(Sorry about that one; it was an image that just came out of nowhere--a lot like the things that come out of Al Gore's mouth.)
6. When Al Gore, Satan, a festering leper, two of those space bugs from Starship Troopers, and I are in a lifeboat in the middle of the ocean, I'll vote for Al Gore to be thrown overboard. There may appear to be be no logical reason to do this at the time, as we will have plenty of food and water, the Coast Guard will be in constant contact with us via our radio and their S&R team will be a quickly approaching dot on the horizon. Nonetheless, I will not only vote for him, I will be his self-appointed campaign manager. After all, some seem to think the guy walks on water.
(AL Gore. Good grief.)
MiG
Brother in Arms
Member
not only no but HELL NO
Brother in Arms
Brother in Arms
orionengnr
Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2005
- Messages
- 5,715
guess we covered most of it
but there is one dead horse I have to beat (or is it a straw man...or a red herring?) Someone made a statement about taking money from the poor and giving it to the rich. I "Snopes"ed this, and while they have questions about the original author, they do not try to refute the premise.
For your consideration:
"Sometimes politicians, journalists and the liberal left exclaim; "It's just a tax cut for the rich!" and it is just accepted to be fact.
But what does that really mean?
Just in case you are not completely clear on this issue, I hope the following will help. Please read it carefully.
Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner and the bill for all ten comes to $100.
If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what they decided to do.
The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.
"Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20." Dinner for the ten now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'
They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to eat their meal.
So, the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and! he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to eat for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.
"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man," but he got $10!"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!"
"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start eating overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier."
And just in case you cannot infer how I voted in the poll by my post, let me answer your question with a question: How do you keep an idiot in suspense? Answer: I'll tell you later
but there is one dead horse I have to beat (or is it a straw man...or a red herring?) Someone made a statement about taking money from the poor and giving it to the rich. I "Snopes"ed this, and while they have questions about the original author, they do not try to refute the premise.
For your consideration:
"Sometimes politicians, journalists and the liberal left exclaim; "It's just a tax cut for the rich!" and it is just accepted to be fact.
But what does that really mean?
Just in case you are not completely clear on this issue, I hope the following will help. Please read it carefully.
Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.
Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner and the bill for all ten comes to $100.
If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:
The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what they decided to do.
The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.
"Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20." Dinner for the ten now cost just $80.
The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'
They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to eat their meal.
So, the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and! he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.
And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).
The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to eat for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.
"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man," but he got $10!"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!"
"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"
The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!
And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start eating overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier."
And just in case you cannot infer how I voted in the poll by my post, let me answer your question with a question: How do you keep an idiot in suspense? Answer: I'll tell you later
22-rimfire
Member
I'd love to see AL Gore win the Democratic nomination. I would vote for nearly anyone else; makes voting easy.
The man is unstable.
The man is unstable.
Zen21Tao
Member
I guess if arming the populace would help to end the threat of Manbearpig, he'd be all for it.
I'm serial!
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked